CIT v. R. Mallika

219 Taxmann 244High Court2013#10353 most cited

What is CIT v. R. Mallika authority for?

The onus is on the assessee to explain the source of jewellery, and instructions regarding non-seizure of jewellery do not absolve this responsibility.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2019.

Also referred to as

CIT v. R. Mallika · unexplained jewellery · source of income · onus on assessee · BDT instruction no.1916 · income tax assessment · revenue relied on case law

Also reported as

36 Taxmann.com 231

Judgments citing CIT v. R. Mallika

CIT v. R. Mallika (219 Taxmann 244) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax