CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Federation of Housing Building Societies Ltd.

11 Taxmann.com 448High Court2011#656 most cited

What is CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Federation of Housing Building Societies Ltd. authority for?

Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned by a cooperative society is subject to specific conditions or limitations, requiring careful appreciation of the statutory provisions to determine the eligible amount. This limits the full claim of such deductions by cooperative societies.

151

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Federation of Housing Building Societies Ltd. · Section 80P(2)(d) · cooperative society deduction · interest income · eligible business · Section 80P(2)(a)(i) · deduction restriction · 80P deduction conditions · cooperative income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Punjab State Cooperative Federation of Housing Building Societies Ltd.

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 2 (1), Panaji. vs. M/S Shree Kalika Urban Co-Op. Credit Society Limited, Mapusa

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed and the Revenues are dismissed

ITA 147/PAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji04 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Hon.Vice- & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Hon.(Through Web-Based Video Conferencing Platform) Shri Lokakalyan Souhard Vs Pr.Cit, Belagavi. Sahakari Niyamit, Jatrat, Tal- Chikodi, Dist. Belagavi. Pan: Aaajs 2263 H Appellant Respondent Shree Kalika Urban Co-Op Vs Acit, Circle-2(1), Credit Society Ltd., Shop Panaji. No.3, Rituraj Plaza, Keni Wada, Mapusa, Bardez, Goa. Pan: Aacas 1697 Q Appellant Respondent Goa Bagayatdar Sahakari Vs Acit, Circle-2(1), Kharedi Vikri Saunstha Panaji. Maryadit, Bagayatdar Bhavan, Ponda, Upper Bazar, Goa. Pan: Aaaag 2147 B Appellant Respondent The Marcela Urban Co-Op Vs Ito, Ward-2(3), Credit Society Ltd., Janavikas Panaji. Building, Near Kadamba Bus Stand, Marcela, North Goa, Goa. Pan: Aadat 5762 G Appellant Respondent

Section 263Section 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH :: PANAJI BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON.VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON.JUDICIAL MEMBER (Through web-based video conferencing platform) Shri Lokakalyan Souhard Vs Pr.CIT, Belagavi. Sahakari Niyamit, Jatrat, Tal- Chikodi, Dist. Belagavi. PAN: AAAJS 2263 H Appellant Respondent Shree Kalika Urban Co-op Vs ACIT, Circle-2(1), Credit Society Ltd., Shop Panaji. No.3, Rituraj Plaza, Keni Wada, Mapusa, Bardez, Goa. PAN: AACAS 1697 Q Appellant Respondent Goa Bagayatdar Sahakari vs ACIT, Circle-2(1), Kharedi Vikri Saunstha Panaji. Maryadit, Bagayatdar Bhavan…

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2 (1), Panaji. vs. M/S Goa Bagayatdar Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Saunstha Maryadit, Ponda

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed and the Revenues are dismissed

ITA 146/PAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji04 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Hon.Vice- & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Hon.(Through Web-Based Video Conferencing Platform) Shri Lokakalyan Souhard Vs Pr.Cit, Belagavi. Sahakari Niyamit, Jatrat, Tal- Chikodi, Dist. Belagavi. Pan: Aaajs 2263 H Appellant Respondent Shree Kalika Urban Co-Op Vs Acit, Circle-2(1), Credit Society Ltd., Shop Panaji. No.3, Rituraj Plaza, Keni Wada, Mapusa, Bardez, Goa. Pan: Aacas 1697 Q Appellant Respondent Goa Bagayatdar Sahakari Vs Acit, Circle-2(1), Kharedi Vikri Saunstha Panaji. Maryadit, Bagayatdar Bhavan, Ponda, Upper Bazar, Goa. Pan: Aaaag 2147 B Appellant Respondent The Marcela Urban Co-Op Vs Ito, Ward-2(3), Credit Society Ltd., Janavikas Panaji. Building, Near Kadamba Bus Stand, Marcela, North Goa, Goa. Pan: Aadat 5762 G Appellant Respondent

