CIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd.

392 ITR 2High Court2017#493 most cited

What is CIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. authority for?

Employee contributions to provident fund and ESI, if deposited before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1), are allowable deductions under section 36(1)(va) and cannot be disallowed. Such an adjustment is also not permissible summarily under section 143(1).

191

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,369 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. · Section 36(1)(va) · employee contribution · PF ESI · due date return of income · Section 143(1) adjustment · allowability of employee contribution · SLP dismissed

Also reported as

250 Taxmann 32

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd.

Accme (Urvashi Pumps) Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4-2, Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 316/JPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 316/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year : 2014-15 Cuke M/S. Accme (Urvashi Pumps) Engineers (P) Ltd. The Ito Vs. A-407, A/A Road No. 14 Vki Area, Ward- 4(2) Jaipur Jaipur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@ Pan/Gir No.: Aabca 5655 R Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respo Ndent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Rohan Sogani, Ca Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Ms. Chanchal Meena, Jcit-Dr Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 25/02/2020 ?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 27 /02/2020 Vkns'K@ Order Per Vijay Pal Rao, Jm This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-2, Jaipur Dated 24-01-2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds. ‘’1. In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of Ao In Making Disallowance Of Rs. 1,53,053/- U/S 40(A)(Ia) Of The I.T. Act, 1961. The Action Of The Ld. Cit(A) Is Illegal, Unjustified, Arbitrary & Against The Facts Of The Case. Relief

For Appellant: Shri Rohan Sogani, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Chanchal Meena, JCIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH ‘A’, JAIPUR Jh fot; iky jko] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k Before : Shri Vijay Pal Rao, JM & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 316/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2014-15 cuke M/s. Accme (Urvashi Pumps) Engineers (P) Ltd. The ITO Vs. A-407, A/A Road No. 14 VKI Area, Ward- 4(2) Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@ PAN/GIR No.: AABCA 5655 R vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respo ndent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Rohan Sogani, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue…