CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son

300 ITR 157High Court2008#155 most cited

What is CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son authority for?

A statement recorded under duress during a survey, if subsequently retracted, has no evidentiary value and cannot be the sole basis for an income-tax assessment; the assessment should instead rely on audited accounts.

452

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2010 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son · S. Khader Khan Son · Section 133A · Section 132(4) · retracted statement · survey statement evidentiary value · statement under duress · assessment based on retracted statement · no evidentiary value for survey statement · audited accounts reliance

Also reported as

214 CTR 58940 Taxmann.com 329

Sections most often in play

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 131Section 147Section 148Section 115BBESection 132(4)Section 132

Issues it is cited on

section 133a(3)(iii)retracted statementstatement under section 132(4)survey under section 133asection 269sssection 133asection 292csection 132(4a)loose paperssection 158bsection 133section 132(4)

Judgments citing CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son

Mantor Capital Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 22, Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed in part, in terms indicated hereinabove, whereas appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 194/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosainआमकय अऩीर सं./Ita Nos.7408/M/2014 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Acit Cc 3(3) Vs. Mentor Capital Ltd. 713 Raheja Centre Free Press Mumbai – 4000020 Journal Rd. Nariman Pt. Mumbai-400021 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp7995G (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. & आमकय अऩीर सं./ Ita Nos. 194 To 196/M/2015 & 7512/M/2014 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2008-2009 To 2011-2012) Vs. Acit, Mentor Capital Ltd. 713 Raheja Centre Free Cc -22 Press Journal Rd. Mumbai – 4000020 Nariman Pt. Mumbai- 400021 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp7995G (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri N.P. Singh, Cit Dr ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Mr. N. R. Suresh, Ar सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/07/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 03/08/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A)-Mumbai, For The A.Y.2010-2011 & The Appeals Filed By Assessee For Assessment Years 2008-2009 To 2011-2012, In The Matter Order Passed U/S 143(3)/143(3) R.W.S.147 Of The I.T. Act.

For Appellant: Mr. N. R. Suresh, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.P. Singh, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 3

…ld. CIT(A) both assessee and Revenue are in appeal before us. 12. It was argued by ld. AR that merely on the basis of statement recorded during course of survey u/s.133A an addition cannot be made as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of S. Kadar Khan 300 ITR 157. Our attention was also invited to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. S.Khader Khan Son (2008) 214 CTR 589 wherein Madras High Court, held as under :- "Section 133A does not empower any ITO to examine any person on oath; so statement recorded under section 133A has no evidentiary value and any admission made during…

Mentor Capital Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 22, Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed in part, in terms indicated hereinabove, whereas appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7512/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Aug 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosainआमकय अऩीर सं./Ita Nos.7408/M/2014 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Acit Cc 3(3) Vs. Mentor Capital Ltd. 713 Raheja Centre Free Press Mumbai – 4000020 Journal Rd. Nariman Pt. Mumbai-400021 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp7995G (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. & आमकय अऩीर सं./ Ita Nos. 194 To 196/M/2015 & 7512/M/2014 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2008-2009 To 2011-2012) Vs. Acit, Mentor Capital Ltd. 713 Raheja Centre Free Cc -22 Press Journal Rd. Mumbai – 4000020 Nariman Pt. Mumbai- 400021 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp7995G (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri N.P. Singh, Cit Dr ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Mr. N. R. Suresh, Ar सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/07/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 03/08/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A)-Mumbai, For The A.Y.2010-2011 & The Appeals Filed By Assessee For Assessment Years 2008-2009 To 2011-2012, In The Matter Order Passed U/S 143(3)/143(3) R.W.S.147 Of The I.T. Act.

For Appellant: Mr. N. R. Suresh, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.P. Singh, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 3

…ld. CIT(A) both assessee and Revenue are in appeal before us. 12. It was argued by ld. AR that merely on the basis of statement recorded during course of survey u/s.133A an addition cannot be made as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of S. Kadar Khan 300 ITR 157. Our attention was also invited to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. S.Khader Khan Son (2008) 214 CTR 589 wherein Madras High Court, held as under :- "Section 133A does not empower any ITO to examine any person on oath; so statement recorded under section 133A has no evidentiary value and any admission made during…

ACIT CC 3(3) Cen RG 3, Mumbai vs. Mentor Capital Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed in part, in terms indicated hereinabove, whereas appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7408/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Aug 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosainआमकय अऩीर सं./Ita Nos.7408/M/2014 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Acit Cc 3(3) Vs. Mentor Capital Ltd. 713 Raheja Centre Free Press Mumbai – 4000020 Journal Rd. Nariman Pt. Mumbai-400021 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp7995G (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. & आमकय अऩीर सं./ Ita Nos. 194 To 196/M/2015 & 7512/M/2014 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2008-2009 To 2011-2012) Vs. Acit, Mentor Capital Ltd. 713 Raheja Centre Free Cc -22 Press Journal Rd. Mumbai – 4000020 Nariman Pt. Mumbai- 400021 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp7995G (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri N.P. Singh, Cit Dr ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Mr. N. R. Suresh, Ar सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/07/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 03/08/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A)-Mumbai, For The A.Y.2010-2011 & The Appeals Filed By Assessee For Assessment Years 2008-2009 To 2011-2012, In The Matter Order Passed U/S 143(3)/143(3) R.W.S.147 Of The I.T. Act.

For Appellant: Mr. N. R. Suresh, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.P. Singh, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 3

…ld. CIT(A) both assessee and Revenue are in appeal before us. 12. It was argued by ld. AR that merely on the basis of statement recorded during course of survey u/s.133A an addition cannot be made as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of S. Kadar Khan 300 ITR 157. Our attention was also invited to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. S.Khader Khan Son (2008) 214 CTR 589 wherein Madras High Court, held as under :- "Section 133A does not empower any ITO to examine any person on oath; so statement recorded under section 133A has no evidentiary value and any admission made during…

Innovators Facade Systems P.Ltd, Thane vs. ACIT Cir 2, Thane

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed in part

ITA 5450/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Naresh Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Pavan Kumar Beerla, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…has any evidentiary value against the assessee in the income-tax proceedings therefore, the purchases in question held to be bogus-Impugned addition deleted.” cannot be 18. As per verdict of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. S. Kahder Khan & sons, 300 ITR 157, Section 133A does not empower any IT Authority to examine any person on oath, hence, mere statement recorded during survey has no evidentiary value and any such addition cannot be made, without bringing on record corroborative materials. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further observed that this view is clearly supported by CBDT Circular dated 10th…

A.C.I.T Cir - 30, Kolkata vs. Samar Kumar Sen, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 952/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Subash Agarwal, AR
Section 133ASection 143(3)

…thew & Sons vs CIT reported in (2003) 263 ITR 101 (Ker) Sec 133A of the Act does not empower any ITO to examine any person on oath . Thus the statement elicited during the survey operation has no evidentiary value. CIT vs S Khader Khan Son reported in (2008) 300 ITR 157 (Mad) “An admission is an extremely important piece of evidence , but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and it is open to the person , who made it, to show it has incorrectly been made and the person, making the statement should be given proper opportunity to show that it does not show the correct state of facts.” 9 Samar Kumar Sen, AY 20…

ACIT Cen Cir 32, Mumbai vs. Pravin B. Bhandarkar, Mumbai

ITA 6672/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7364/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, 400020 Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.6671/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Prakash B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 6672/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Pravin B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : Shri Vijay Mehta राज"व क" क" ओर क" क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By ओर : Shri C.W.Angolkar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/04/2016 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/06/2016

Section 143(3)

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई "यायपीठ "यायपीठ ‘सी’, मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई मुंबई । मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. ACIT, CC-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ACNPN 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. AND आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.…

ACIT Cen Cir 32, Mumbai vs. Prakash B Bhandarkar, Mumbai

ITA 6671/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7364/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, 400020 Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.6671/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Prakash B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 6672/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Pravin B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : Shri Vijay Mehta राज"व क" क" ओर क" क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By ओर : Shri C.W.Angolkar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/04/2016 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/06/2016

Section 143(3)

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई "यायपीठ "यायपीठ ‘सी’, मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई मुंबई । मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. ACIT, CC-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ACNPN 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. AND आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.…

Asst CIT Cen Cir 32, Mumbai vs. Pandoo P. Naig, Mumbai

ITA 7364/MUM/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7364/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, 400020 Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.6671/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Prakash B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 6672/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Pravin B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : Shri Vijay Mehta राज"व क" क" ओर क" क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By ओर : Shri C.W.Angolkar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/04/2016 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/06/2016

Section 143(3)

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई "यायपीठ "यायपीठ ‘सी’, मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई मुंबई । मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. ACIT, CC-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ACNPN 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. AND आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.…

