How many judgments cite CIT v. Nirav Modi?

286 judgments on BharatTax cite CIT v. Nirav Modi (390 ITR 292), spanning 2016 to 2026.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does CIT v. Nirav Modi come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 263, Section 143(3), Section 142(1), Section 144B, Section 147, Section 148.

CIT v. Nirav Modi

390 ITR 292High Court2017#275 most cited

What is CIT v. Nirav Modi authority for?

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) cannot invoke revisionary powers under Section 263 merely on the ground of "inadequate enquiry" by the Assessing Officer (AO) if the AO has conducted an enquiry, examined evidence, and formed a possible view. For Section 263 to apply, the PCIT must demonstrate that the assessment order is both erroneous (contrary to law) and prejudicial to the revenue.

286

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Nirav Modi · CIT v Nirav Modi · Section 263 · revisionary power · inadequate enquiry · erroneous and prejudicial · assessment order erroneous · twin conditions · Assessing Officer enquiry · Principal Commissioner

Also reported as

71 Taxmann.com 272241 Taxmann 255138 DTR 81

Sections most often in play

Section 263 Section 143(3)Section 142(1)Section 144B Section 147 Section 148 Section 151 Section 80G

Issues it is cited on

inadequate enquiry lack of enquiry section 263(1)malabar industrial assessment order erroneous revision u/s 263 erroneous and prejudicial revision under section 263 section 54f section 263 section 26 section 54

Judgments citing CIT v. Nirav Modi

Smt. Pushpa Jhabak, Raipur vs. PCIT-1, Raipur

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 237/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

…the Act. Our aforesaid view is fortified by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Anindita Steel Ltd. (2022) 1387 taxmann.com 203 (Cal.) and that of Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of CIT Vs. Nirav Modi (2017) 390 ITR 292 (Bom). Accordingly, in terms of the aforesaid settled position of law, if the A.O after carrying out necessary inquiry and verification had adopted one of the plausible view amongst other, resulting in the loss of the revenue, then on the standalone basis that the Commissioner does not agree with the view taken by him would not render the order p…

Smt. Tilottama Jhabak, Raipur vs. PCIT-1, Raipur

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 236/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

Smt. Sushila Devi Jhabak, Raipur vs. PCIT-1, Raipur

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 235/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

Sanjog Jhabak L/H of Late Gautam Chand Jhabak, Raipur vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur-1, Raipur

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 234/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

Sanjog Jhabak, Raipur vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur-1, Raipur

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 233/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

M/S Ehealthsystem Heaith-Care Ltd., Pune vs. PCIT-1, Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 944/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.944/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/S.Ehealthsystem Health- V The Pr.Cit-1, Care Ltd., S Pune. 1073, Bhosatemostique, Opposite Symbiosis, Gokhate Road, Model Colony, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aadcn5780C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Pratik Sandbhor - Ar Revenue By Mr.Ajaykumar Keshari, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 20/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/01/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr.Dipak P.Ripote, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune-1, Passed Under

Section 133(6)Section 263

…।आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”बी” "ायपीठ पुणेम"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE BEFORE DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.944/PUN/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s.EHealthsystem Health- V The Pr.CIT-1, Care Ltd., s Pune. 1073, BhosateMostique, Opposite Symbiosis, Gokhate Road, Model Colony, Pune – 411016. PAN: AADCN5780C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Pratik Sandbhor - AR Revenue by Mr.Ajaykumar Keshari, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 20/01/2025 Date of pronouncement 31/01/2025 आदेश/ ORDER PER…

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2 vs. M/S Celebi Delhi Cargo Management India Pvt. Ltd

ITA/619/2019HC Delhi30 Jan 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

Section 263Section 80I

…f revision can be exercised only where no enquiry, as required under the law, is done. It is not open to enquire in case of inadequate inquiry. Our view is fortified by the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of CIT vs. Nirav Modi, [2016] 71 Taxmann.com 272 (Bombay). 31. In view of the above discussion on the facts vis a vsi the judicial pronouncements on the subject, we set aside the order of the ld. PCIT and restore that of the Assessing Officer dated 14.03.2104 framed u/s 143(3) of the Act.” 7 OMDA 8 AAI 9 AAI Act Digitally Signed By:KAMLE…

Sonal Sandeep Satav, Pune vs. PCIT, Pune-2, Pune

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 945/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Astha Chandra & Shree G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…expenditure was not revenue expenditure, but an expenditure of capital nature. It is in these circumstances that the exercise of revision jurisdiction was interfered with by this Court. 40. In CIT v. Nirav Modi [2016] 71 taxmann.com 272/241 Taxman 255/[2017] 390 ITR 292 (Bom.), this Court noted that the AO had not only made detailed inquiries, but recorded a finding that the Assessee had duly proved the identity, source and creditworthiness of donors. In these circumstances, the Court held that if two views are possible and the AO has taken one of the possible views, no occasion to exercise powers of revision ca…

Max Hospitals and Allied Services Limited, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai -3, Mumbai

