CIT v. Nirav Modi

77 Taxmann.com 15Supreme Court of India2017#3715 most cited

What is CIT v. Nirav Modi authority for?

A revisional order under section 263 directing the Assessing Officer to enquire into the capacity of donors and decide on the genuineness of gifts, after the Assessing Officer had already made detailed enquiries and accepted the identity, source, and creditworthiness of non-resident donors, is erroneous. The Supreme Court dismissed the revenue's SLP against the High Court's decision upholding the Tribunal's view.

32

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Nirav Modi · section 263 · cash credit · gifts · non-resident donors · identity · source · creditworthiness · capacity of donors · genuineness of gifts · inadequate enquiry · erroneous assessment order · section 68

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 115BBESection 115JBSection 135Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144B

Issues it is cited on

section 256(2)section 256(1)section 256lack of enquiryassessment order erroneoussection 53ainadequate enquirysection 53section 43csection 43casection 153a(1)(a)section 254(2)

Judgments citing CIT v. Nirav Modi

ACIT, CC, Agra vs. Hma Agro Industries Limited, Agra

In the result, ground no.1 raised by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed

ITA 303/AGR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhhma Agro Industries Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle, 2/220, 2Nd Floor, Glory Plaza, Agra. Opp. Soor Sadan, M.G. Road, Agra – 282 002. (Pan :Aacch0450J)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 40ASection 68

…f Tribunal was correct on facts and in law and, thus, SLP filed by revenue against impugned order of High Court was to be dismissed - Held, yes [Paras 2, 4, 5 and 6] [In favour of assessee] ii). Reliance is being placed on the judgment of CIT Vs. Nirav Modi, 77 Taxmann.com 15 (SC), in which, it has been held as under:- 11 ITA No.251/Agr/2025 and 4 ors. “Section 68 read with section 263, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Cash credit (Gift) Assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 - Assessee received certain amount as gifts from his father and sister who were non-residents in India - Assessing Officer after making detail…

ACIT, CC, Agra vs. Hma Agro Industries Limited, Agra

ITA 302/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2022-23
Section 131Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 40ASection 68

…of Tribunal was correct on facts and in law and, thus, SLP filed by revenue against impugned order of High Court was to be dismissed - Held, yes [Paras 2, 4, 5 and 6] [In favour of assessee] ii). Reliance is being placed on the judgment of CIT Vs. Nirav Modi, 77 Taxmann.com 15 (SC), in which, it has been held as under:- “Section 68 read with section 263, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Cash credit (Gift) Assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 - Assessee received certain amount as gifts from his father and sister who were non-residents in India Assessing Officer after making detailed enquiries, took a view that assess…

ACIT, CC, Agra vs. Hma Agro Industries Limited, Agra

In the result, ground no.1 raised by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed

ITA 301/AGR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhhma Agro Industries Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle, 2/220, 2Nd Floor, Glory Plaza, Agra. Opp. Soor Sadan, M.G. Road, Agra – 282 002. (Pan :Aacch0450J)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 40ASection 68

…f Tribunal was correct on facts and in law and, thus, SLP filed by revenue against impugned order of High Court was to be dismissed - Held, yes [Paras 2, 4, 5 and 6] [In favour of assessee] ii). Reliance is being placed on the judgment of CIT Vs. Nirav Modi, 77 Taxmann.com 15 (SC), in which, it has been held as under:- 11 ITA No.251/Agr/2025 and 4 ors. “Section 68 read with section 263, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Cash credit (Gift) Assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 - Assessee received certain amount as gifts from his father and sister who were non-residents in India - Assessing Officer after making detail…

ACIT, CC, Agra vs. Hma Agro Industries Limited, Agra

ITA 300/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 40ASection 68

…l was correct on facts and in law and, thus, SLP filed by revenue against impugned order of High Court was to be dismissed - Held, yes [Paras 2, 4, 5 and 6] [In favour of assessee] ii). Assessee- Reliance is being placed on the judgment of CIT Vs. Nirav Modi, 77 Taxmann.com 15 (SC), in which, it has been held as under:- “Section 68 read with section 263, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Cash credit (Gift) Assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 - Assessee received certain amount as gifts from his father and sister who were non-residents in India Assessing Officer after making detailed enquiries, took a view that assess…