Pandurang Naig, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 32, Mumbai

ITA 7089/MUM/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.7364/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, 400020 Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acnpn 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.6671/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Prakash B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 6672/Mum/2012 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit, Cc-32, Mumbai- Vs. Pravin B. Bandarkar, Room 400020 No.1, Baburao Chawl, Hanuman Takadi, Bhandup (W), Mumbai- 400078 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahlpb 1306 N (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : Shri Vijay Mehta राज"व क" क" ओर क" क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By ओर : Shri C.W.Angolkar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/04/2016 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/06/2016

Section 143(3)

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई "यायपीठ "यायपीठ ‘सी’, मुंबई "यायपीठ मुंबई मुंबई । मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.7089/Mum/2011 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2008-09) वष" Shri Pandoo P. Naig, 96-98, Vs. ACIT, CC-32, Mumbai- Mint Road, Mumbai-400001 400020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ACNPN 2800 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. AND आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.…

ACIT, Cen. Cir-VI, Kolkata vs. Smt. Usha Agarwal, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and cross objection of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 142/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Jun 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 143(3)

…ases:- CIT vs Chandrakumar Jethmal Kochar reported in (2015) 230 Taxman 78 (Gujarat) M.Narayanan & Bros vs ACIT reported in (2011) 339 ITR 192 (Mad) 7 ITA No.142/K/2014 & CO No.16/K/2016 Usha Agarwal. AY 2010-11 CIT vs S Khader Khan Sons reported in (2008) 300 ITR 157 (Mad) which was later approved by Hon’ble Supreme Court Bachittar Singh vs CIT reported in (2010) 328 ITR 400 (P&H) In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and judicial precedents relied upon hereinabove, we hold that the Learned CITA had rightly deleted the addition made in the sum of Rs 1 crore. 8.1. Apropos the alleged cash deposit…

Mc Dermott Eastern Hemisphere Td ( Formelry Known As J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Hemisphere Ltd), Mumbai vs. DDIT (It) 3(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7855/MUM/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

J Ray Mcdermott Eastern Hemisphere Ltd, Mumbai vs. DDIT (It) 3(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8720/MUM/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

J Ray Mcdermott Eastrn Hemisphere Ltd, Mumbai vs. DDIT (It) 3(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8718/MUM/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

J Ray Mcdermott Eastrn Hemisphere Ltd, Mumbai vs. DDIT (It), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8717/MUM/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Hemisphere Ltd, Mumbai vs. ADIT (It)-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2227/MUM/2009[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2002-2003

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Hemisphere Ltd, Mumbai vs. ADIT (It)-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2226/MUM/2009[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2000-2001

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Hemisphere Ltd, Mumbai vs. The ACIT It 3(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2309/MUM/2006[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2002-2003

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

J.Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Hemisphere Ltd vs. The Jdit (It) 4

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5302/MUM/2004[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2016AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 1998-99 Adit (It) 1(2), M/S. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/O. Price Waterhouse & Co. Cas Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8Th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. Aabcm1087F

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,L,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “L”, MUMBAI Before Shri C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 1998-99 ADIT (IT) 1(2), M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Aayakar Bhavan, Hemisphere Ltd., बनाम/ M.K. Road, C/o. Price Waterhouse & Co. CAs Vs. Mumbai-400020 Trade World, ‘C’ Wing, 8th Floor, Kamla Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai- 400013 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No. AABCM1087F ITA NOs.4434/Mum/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s. J. Ray Mc Dermott JCIT S. Range-12, Eastern Hemisphere L…

Avinash Kumar Setia, New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 1787/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. UN Marwah, FCAFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Gotru, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)

…rvey u/s. 133A of the I.T. Act in view of the various judicial decision wherein it has been held that the such statement does not have any evidentiary value especially the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kahder Khan Son (2008) 300 ITR 157 which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case CIT vs. Khader Khan Son reported in (2012) 25 taxman.com 413 (SC) and appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed by holding that section 133A does not empower any ITO to examine any person on oath. In addition to these cases, he relied upon the following cases also:- - Pullan…

Addl CIT 24(3), Mumbai vs. Indervadan H Jain, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of revenue is allowed in part

ITA 103/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2016AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Pramod Kumar ParidaFor Respondent: Shri Bhanwar Singh Ratnoo
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 37

…admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive in the case of Pullamcode Rubber Industries reported in 91 ITR '18 (SC). The statement recorded have to be corroborated with other materials. 2. CIT vs.Kadarkhan 300 ITR 157(Madras} Income-tax survey--Scope of section 133A--Difference between sections 133A and 132(4)--Statement in survey operations--Not conclusive piece of evidence--Statement by partner in survey operations regarding undisclosed income of firm--Subsequent retraction of statement by firm--Amount disclosed by partner not assessable as income of firm--…