CIT v. Shyam R. Pawar

54 Taxmann.com 108High Court2015#282 most cited

What is CIT v. Shyam R. Pawar authority for?

Transactions involving the purchase and sale of shares cannot be considered bogus where the assessee provides documentary evidence, unless the revenue brings substantial evidence on record to reject such proof. This principle is consistently applied in cases concerning claims of bogus long-term capital gains arising from penny stock transactions.

279

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Shyam R. Pawar · 54 Taxmann.com 108 · Section 68 · Section 10(38) · bogus long term capital gain · penny stock · documentary evidence · burden of proof · evidence rejection · substantial evidence

Also reported as

229 Taxmann 256

Sections most often in play

Section 68Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69CSection 148Section 131Section 133(6)

Issues it is cited on

price riggingbogus long term capital gainbogus ltcgpenny stocksection 10(38)period of holdingpreponderance of probabilitylong term capital gainscircular tradingentry operatorcolourable devicelong term capital gain

Judgments citing CIT v. Shyam R. Pawar

Smt. Shruti Lodha, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT CC 4(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 620/MUM/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

For Respondent: Shri Rakesh Garg
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 143(3)

…o. No. 7648/Mum/2019 decided on 11.08.2020 (ii). Smt Anjana Sandeep Rathi, Thane Vs ACIT, Circle-1, Thane (ITA No. 4369/Mum/2018) decided on 20.072020 (iii). Principle CIT-12, Vs Krishna Devi (ITA No. 125/2020) (Delhi HC) (iv). CIT-13 Vs Shyam R. Pawar (2015) 229 Taxmann 256 (Bombay HC) (v). Madhu Killa Vs. ACIT, Kolkata (ITA No. 834/Kol/2018) decided on 02.11.2018 (vi). CIT Vs Jamnadevi Agarawal (2010) 328 ITR 656 (Bom HC) (vii). CIT Vs Mukesh Marolia Bom (ITA No. 456 of 2007 Decided on 07.09.2011 22. The Ld. AR further submitted that during the course of search proceedings, no incriminating material was unearth…

Shri. Shripal Raj Lodha, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT CC 4(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 619/MUM/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

For Respondent: Shri Rakesh Garg
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 143(3)

…o. No. 7648/Mum/2019 decided on 11.08.2020 (ii). Smt Anjana Sandeep Rathi, Thane Vs ACIT, Circle-1, Thane (ITA No. 4369/Mum/2018) decided on 20.072020 (iii). Principle CIT-12, Vs Krishna Devi (ITA No. 125/2020) (Delhi HC) (iv). CIT-13 Vs Shyam R. Pawar (2015) 229 Taxmann 256 (Bombay HC) (v). Madhu Killa Vs. ACIT, Kolkata (ITA No. 834/Kol/2018) decided on 02.11.2018 (vi). CIT Vs Jamnadevi Agarawal (2010) 328 ITR 656 (Bom HC) (vii). CIT Vs Mukesh Marolia Bom (ITA No. 456 of 2007 Decided on 07.09.2011 22. The Ld. AR further submitted that during the course of search proceedings, no incriminating material was unearth…

Smt. Sarita Lodha, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT CC 4(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 618/MUM/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

For Respondent: Shri Rakesh Garg
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 143(3)

…o. No. 7648/Mum/2019 decided on 11.08.2020 (ii). Smt Anjana Sandeep Rathi, Thane Vs ACIT, Circle-1, Thane (ITA No. 4369/Mum/2018) decided on 20.072020 (iii). Principle CIT-12, Vs Krishna Devi (ITA No. 125/2020) (Delhi HC) (iv). CIT-13 Vs Shyam R. Pawar (2015) 229 Taxmann 256 (Bombay HC) (v). Madhu Killa Vs. ACIT, Kolkata (ITA No. 834/Kol/2018) decided on 02.11.2018 (vi). CIT Vs Jamnadevi Agarawal (2010) 328 ITR 656 (Bom HC) (vii). CIT Vs Mukesh Marolia Bom (ITA No. 456 of 2007 Decided on 07.09.2011 22. The Ld. AR further submitted that during the course of search proceedings, no incriminating material was unearth…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Himansu Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 45/CTK/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Himansu Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 44/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Deepansu Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 43/CTK/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Deepansu Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 42/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Anupama Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 41/CTK/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Anupama Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 40/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Sitansu Sekhar Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 38/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Smt. Kuntala Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 50/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Parbati Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 49/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Kishore Kumar Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 48/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Mamata Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 47/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

ITO, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak vs. Amruta Preetam Mohapatra, Bhadrak

In the result, Appeals of the revenue in in ITANos

ITA 46/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri S.C Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ITA Nos.42 & 43/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Deepansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AQHPM3912G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.44 & 45/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015 & 2015-16) ITO Vs Himansu Mohapatra Kuansh, Bhadrak, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak PAN No. : AJDPM0006A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ITA Nos.38 & 39/CTK/2020 (नििाारण वषा / A…

Vasantlal Nyalchand Kikvat Through L/H Pankaj V Kikavat, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT CC 3 (4), Mumbai

The appeal stands partly allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 7921/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आिकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. Nos.7921/Mum/2019 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आिकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. Nos.7922/Mum/2019 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Shri Vasantlal Nyalchand Kikavat Dcit-Cc 3(4), 1915, 19Th Floor (Through L/H Shri Pankaj V.Kikavat) बिाम/ 1201, D-Wing, Kukreja Towers, Air India Building Vs. Garodiya Nagar, Ghatkopar (E), Nariman Point Mumbai-400 077 Mumbai-400 021 स्थािीलेखा िं./जीआइआर िं./Pan/Gir No. Aabpk-6317-K (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Assessee By : Shri Neelkanth Khandelwal– Ld. Ar Revenue By : Ms. Usha Gaikwad– Ld. Sr. Dr ुनवाई की तारीख/ : 22/11/2021 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 17/12/2021 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Neelkanth Khandelwal– Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Usha Gaikwad– Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

…support of various submissions, reliance was placed on various judicial pronouncements which have already been enumerated in the assessment order. Prominent amongst the same was the decision of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT V/s Shayam R. Pawar (54 Taxmann.com 108). 2.6 In support of transactions, the assessee had furnished copy of broker contract note for purchase as well as sale of share of Unisys along with bank statement evidencing inflow & outflow of funds through banking channels. The assessee also furnished demat account statement showing movement of shares in and from the demat account. The…

Ashok Kumar Agarwal & Sons (HUF), Mumbai vs. Dy CIT -CC-7(3), Mumbai

In the result , both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 647/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Dec 2021AY 2013-14
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “SMC” BENCH MUMBAI SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHASHI AGARWAL Vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL 201 Ugam, NS Road.9, JVPD RANGE-7 (3), MUMBAI Scheme Juhu, Villeparle- Room No. 655, 6 th Floor, West Mumbai, Maharashtra 400049 Ayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Church gate, Mumbai 400020 PAN/GIR No AAWPA9455B (Appellant) .. (Respondent) (ITA No.647/Mum/2021) (Assessment Year : 2013-14) ASHOK KUMAR AGARWAL & Vs. Dy COMMISSIONER OF INCOME SONS(HUF) TAX, CENTRAL RANGE-7(3), Room No. 655, 6th Floor, Ayakar 201 Ugam, NS Road No.9. JV…

Shashi Agarwal, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT -CC-7(3), Mumbai

In the result , both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 646/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Dec 2021AY 2013-14
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “SMC” BENCH MUMBAI SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHASHI AGARWAL Vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL 201 Ugam, NS Road.9, JVPD RANGE-7 (3), MUMBAI Scheme Juhu, Villeparle- Room No. 655, 6 th Floor, West Mumbai, Maharashtra 400049 Ayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Church gate, Mumbai 400020 PAN/GIR No AAWPA9455B (Appellant) .. (Respondent) (ITA No.647/Mum/2021) (Assessment Year : 2013-14) ASHOK KUMAR AGARWAL & Vs. Dy COMMISSIONER OF INCOME SONS(HUF) TAX, CENTRAL RANGE-7(3), Room No. 655, 6th Floor, Ayakar 201 Ugam, NS Road No.9. JV…

Kamlesh Gupta, Mumbai vs. DCIT - 13(3)(1), Mumbai

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1462/MUM/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman () & Shri Ravish Sood () Kamlesh Gupta Dy. Commissioner Of 59, Mount Unique 62-A, Vs. Income-Tax (13)(3)(1) Peddar Road, Room No. 229, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400 026 M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020 Pan No. Aegpg6788R

For Appellant: Shri Hitesh Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Kanandan, D.R
Section 10Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

…ITA No. 1462/Mum/2020 A.Y. 2011-12 1 Kamlesh Gupta Vs. Dy.CIT-(13)(3)(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Kamlesh Gupta Dy. Commissioner of 59, Mount Unique 62-A, Vs. Income-tax (13)(3)(1) Peddar Road, Room No. 229, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400 026 M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020 PAN No. AEGPG6788R (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee by : Shri Hitesh Shah, A.R Revenue by : Shri Vivek Kanandan, D.R Date of Hearing : 11/10/2021 Date of pronouncement : 25/11/2021 ORDER PER RAVISH SOOD, J.M: The present…

ITO 33 (2)(4), Mumbai vs. Nisha G. Shah, Mumbai

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 6207/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Oct 2021AY 2011-12
Section 148

…nts filed by the appellant, the STCL claimed by the appellant of cannot be treated as bogus. Reliance is placed on the following cases. • C.I.T. vs. Shri Mukesh Ratilal Marolia (Income Tax Appeal No. 456 of 2007, order dt. 07/09/2011, Bom HC) • Shyam R Pawar (54 Taxmann.com 108, Bom HC) • Manishkumar Baid and Mahendrakumar Baid vs. A.C.I.T. Cir-35, Kolkata(I.T.A. No. 1236 & 1237/KoI/2017, order dt 18.08.2017, ITAT Kolkata) • A.C.I.T. Circle-7, Ahmedabad vs. Vineet Sureshchandra Agarwal (I.T.A. no. 1442/ Ahd/2013, order dt. 06/01/2017, IT AT Ahmedabad) • A.C.I.T. Circle Pali vs. Shri Pankaj Raj Shah(I.T.A. no. 330…