Hma Agro Industries Limited, Agra vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Agra

In the result, ground no.1 raised by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed

ITA 251/AGR/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Dec 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhhma Agro Industries Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle, 2/220, 2Nd Floor, Glory Plaza, Agra. Opp. Soor Sadan, M.G. Road, Agra – 282 002. (Pan :Aacch0450J)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 40ASection 68

…f Tribunal was correct on facts and in law and, thus, SLP filed by revenue against impugned order of High Court was to be dismissed - Held, yes [Paras 2, 4, 5 and 6] [In favour of assessee] ii). Reliance is being placed on the judgment of CIT Vs. Nirav Modi, 77 Taxmann.com 15 (SC), in which, it has been held as under:- 11 ITA No.251/Agr/2025 and 4 ors. “Section 68 read with section 263, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Cash credit (Gift) Assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 - Assessee received certain amount as gifts from his father and sister who were non-residents in India - Assessing Officer after making detail…

Deutsche Investments India Private Limited, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle- 4(2)(1), Mumbai, Mumabi

Appeal is allowed

ITA 3764/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh (Jm) & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara (Am) Deutsche Investments India Pvt. Ltd. Dcit, Circle 4(2)(1) Block B1, Nirlon Knowledge Park, Off 6Th Floor, Room No. Western Express Highway, Goregaon Vs. 642, Aayakar East, Mumbai-400 063. Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020. Pan : Aaccd1765E Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Umashankar PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Sheth
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80G

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Mumbai “D” Bench, Mumbai. Before Shri Pawan Singh (JM) & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara (AM) Deutsche Investments India Pvt. Ltd. DCIT, Circle 4(2)(1) Block B1, Nirlon Knowledge park, Off 6th Floor, Room No. Western Express Highway, Goregaon Vs. 642, Aayakar East, Mumbai-400 063. Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020. PAN : AACCD1765E Appellant Respondent : Shri Niraj Sheth Assessee by : Shri Umashankar Prasad Revenue by : 07/08/2025 Date of Hearing Date of pronouncement : 15/10/2025 O R D E R Per Omkareshwar Chidara (AM) :- The only issue to be adjudicated in this above cited app…

Lupin Limited, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3257/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanassessment Year : 2019-20 Lupin Limited, Principal Commissioner Of 3Rd Floor, Kalpataru Inspire, Income Tax-3, Off Western Express Highway, Vs. Room No. 612, 6Th Floor, Santacruz (East), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400055. Maharshi Karve Road, Pan : Aaacl1069K Mumbai-400020. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rajan Vora & Shri Pranay Gandhi Revenue By : Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vora &For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263Section 43(6)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “A” BENCH : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 Lupin Limited, Principal Commissioner of 3rd Floor, Kalpataru Inspire, Income Tax-3, Off Western Express Highway, vs. Room No. 612, 6th Floor, Santacruz (East), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400055. Maharshi Karve Road, PAN : AAACL1069K Mumbai-400020. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Rajan Vora & Shri Pranay Gandhi Revenue by : Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 06-08-2025 Date of Pronouncement : 30-09-2025 O R…

Bajaj Holdings Amd Investment Limited, Pune vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Mumbai - 3, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3678/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Ms. Vasantiben Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satyaprakash R.Singh, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)Section 80G

…s. PCIT 6. DCIT v. Hinduja Global Solutions Ltd 1 75 Taxmann.com 411 7. DCIT v. Gabriel Ltd 173 Taxmann.com 21 9 8. MOIL V CIT 396 ITR 244 (Bombay) 9. CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd 332 ITR 167 (Delhi) 10. CIT v. Nirav Modi 390 ITR 292 (Bombay) 11. CIT v. Nirav Modi 77 Taxmann.com 15 (SC) 12. Axis Securities Ltd v. PCIT 175 Taxmann.com 982 13. Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Ltd v ACIT ITA 494/Mum/2025 14. Blue Dart Express Ltd. 1101/Mum/2024 4.1 We refer to the decision of Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT Mumbai in the case of ACIT vs. Blue Dart Express Ltd. in ITA No. 1101/Mum/2024), where the Tribunal observed as under: “9. We h…