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 2907/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Smt Renu Jauhriassessment Year: 2018-19 Max Hospitals & Principal Allied Services Commissioner Of 401, 4Th Floor, Income Tax Mumbai- 3 Man Excellenza, Room No.612, Vs. S. V. Road, 6Th Floor, Vile Parle (W.), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- 400056 Maharishi Karve Road, Pan: Aagcr9198D Mumbai- 400020. Appellant : Respondent

For Appellant: RespondentFor Respondent: Ms. Sanyogia Nagpal (CIT-DR)

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 56(2)(viib)

…f CIT vs. Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd. reported in (2023) 453 ITR 447 2. Decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of CIT vs. Max India Ltd. reported in (2007) 295 ITR 282 3. Decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in case of CIT vs. Nirav Modi reported in (2017) 390 ITR 292 4. Decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Malabar Industries Ltd. Vs. CIT reported in (2000) 243 ITR 83 5. Decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in case of CIT vs. Development Credit Bank Ltd reported in (2010) 323 ITR 206 3.2. The Ld.AR submitted that, to invoke revisionary proceedings u/s. 263 the twin condition vis; the assessment order…

ITO, Ward-6(1)(1), Ahmedabad vs. Parulben Rajubhai Trivedi, Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1019/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Biren Shah & Shri Gulab Thakor, A.RsFor Respondent: Shri Biren Shah & Shri Gulab Thakor, A.Rs

Section 263Section 68

…isional order and allowed the appeal of assessee. The operating part of the judgment is reproduced as under, - "8.7 In the context of the issue involved, we a/so take note of the decision rendered by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Nirav Modi 390 ITR 292 (Bom.) where in somewhat similar circumstances, the decision of the Tribunal to cancel the order passed under section 263 of the Act was upheld. Thus, driven by the precedent, where the inquiry of 'source of source' is not found to be the requirement of law, the alleged inadequacy in this respect should not be fastened on the assessee. Notwithsta…

Goutam Ghosh, Howrah vs. P.C.I.T., Kolkata - 13, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1080/KOL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Oct 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 263Section 45Section 56(2)(X)Section 56(2)(x)Section 69

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण कोलकाता 'बी' पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA श्री राजपाल यादव, उपाध्यक्ष (कोलकाता क्षेत्र) एवं श्री संजय अवस्थी, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष Before SRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE-PRESIDENT & SRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 1080/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Goutam Ghosh….……………......................................................Appellant [PAN: ADQPG 7993 P] Vs. PCIT, Kolkata-13..................................................................Respondent Appearances: Assessee represented by: Miraj D. Shah, AR. Department represented by: Abhi…

Shankar Roadways, Burdwan vs. ACIT, Cen. Cir. 1(4), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 703/KOL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Sept 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 263Section 40

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘A’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Rakesh Mishra, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.703/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shankar Roadways ………………....….......…....………....Appellant NA Dr. B. C. Roy Avenue, Durgapur, Burdwan-713201 (PAN: AAYFS3240A) vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax ...............................…..…..... Respondent Central-1, Kolkata. Appearances by: Shri Mita Rizvi, AR appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Subhendu Datta, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of con…

Mahendra Kumar Sharma, Churu vs. PCIT (Central), Jaipur

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 725/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Aug 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. R. P. Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 69A

…sue on the allowability of LTCL. Reliance in this regard is 17 Mahendra Kumar Sharma vs. PCIT placed on the decisions of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Gabriel India Ltd reported in 203 ITR 108 (Bom) and in the case of Nirav Modi reported in 390 ITR 292 (Bom). It is also pertinent to note that the Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred by the Revenue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the judgement of Nirav Modi was dismissed in 77 taxmann.com 15 (SC). 10. We also find that the Explanation 2 to section 263 of the Act , which was heavily relied upon by the ld DR before us, would not apply t…

Bnp Paribas, Mumbai vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax (International Taxation) - 1, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2521/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Niraj Sheth, A/RFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Dhyani, CIT, D/R

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 28GSection 37Section 80GSection 80G(5)

…er of revision can be exercised only where no enquiry, as required under the law, is done. It is not open to enquire in case of inadequate inquiry. Our view is fortified by the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of CIT vs. Nirav Modi, [2016] 71 Taxmann.com 272 (Bombay)". 17. The Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of CIT vs. Nirma Chemical Works Ltd. 309 ITR 67 has observed as under: "if assessment order were to incorporate the reasons for upholding the claim made by an assessee, the result would be an epitome and not an assessment order. In this case, during the assessment proceedings for…

M/S Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, Khargone vs. ACIT-2, Indore

In the result the appeals of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 496/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore05 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani(Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatj0529K Assessee By Shri Subhash Jain, Ar Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit Date Of Hearing 29.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 05.06.2024 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Respondent/ Revenue) PAN: AAATJ0529K Assessee by Shri Subhash Jain, AR Revenue by Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, CIT Date of Hearing 29.05.2024 Date of Pronouncement 05.06.2024 O R D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the revision order dated 22.03.2018 of Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 (Ld. PCIT) Indore passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The assessee…

