CIT v. Sant Lal
118 Taxmann.com 432High Court2020#644 most cited
What is CIT v. Sant Lal authority for?
An addition to income cannot be made solely on the basis of entries in a diary seized from a third party if the diary is not found in the assessee's premises, not in the assessee's handwriting, and the revenue fails to provide corroborative evidence linking the assessee to the diary.
154
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Sant Lal · section 132 · section 153C · hundi transaction · dumb documents · diary entries · third-party premises · corroborative evidence · addition to income · search and seizure · adverse inference
Also reported as
423 ITR 1317 CTR 483