Section 263Section 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH :: PANAJI BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON.VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON.JUDICIAL MEMBER (Through web-based video conferencing platform) Shri Lokakalyan Souhard Vs Pr.CIT, Belagavi. Sahakari Niyamit, Jatrat, Tal- Chikodi, Dist. Belagavi. PAN: AAAJS 2263 H Appellant Respondent Shree Kalika Urban Co-op Vs ACIT, Circle-2(1), Credit Society Ltd., Shop Panaji. No.3, Rituraj Plaza, Keni Wada, Mapusa, Bardez, Goa. PAN: AACAS 1697 Q Appellant Respondent Goa Bagayatdar Sahakari vs ACIT, Circle-2(1), Kharedi Vikri Saunstha Panaji. Maryadit, Bagayatdar Bhavan…

Kolhapur District Central Co- Op Bank Kanista Sevakanchi Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd, Kolhapur vs. Income Tax Office, Ward-2(1), Kolhapur

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 695/PUN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Hon.Vice- & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Hon.The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.Cit-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. Pan: Aabtt 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-Op Vs Ito, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. Pan: Aaajb 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate Vs Pr.Cit-4, Pune. Credit Co-Op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solapur. Pan: Aamas 3645 L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Kiran B. Sanmane, CAFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE „A‟ BENCHES :: PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON.VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON.JUDICIAL MEMBER The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.CIT-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. PAN: AABTT 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-op vs ITO, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. PAN: AAAJB 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate vs Pr.CIT-4, Pune. Credit Co-op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solap…

Shri Bhagwant Multistate Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd, Solapur vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Pune

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 669/PUN/2023[2018-19`]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Jul 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Hon.Vice- & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Hon.The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.Cit-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. Pan: Aabtt 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-Op Vs Ito, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. Pan: Aaajb 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate Vs Pr.Cit-4, Pune. Credit Co-Op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solapur. Pan: Aamas 3645 L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Kiran B. Sanmane, CAFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE „A‟ BENCHES :: PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON.VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON.JUDICIAL MEMBER The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.CIT-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. PAN: AABTT 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-op vs ITO, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. PAN: AAAJB 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate vs Pr.CIT-4, Pune. Credit Co-op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solap…

Bajaj Auto Employees Co Op Credit Society Ltd, Pune vs. Income Tax Officer, Circle-8, Pune

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 667/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Hon.Vice- & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Hon.The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.Cit-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. Pan: Aabtt 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-Op Vs Ito, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. Pan: Aaajb 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate Vs Pr.Cit-4, Pune. Credit Co-Op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solapur. Pan: Aamas 3645 L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Kiran B. Sanmane, CAFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE „A‟ BENCHES :: PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON.VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON.JUDICIAL MEMBER The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.CIT-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. PAN: AABTT 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-op vs ITO, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. PAN: AAAJB 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate vs Pr.CIT-4, Pune. Credit Co-op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solap…

The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, Pune vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Pune

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 650/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Hon.Vice- & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Hon.The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.Cit-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. Pan: Aabtt 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-Op Vs Ito, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. Pan: Aaajb 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate Vs Pr.Cit-4, Pune. Credit Co-Op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solapur. Pan: Aamas 3645 L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Kiran B. Sanmane, CAFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE „A‟ BENCHES :: PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, HON.VICE-PRESIDENT & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, HON.JUDICIAL MEMBER The Mahatma Sahakari Griha Vs Pr.CIT-2, Pune. Rachana Sanstha Maryadit, S.No.62 & 65, Sahakar Bhavan, Kothrud, Pune. PAN: AABTT 5342 F Appellant Respondent Bajaj Auto Employees Co-op vs ITO, Ward-8, Credit Society Ltd., Bombay Pune. Pune Road, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Plot No.393/394, Sector 21, Akurdi, Pune. PAN: AAAJB 0024 D Appellant Respondent Shri Bhagwant Multistate vs Pr.CIT-4, Pune. Credit Co-op. Society Ltd., 739/7/17, Patil Plot, Shivaji Nagar Barshi, Solap…

Castlemaine Premises Co-Op Society Ltd, Pune vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Pune

The appeal of the assessee is ALLOWED

ITA 576/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Pune19 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 576/Pun/2023 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Castlemaine Premises Co-Op Society Ltd., Godrej Castlemaine, 42, Sassoon Rd., Next To Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune. Pan: Aaaac5155H . . . . . . . अपऩलधथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle- 4, Pune . . . . . . प्रत्यथी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Keyur Patel सपिवधई की तधरऩख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 15/06/2023 घोर्णध की तधरऩख / Date Of Pronouncement : 15/06/2023 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; This Appeal Of The Assessee For The Assessment Year [For Short “Ay”] 2018-19 Is Assailed Against The Revisionary Order Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Dt. 17/03/2023 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Ascended Out Of Assessment Order Dt. 24/02/2021 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S 143(3A) & 143(3B) By The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi, [For Short “Ao”].

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…॥ आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण, पुणे “ए” न्यायपीठ, पुणे में ॥ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपऩल सं. / ITA No. 576/PUN/2023 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Castlemaine Premises Co-op Society Ltd., Godrej Castlemaine, 42, Sassoon Rd., Next to Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune. PAN: AAAAC5155H . . . . . . . अपऩलधथी / Appellant बनाम / V/s Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle- 4, Pune . . . . . . प्रत्यथी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Keyur Patel स…

Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Satara vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Satara

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 569/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.569/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Satara. Patsanstha Ltd., 67, Guruwar Peth, At Post Karad, Dist.- Satara- 415110. Pan : Aaaaj1374R Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 26.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 29.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.569/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Satara. Patsanstha Ltd., 67, Guruwar Peth, At Post Karad, Dist.- Satara- 415110. PAN : AAAAJ1374R Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date of hearing : 26.05.2023 Date of pronouncement : 29.05.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, De…

Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Nandurbar vs. Invcome Tax Officer Ward-1, Dhule

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 552/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Pune26 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.552/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 Pan : Aaaak5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 25.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 24.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Was Filed On 08.09.2018 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs.Nil After Claiming Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Of Rs.78,15,971/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 15.02.2021 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 143(3A) & 143(3B) Of The Act At A Total Income Of Rs.42,09,784/-. While Doing So, The Assessing Officer Denied The Exemption U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) In Respect Of Interest Income On Deposits Made Out Of The Surplus Funds In Cooperative Banks & Scheduled Banks On The Ground That The Said Income Does Not Qualify For Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Or 80P(2)(D) Of The Act. 3. Being Aggrieved, An Appeal Was Filed Before The Nfac, Who Vide Impugned Order Confirmed The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer. 4. Being Aggrieved, The Appellant Is In Appeal Before This Tribunal In The Present Appeal.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.552/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 PAN : AAAAK5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date of hearing : 25.05.2023 Date of pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee…

Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Nandurbar vs. Invcome Tax Officer Ward-1, Dhule

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 551/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Pune26 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.551/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 Pan : Aaaak5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date Of Hearing : 24.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 24.03.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co- Operative Credit Society Registered Under Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Was Filed On 10.10.2017 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs.Nil After Claiming Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Of Rs.73,98,124/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 31.10.2019 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act At A Total Income Of Rs.44,57,088/-. While Doing So, The Assessing Officer Denied The Exemption U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) In Respect Of Interest Income On Deposits Made Out Of The Surplus Funds In Cooperative Banks & Scheduled Banks On The Ground That The Said Income Does Not Qualify For Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Or 80P(2)(D) Of The Act. 3. Being Aggrieved, An Appeal Was Filed Before The Nfac, Who Vide Impugned Order Confirmed The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer. 4. Being Aggrieved, The Appellant Is In Appeal Before This Tribunal In The Present Appeal.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.551/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Kai Fakira Jairam Patil Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Dhule. Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Shahada, Plot No.5A, Vrindavan Nagar, Besides Swami Samaratha Kendra, Shahada Tal. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar- 425409 PAN : AAAAK5870D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date of hearing : 24.05.2023 Date of pronouncement : 26.05.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee…