CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora

52 Taxmann.com 172High Court2014#337 most cited

What is CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora authority for?

In search assessments conducted under Section 153A, additions can be made to the returned income for unabated assessment years even in the absence of incriminating material found during the search operation. This ruling was in favor of the revenue.

253

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora · Raj Kumar Arora · Section 153A · search assessment · incriminating material · additions without incriminating material · unabated assessment · Section 132 · scope of assessment 153A · search and seizure assessment

Also reported as

367 ITR 517

Sections most often in play

Section 153ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 1961Section 132(4)Section 147

Issues it is cited on

abatement of assessmentsection 153a(1)(a)section 153a(1)(b)section 144basection 142(2a)shell companyblock periodsection 153bsection 153a(1)section 132asection 271dsection 132(1)

Judgments citing CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Meroform India Pvt Ltd., Noida

In the result appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4632/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan CAFor Respondent: Smt. Shafali Swaroop, CIT(DR)
Section 153ASection 40A

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A Nos.: - 4630, 4631, 4632, 4633, 4634, 4635/Del/2014 A.Y.s: 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 ACIT Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle-8 A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Vs. New Delhi. Noida PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA. No. 4494/Del/2014 Assessment Year 2011-12 Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Central Circle 8 Noida New Delhi. Uttar Pradesh 201305 PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) Department by: Smt. S…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Meroform India Pvt Ltd., Noida

In the result appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4631/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan CAFor Respondent: Smt. Shafali Swaroop, CIT(DR)
Section 153ASection 40A

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A Nos.: - 4630, 4631, 4632, 4633, 4634, 4635/Del/2014 A.Y.s: 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 ACIT Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle-8 A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Vs. New Delhi. Noida PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA. No. 4494/Del/2014 Assessment Year 2011-12 Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Central Circle 8 Noida New Delhi. Uttar Pradesh 201305 PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) Department by: Smt. S…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Meroform India Pvt Ltd., Noida

In the result appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4630/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan CAFor Respondent: Smt. Shafali Swaroop, CIT(DR)
Section 153ASection 40A

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A Nos.: - 4630, 4631, 4632, 4633, 4634, 4635/Del/2014 A.Y.s: 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 ACIT Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle-8 A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Vs. New Delhi. Noida PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA. No. 4494/Del/2014 Assessment Year 2011-12 Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Central Circle 8 Noida New Delhi. Uttar Pradesh 201305 PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) Department by: Smt. S…

M/S. Meroform (India) Pvt. Ltd., Uttar Pradesh vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4494/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan CAFor Respondent: Smt. Shafali Swaroop, CIT(DR)
Section 153ASection 40A

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A Nos.: - 4630, 4631, 4632, 4633, 4634, 4635/Del/2014 A.Y.s: 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 ACIT Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle-8 A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Vs. New Delhi. Noida PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA. No. 4494/Del/2014 Assessment Year 2011-12 Meroform India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT A-37, Sector 80, Phase II Central Circle 8 Noida New Delhi. Uttar Pradesh 201305 PAN AACCM5189P (Appellant) (Respondent) Department by: Smt. S…

M/S. Mona Agarwal, Meerut vs. ACIT, Faridabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 684/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri P.S. Kashyap, F.C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Shefali Swaroop, CIT [DR]
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A(1)(b)

…ITA. 684 (Del) of 2015. Mona Agarwal, Meerut. 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCHES : “ E ” NEW DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I. T. Appeal No. 684 (Del) of 2015 Assessment Year : 2008-09. Mrs. Mona Agarwal, Assistant Commissioner C/o. M/s. Kashyap & Co., C.As., of Income Tax, Vs. 214, Citi Centre, Central Circle : 1, Begum Bridge Road, F a r i d a b a d. Meerut – 250 001. PAN : AANPA 6595 R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri P.S. Kashyap, F.C.A.; Department by : Ms. Shefali Swaroop, CIT [DR]; Date of Hearing : 0…

DCIT, CC-II, Chandigarh vs. Smt. Priya Garg, Panchkula

In the result appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 989/CHANDI/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year: 2009-10 The Dy.Cit Vs. Smt. Priya Garg, Central Circle-Ii H.No. 89,Sector-7 Chandigarh Panchkula

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Sh. Ashish Abrol
Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153A

…he case the CIT(A) is right in not following the Hon'ble HC judgment on the issue of additions in search case u/s 153A in the case of CIT vs. Anil Kumar Bhatia 352 ITR 493 (Delhi HC), Madugula Venu vs. DIT 49 Taxman.com 200 (Delhi HC), CIT vs. Raj Kumar Arora 367 ITR 517 (Allahabad HC), canara Housing Development Company vs. DCIT 49 taxman.com98 (Karnataka HC), Filatex India Ltd. vs. CIT 229 Taxman 555 (Delhi HC) Sunny Jacob Jewellers and wedding centre, 362 ITR 664 (Kerala HC) and CIT vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation 64 taxman.com 34(SC)?" xi) Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) was justified in following the deci…

DCIT, CC-II, Chandigarh vs. M/S Dhg Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue is

ITA 990/CHANDI/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms Diva Singh & Ms. Annapurna Guptathe D.C.I.T., Vs. M/S Dhg Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-Ii, Sco 49-50, Sector 26, Chandigarh. Chandigarh. Pan: Aadcd1364Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Gulshan Raj, CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CA
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH ‘A’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE MS DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER The D.C.I.T., Vs. M/s DHG Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-II, SCO 49-50, Sector 26, Chandigarh. Chandigarh. PAN: AADCD1364Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Gulshan Raj, CIT DR Respondent by : Shri Ashwani Kumar, CA & Ms. Kanika Gupta, CA Date of hearing : 02.05.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 09.05.2018 ORDER PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, A.M.: The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order passed by learned Commissioner of Income…

DCIT, CC-II, Chandigarh vs. Sh. R.K. Garg, Chandigarh

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1191/CHANDI/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Sh. Ashish Abrol
Section 139Section 153A

…he case the CIT(A) is right in not following the Hon'ble HC judgment on the issue of additions in search case u/s 153A in the case of CIT vs. Anil Kumar Bhatia 352 ITR 493 (Delhi HC), Madugula Venu vs. DIT 49 Taxman.com 200 (Delhi HC), CIT vs. Raj Kumar Arora 367 ITR 517 (Allahabad HC), canara Housing Developmen Company vs. DCIT 49 taxman.com98 (Karnataka HC), Filatex India Ltd. vs. CIT 229 Taxman 555 (Delhi HC) Sunny Jacob Jewellers and wedding centre, 362 ITR 664 (Kerala HC) and CIT vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation 64 taxman.com 34(SC)?" xi) Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) was justified in following the deci…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. S P Singla Construction P Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 4594/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Bhavnesh Saini, Jm Ita No. 4593/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 4594/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Acit, Vs S P Singla Construction P. Ltd., D/10, Flat No. 22, 1St Floor, Dda Central Circle-26, New Delhi Flats, Sector-7, Rohini, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aagcs5773B Assessee By : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Ca Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 10.01.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.02.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: These Two Appeals By The Department Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Each Dated 31.05.2016 Of Ld. Cit(A)-29, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68

…n in the case law relied upon by the appellant, especially the judgment of jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (Supra) is applicable in the case of appellant. Here it is pertinent to mention that in the case of Raj Kumar Arora (2014) 52 Taxmann.com 172 (Allahabad), the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court had held that when an assessment has been initiated under section 153A of the Act, then the AO has jurisdiction and powers to take up the issues, which are not only related to or based on search proceedings but also with regard to material that was available at the time of original assessment.…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. S P Singla Construction P Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 4593/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Bhavnesh Saini, Jm Ita No. 4593/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 4594/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Acit, Vs S P Singla Construction P. Ltd., D/10, Flat No. 22, 1St Floor, Dda Central Circle-26, New Delhi Flats, Sector-7, Rohini, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aagcs5773B Assessee By : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Ca Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 10.01.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.02.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: These Two Appeals By The Department Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Each Dated 31.05.2016 Of Ld. Cit(A)-29, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68

…n in the case law relied upon by the appellant, especially the judgment of jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (Supra) is applicable in the case of appellant. Here it is pertinent to mention that in the case of Raj Kumar Arora (2014) 52 Taxmann.com 172 (Allahabad), the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court had held that when an assessment has been initiated under section 153A of the Act, then the AO has jurisdiction and powers to take up the issues, which are not only related to or based on search proceedings but also with regard to material that was available at the time of original assessment.…

DCIT, Jaipur vs. Godawari Estates Pvt. Ltd

ITA 493/JPR/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur07 Nov 2017AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal, CA and Shri Gulshan Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Rolee Agarwal, CIT - DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 56(1)

…on material found during search, Kabul Chawla has done exactly that, and so it has to be held that the conclusion so drawn is per incuriam. In this regard I draw solace from the decision of the Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora [2014] 367 ITR 517(All.) and the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Filatex India Ltd. v. CIT[2014] 49 taxmann.com 465(Delhi) both of which precede the decision in the case of Kabul Chawla. 2) There is another situation which has not been anticipated in Kabul Chawla. In that case the Hon’ble High Court proceeded on the grounds that processing of a case…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Superb Developers (P) Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed for statistical

ITA 52/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Apr 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. H.S.Sidhu & Sh.Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. H.S.SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH.ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .No.-52/Del/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2006-07) ACIT, Vs Superb Developers (P.) Ltd., Central Circle-3, WZ-183, F.F., Lane No.4, New Delhi. Lajwanti Garden, New Delhi. PAN-AAICS4437L (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by Sh.S.S.Rana, CIT DR Revenue by Sh.Suresh K.Gupta, Adv. ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (A). The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order dated 25.10.2013 of CIT(A)-1, New Delhi pertaining to A.Y. 2006-…

M/S. Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 2525/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Saini & Sh.L.P.Sahu

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

…igh Court in the case of E.N. Gopakumar vs CIT [2016] 75 taxmann.com 215 (Kerala High Court); decision in the case of Smt. Dayawanti vs CIT 75 taxmann.com 308 (Delhi High Court); decision of Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs Raj Kumar Arora [2014] 367 ITR 517 and CIT vs Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar Sahson Alld in ITA No.270 of 2014. Ld. DR also submitted that since the assessee did not file return of income prior to search, therefore, no assessment is completed, therefore, decision in the case of CIT vs Kabul Chawla (supra) would not apply. Ld. DR further submitted that the investors had not responded t…