CIT v. Ooty Dasaprakash

237 ITR 902High Court1999#4828 most cited

What is CIT v. Ooty Dasaprakash authority for?

Expenditure incurred on repairs, modernization, and replacement of existing building components, furniture, and fittings for a hotel business is considered revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. The construction of a building on leasehold land can also be treated as revenue expenditure.

24

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2014 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Ooty Dasaprakash · revenue expenditure · capital expenditure · repairs · modernization · hotel business · building · furniture · fittings · leasehold land

Judgments citing CIT v. Ooty Dasaprakash