CIT v. Sakthi Sugars Ltd.

175 Taxmann.com 799High Court2025#10886 most cited

What is CIT v. Sakthi Sugars Ltd. authority for?

Expenditure incurred for procurement and uninterrupted supply of raw materials is closely related to the business and is allowable as a business expenditure, even if mislabeled, provided the payment and its purpose are not disputed.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Sakthi Sugars Ltd. · business expenditure · procurement · supply of sugarcane · closely related to business · disputed payment · disputed purpose · nomenclature of advance · goodwill

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Sakthi Sugars Ltd.

CIT v. Sakthi Sugars Ltd. (175 Taxmann.com 799) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax