Brilliant Gems, Mumbai vs. ITO WD 15(2)(3), Mumbai
The appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 5610/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Oct 2015AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year 2006-07 M/S Brilliant Gems, Ito, 4/301, 1St Floor, Ward 15(2)(3), बनाम/ Sonawala Estate, I B Patel 121, 1St Floor, Matru Mandir, Vs. Road, Goregaon (East), Mumbai Mumbai-400063 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No.Aagfb2219L
Section 271(1)(c)Section 44A
…ot sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding income of the assessee. Likewise, the Hon’ble Apex Court in North Land Development and Hotel Corporation 210 taxman 249 (SC) and CIT vs Skyline Auto Products Ltd. 271 ITR 335 (MP), it was held that when mistake is bona fide, penalty is not imposable u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. In view of the undisputed fact, available on record and the judicial pronouncements discussed hereinabove, we find merit in the contention of the ld. AR., therefore, we direct the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. Finally, the appeal of th…