Mohammed Gyasuddin, Kolkata vs. ACIT, Cir.-30, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 571/KOL/2020[2012-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 May 2024AY 2012-12

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण कोलकाता 'बी' पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA श्री संजय गगग, न्याधयक सदस्य एवं श्री संजय अवस्थी, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष Before SRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 571/KOL/2020 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Mohammed Gyasuddin............................................................Appellant [PAN: AFVPG 2465 H] Vs. ACIT, Circle-30, Kolkata.......................................................Respondent Appearances: Assessee represented by: Miraj D. Shah, A/R. Department represented by: Abhijit Kundu, CIT…

Mohammed Gyasuddin, Kolkata vs. ACIT, Cir.-30, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 570/KOL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 May 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण कोलकाता 'बी' पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA श्री संजय गगग, न्याधयक सदस्य एवं श्री संजय अवस्थी, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष Before SRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 570/KOL/2020 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Mohammed Gyasuddin............................................................Appellant [PAN: AFVPG 2465 H] Vs. ACIT, Circle-30, Kolkata.......................................................Respondent Appearances: Assessee represented by: Miraj D. Shah, A/R. Department represented by: Abhijit Kundu, CIT…

M/S Olympus Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. PCIT, Cir-2, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1088/KOL/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 May 2024AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.1088/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S Olympus Suppliers Pvt Ltd.……..…………............…...……………....Appellant 15/B, Clive Row, Kolkata-1. [Pan: Aabco0624Q] Vs. Pcit, Circle-2, Kolkata……….…...............................................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Miraj D. Shah, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 10, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 13, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Revision Order Dated 23.03.2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Pr. Cit’] Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. This Is A Second Round Of Litigation Before Us. Earlier, The Assessee Had Filed Appeal Before This Tribunal Against The Impugned Order Of The Pr. Cit Passed U/S 263 Of The Act, However, The Said Appeal Of The Assessee Was Dismissed Along With Three Other Cases By A Common Order Dated 05.08.2016. Being Aggrieved By The Said Order, The Assessee Preferred Further Appeal Before The Hon’Ble Calcutta High Court Bearing No. Itat/328/2017 Ia No.Ga/2/2017 (Old No.Ga/3184/2017). It Was Pleaded Before The Hon’Ble Calcutta High Court That The Appeal Of The Assessee Was Dismissed Along With Other Appeals, However, The Specific

Section 143(1)Section 151Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘बी’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी "गर"श अ"वाल, लेखा सद"य के सम" Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.1088/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/s Olympus Suppliers Pvt Ltd.……..…………............…...……………....Appellant 15/B, Clive Row, Kolkata-1. [PAN: AABCO0624Q] vs. PCIT, Circle-2, Kolkata……….…...............................................…..…..... Respondent Appearances by: Shri Miraj D. Shah, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT-D…

Ramotar Choudhari HUF, Kolkata vs. PCIT 5 Kolkata, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1336/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No.1336/Kol/2023 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Ramotar Choudhari Huf.……..…………............…...……………....Appellant 7Th Floor, R.N 25 Fortuna Tower, 23A N.S. Road, Kolkata-1. [Pan: Aanhr9093K] Vs. Pcit-5, Kolkata………….…...............................................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. K. Pransukha, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : May 06, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 09, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Revision Order Dated 18.10.2023 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Pr. Cit’] Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In This Appeal Has Agitated Against The Action Of The Pr. Cit In Exercising His Revision Jurisdiction U/S 263 Of The Act & Thereby Directing The Assessing Officer To Frame The Assessment Afresh. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration Declaring Total Income Of Rs.2,55,970/- On 21.01.2014. Thereafter, An Information Was Received By The Assessing Officer From Investigation Wing That The Assessee Has

Section 10(38)Section 142(1)Section 147Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘बी’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.1336/Kol/2023 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Ramotar Choudhari HUF.……..…………............…...……………....Appellant 7th Floor, R.N 25 Fortuna Tower, 23A N.S. Road, Kolkata-1. [PAN: AANHR9093K] vs. PCIT-5, Kolkata………….…...............................................…..…..... Respondent Appearances by: Shri S. K. Pransukha, FCA, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. D…

Sriram Enterprises, Patna vs. PCIT (Central), Patna

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 76/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No. 76/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises,………………………..........Appellant C/O. Nirmal & Associates, Nepali Kothi, Opposite Gasoline Petrol Pump, Boring Road, Patna-800001 [Pan:Aarfs8853J] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,…………………………………..……………..Respondent, Bihar-800001 Appearances By: Shri Nishant Maitin, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : 5Th March, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: May 8Th, 2024 O R D E R

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 263

…ITA No. 76/PAT/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA [Hybrid Court Hearing] Before Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member I.T.A. No. 76/PAT/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises,………………………..........Appellant C/o. Nirmal & Associates, Nepali Kothi, Opposite Gasoline Petrol Pump, Boring Road, Patna-800001 [PAN:AARFS8853J] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna,…………………………………..……………..Respondent, Bihar-800001 Appearances by: Shri Nishant Maitin, C.A., appeared on b…