ACIT, New Delhi vs. Sh. Mukesh Garg, New Delhi
In the result, the appeal of the department for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2010-11 are dismissed while the appeal for the assessment year 2008-09 is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 3549/DEL/2012[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Aug 2016AY 2010-11
Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm Ita Nos. 3546, 3547 & 3549/Del/2012 Asstt. Years : 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2010-11 Assistant Commissioner Of Vs Sh. Mukesh Garg, Income Tax, Circle-12, 292, Katra Peran, Tilak Bazar, New Delhi Delhi-110006 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaapg2585Q Assessee By : Sh. K. P. Ganguli, Adv. & Sh. G. S. Goel, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Sunil Chander Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.06.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.08.2016 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am:
For Appellant: Sh. K. P. Ganguli, Adv. & Sh. G. S. Goel, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Sunil Chander Sharma, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 36(1)(iii)Section 68
…nt was carrying on agricultural activities and the income derived there from was agricultural income under Sec 2(1A) of the Act. It would be advantageous to refer to the principle of law culled out by the Apex court in Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy's case [1957] 32 ITR 466 (SC). The Supreme Court defined the scope of the term "agriculture" in the following terms: 'As we have noted above, the primary sense in which the term 'agriculture' is understood is agar- field and cultra- cultivation, i.e., the cultivation of the field, and if the term is understood only in that sense, agriculture would be restricted only to cu…