CIT v. Shri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd.

220 CTR 404High Court2008#1520 most cited

What is CIT v. Shri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd. authority for?

The Income Tax Department should not expend significant time and energy on tax-neutral issues that do not affect the overall tax collection, particularly when determining the year of taxability of income where tax rates remain constant.

75

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2009 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Shri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd. · tax neutral issues · year of taxability · departmental energy · section 143(3) · section 142(1) · section 132(4) · CIT v. Nagri Mills Co. Ltd. · CIT v. Triveni Engg. & Industries Ltd.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Shri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd.

DCIT, Circle- 7(1), New Delhi vs. Dlf Brands Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and Cross Objection of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4152/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 4152/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S Dlf Brands Ltd., Tax, Circle-7(1), 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-55 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aafca7971E Co No. 196/Del/2017 (In Ita No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12) M/S Dlf Brands Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, Tax, Circle-7(1), Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi New Delhi-55 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aafca7971E Assessee By : Sh. R. S. Singhvi, Ca Revenue By : Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.12.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.12.2019

For Appellant: Sh. R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr. DR
Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 ITA No. 4152/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner of Income Vs M/s DLF Brands Ltd., Tax, Circle-7(1), 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-55 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAFCA7971E CO No. 196/Del/2017 (in ITA No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12) M/s DLF Brands Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, Tax, Circle-7(1), Jhandewalan Extension, New…

DCIT, Circle- 7(1), New Delhi vs. Dlf Brands Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and Cross Objection of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4151/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Dec 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 4152/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S Dlf Brands Ltd., Tax, Circle-7(1), 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-55 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aafca7971E Co No. 196/Del/2017 (In Ita No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12) M/S Dlf Brands Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, Tax, Circle-7(1), Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi New Delhi-55 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aafca7971E Assessee By : Sh. R. S. Singhvi, Ca Revenue By : Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.12.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.12.2019

For Appellant: Sh. R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr. DR
Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 ITA No. 4152/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner of Income Vs M/s DLF Brands Ltd., Tax, Circle-7(1), 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-55 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAFCA7971E CO No. 196/Del/2017 (in ITA No. 4151/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12) M/s DLF Brands Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income 1-E, Naaz Cinema Complex, Tax, Circle-7(1), Jhandewalan Extension, New…

Odisha State Beverages Corporation Limited, Bhubaneswar vs. ACIT, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 130/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack04 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Before Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicialmember Member & Laxmi Prasad Sahulaxmi Prasad Sahulaxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year :2014-2015 Odisha State Beverage Corpn Odisha State Beverage Corpn Vs. Acit, Acit, Corporate Corporate Circle Circle-1(2), Ltd., 2Nd Floor, Fortune Towers, Floor, Fortune Towers, Chandrasekharpur, Chandrasekharpur, Chandrasekharpur Chandrasekharpur Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No.Aaaco 6507 H Aaaco 6507 H (Appellant) (Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ved Jain, Ar Revenue By : Shris.M.Keshkamat, Cit, Dr , Dr Date Of Hearing : 20 /08/ 2019 Date Of Pronouncement :04/10/ 201 / 2019 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg,Jm C.M.Garg,Jm This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A),1, Bhubaneswar Cit(A),1, Bhubaneswar Dated 8.1.2018 For The Assessment Year For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Raised Are As Under: Grounds Of Appeal Raised Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, ARFor Respondent: ShriS.M.Keshkamat, CIT, DR
Section 22Section 40

…igh Court in CIT vs Nagri Mills Co. Ltd, 33 ITR 681 (Bom) iv) Delhi High Court in CIT vs M/s. Vishnu Industrial Gases Pvt Ltd in ITA No.229/1988 P a g e 12 | 15 Assessment Year : 2014-2015 v) Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT vs Shri Ram Pistons & Rings Ltd., 220 CTR 404(Del) 23. Ld D.R. supported the orders of lower authorities. 24. After hearing the rival submissions, we find that the main reason for disallowance made by the Assessing Officer is that the assessee has not established with evidence that the expenses related to earlier(s) have actually crystalised during the relevant previous year, which has been…

DCIT Corporate Circle 1 (1), Chennai vs. M/S East Coast Constructions & Industries Limited, Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1442/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 1442/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. East Coast Constructions & Income Tax, Central Circle 1(1), Vs. Industries Ltd., No. 4, Moores Road, Chennai – 34. Chennai 600 006. [Pan:Aaace1662P] (Appellant) (Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. Tripurasundari, Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 11.09.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 6, Chennai Dated 30.01.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2010-11. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Revenue Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting The Disallowance Of ₹.25,24,97,133/- Towards Expenses Relatable To The Retention Money Withheld By The Contractees.

For Appellant: Ms. Tripurasundari, CITFor Respondent: Shri G. Baskar, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 263

…of the assessee or the tax that the Department is likely to collect from him whether in one year or the other." 12.1 The aforesaid observation of the Bombay High Court was reiterated by the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs Shri Ram Pistos and Rings Ltd, 220 CTR 404, as under: "Finally, we may only mention what has been articulated by the Bombay High Court in CIT v. Nagri Mills Co. Ltd. [1958] 33 ITR 681 (Bom) as follows : . . In the reference that is before us there is no doubt that the assessee had incurred an expenditure. The only dispute is regarding the date on which the liability had crystallized. It a…