CIT v. Sarjan Realities Ltd.

50 Taxmann.com 52High Court2014#6688 most cited

What is CIT v. Sarjan Realities Ltd. authority for?

A payment of interest cannot be deemed excessive or unreasonable solely because the assessee pays different rates to different companies, provided the rates are not above the market rate.

17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Sarjan Realities Ltd. · 50 Taxmann.com 52 · Section 40A(2)(b) · interest payment to related parties · excessive and unreasonable interest · market rate of interest · fair market value

Judgments citing CIT v. Sarjan Realities Ltd.

M/S. K.N. Diamond, Bilimora vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Navsari Circle, Navsari

ITA 1788/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1788/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S K.N.Diamond, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Soniwad, Bilimora, Of Income Tax, Navsari Navsari – 396 321. Circle, Navsari. [Pan: Aadfk 3167 H] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओर से /Assessee By Shri Parimalsinh Parmar – Advocate राज"वक"ओर से /Revenue By Smt. Anupama Singla – Sr.Dr

Section 194JSection 40Section 40A(2)(b)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, सुरत "यायपीठ, सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Hon'ble JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Dr. ARJUN LAL SAINI, Hon'ble ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1788/AHD/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s K.N.Diamond, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Soniwad, Bilimora, of Income Tax, Navsari Navsari – 396 321. Circle, Navsari. [PAN: AADFK 3167 H] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओर से /Assessee by Shri Parimalsinh Parmar – Advocate राज"वक"ओर से /Revenue by Smt. Anupama Singla – Sr.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing: 20.0…

The ITO, Ward-1(3), Ahmedabad vs. M/S. Crystal Ceramic Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 526/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 526/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 Ito, Ward-1(1)(3) M/S.Crystal Ceramic Ahmedabad. Vs Industries P.Ltd. B-19, Vishnu Park Society Opp: Bethak B/H. Bhagyodaya Tenaments Naroda, Ahmedabad 382 345. अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.Dr Assessee By : Shri Tushar Hemani, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘D’ BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 526/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 ITO, Ward-1(1)(3) M/s.Crystal Ceramic Ahmedabad. Vs Industries P.Ltd. B-19, Vishnu Park Society Opp: Bethak B/h. Bhagyodaya Tenaments Naroda, Ahmedabad 382 345. अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Revenue by : Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR Assessee by : Shri Tushar Hemani, AR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 24/04/2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date…

CIT v. Sarjan Realities Ltd. (50 Taxmann.com 52) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax