CIT v. Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd.

382 ITR 42High Court2016#13155 most cited
8

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Judgments citing CIT v. Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd.

M/S. Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4270/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Jun 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena A. Pillai, Jm Ita No. 4270/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 M/S Radio Today Broadcasting Vs Acit, Ltd., F-26, Connaught Circus, Circle-15(1), New Delhi-110001 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcr7865A Assessee By : Sh. Shailesh Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Shravan Gupta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 21.06.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.06.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 15.07.2014 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xviii, New Delhi 2. The Only Grievance Of The Assessee In This Appeal Relates To The Confirmation Of Penalty Of Rs.73,94,750/- Levied By The Ao U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The Act).

For Appellant: Sh. Shailesh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 271(1)(c)

…O were deleted. Against the aforesaid order of the ITAT Delhi Bench “F”, New Delhi, the department preferred an appeal to the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court wherein vide order dated 09.12.2015 in the case of CIT Vs Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd. reported in 382 ITR 42 (Del.), the aforesaid order 3 Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd. dated 09.09.2014 passed by the ITAT was confirmed. From the aforesaid discussion, now it is clear that the additions/disallowances on the basis of which the AO levied the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act are not in existence, therefore, the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not leviabl…

CIT v. Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd. (382 ITR 42) — Cited in 8 Judgments | BharatTax