CIT v. Southern Eastern Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd.

390 ITR 524High Court2017#570 most cited

What is CIT v. Southern Eastern Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. authority for?

Income from surplus funds invested in short-term deposits and securities by a cooperative credit society is not attributable to its activities and is therefore not eligible for exemption under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

170

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Southern Eastern Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. · Section 80P · Section 80P(2)(a)(i) · cooperative society exemption · interest income · short term deposits · surplus funds · income attributable to activities · Calcutta High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Southern Eastern Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd.

Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Satara vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Satara

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 569/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.569/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Satara. Patsanstha Ltd., 67, Guruwar Peth, At Post Karad, Dist.- Satara- 415110. Pan : Aaaaj1374R Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 26.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 29.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

…com 278, the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. 389 ITR 68 and the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Southern Eastern Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. 390 ITR 524 took a view that the income arising on the surplus invested in short term deposits and securities cannot be attributed to the activities of the society and, 4 therefore, not eligible for exemption u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. However, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. Vs. ITO (2015)…

Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Nandurbar vs. Invcome Tax Officer Ward-1, Dhule

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 552/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Pune26 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.552/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 Pan : Aaaak5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 25.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 24.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Was Filed On 08.09.2018 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs.Nil After Claiming Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Of Rs.78,15,971/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 15.02.2021 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 143(3A) & 143(3B) Of The Act At A Total Income Of Rs.42,09,784/-. While Doing So, The Assessing Officer Denied The Exemption U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) In Respect Of Interest Income On Deposits Made Out Of The Surplus Funds In Cooperative Banks & Scheduled Banks On The Ground That The Said Income Does Not Qualify For Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Or 80P(2)(D) Of The Act. 3. Being Aggrieved, An Appeal Was Filed Before The Nfac, Who Vide Impugned Order Confirmed The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer. 4. Being Aggrieved, The Appellant Is In Appeal Before This Tribunal In The Present Appeal.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…com 278, the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. 389 ITR 68 and the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Southern Eastern Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. 390 ITR 524 took a view that the 4 income arising on the surplus invested in short term deposits and securities cannot be attributed to the activities of the society and, therefore, not eligible for exemption u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. However, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. Vs. ITO (2015)…

Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Nandurbar vs. Invcome Tax Officer Ward-1, Dhule

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 551/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Pune26 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.551/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 Pan : Aaaak5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 24.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 24.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Was Filed On 10.10.2017 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs.Nil After Claiming Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Of Rs.73,98,124/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 31.10.2019 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act At A Total Income Of Rs.44,57,088/-. While Doing So, The Assessing Officer Denied The Exemption U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) In Respect Of Interest Income On Deposits Made Out Of The Surplus Funds In Cooperative Banks & Scheduled Banks On The Ground That The Said Income Does Not Qualify For Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Or 80P(2)(D) Of The Act. 3. Being Aggrieved, An Appeal Was Filed Before The Nfac, Who Vide Impugned Order Confirmed The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer. 4. Being Aggrieved, The Appellant Is In Appeal Before This Tribunal In The Present Appeal.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…com 278, the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. 389 ITR 68 and the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Southern Eastern Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. 390 ITR 524 4 took a view that the income arising on the surplus invested in short term deposits and securities cannot be attributed to the activities of the society and, therefore, not eligible for exemption u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. However, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. Vs. ITO (2015)…