Avinash Dattatray Muley, Pune vs. PCIT, Pune

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 624/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 48Section 54B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2020-21 Avinash Dattatray Muley PCIT, Pune-2 A – 802, Mont Vert Altesse Sus Road, Vs. Pashan, Pune – 411021 PAN : AIJPM1872F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sarang Gudhate Department by : Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 16-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 22-07-2025 O R D E R PER R. K. PANDA, VP : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 03.03.2025 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter…

Mahendra Kumar Sharma, Churu vs. PCIT (Central), Jaipur

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 725/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Aug 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. R. P. Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 69A

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, “A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 725/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2019-20 cuke Mahendra Kumar Sharma, PCIT (Central) Vs. 21/264 Kaveri Path, Mansarover, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AGMPS 6792 D vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. R. P. Sharma, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Ar…

Hitesh Golchha, Raipur vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed, in terms of our observations herein above

ITA 104/RPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) V. Hitesh Golchha Acit, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [Pan: Agjpg 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. Subramanyam, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. K. Meena, Cit-D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2023

For Appellant: Shri B. Subramanyam, C.AFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Meena, CIT-D.R
Section 153ASection 263Section 43C

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ रायपुर म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH: RAIPUR "ी रवीश सूद , "याियक सद"य, एवं "ी अ"ण खोड"पया, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/RPR/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) v. Hitesh Golchha ACIT, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [PAN: AGJPG 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri B. Subramanya…

Hitesh Golchha, Raipur vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed, in terms of our observations herein above

ITA 103/RPR/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) V. Hitesh Golchha Acit, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [Pan: Agjpg 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. Subramanyam, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. K. Meena, Cit-D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2023

For Appellant: Shri B. Subramanyam, C.AFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Meena, CIT-D.R
Section 153ASection 263Section 43C

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ रायपुर म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH: RAIPUR "ी रवीश सूद , "याियक सद"य, एवं "ी अ"ण खोड"पया, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/RPR/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) v. Hitesh Golchha ACIT, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [PAN: AGJPG 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri B. Subramanya…

Hitesh Golchha, Raipur vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed, in terms of our observations herein above

ITA 102/RPR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) V. Hitesh Golchha Acit, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [Pan: Agjpg 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. Subramanyam, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. K. Meena, Cit-D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2023

For Appellant: Shri B. Subramanyam, C.AFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Meena, CIT-D.R
Section 153ASection 263Section 43C

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ रायपुर म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH: RAIPUR "ी रवीश सूद , "याियक सद"य, एवं "ी अ"ण खोड"पया, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/RPR/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) v. Hitesh Golchha ACIT, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [PAN: AGJPG 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri B. Subramanya…

Hitesh Golchha, Raipur vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Raipur

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed, in terms of our observations herein above

ITA 101/RPR/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) V. Hitesh Golchha Acit, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [Pan: Agjpg 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. Subramanyam, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. K. Meena, Cit-D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2023

For Appellant: Shri B. Subramanyam, C.AFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Meena, CIT-D.R
Section 153ASection 263Section 43C

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ रायपुर म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH: RAIPUR "ी रवीश सूद , "याियक सद"य, एवं "ी अ"ण खोड"पया, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/RPR/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) v. Hitesh Golchha ACIT, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [PAN: AGJPG 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri B. Subramanya…

Vipul M Shah (HUF), Mumbai vs. ITO -17(3)(5), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1030/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Amarjit Singhvipul M Shah (Huf) Vs. The Ito 17(3)(5) 404, Commerce House, Mumbai 140, N.M. Road, Fort, Maharashtra – 400001 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aabhv3153Q Appellant .. Respondent [ Appellant By : Vimal Punamiya Respondent By : Gotimukul Santosh Kumar Date Of Hearing 20.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 16.10.2023

For Appellant: Vimal PunamiyaFor Respondent: Gotimukul Santosh Kumar
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 68

…ioner to arrive at this conclusion that the order dated 29.11.2016 as passed by AO is erroneous, which he did not hold. In this regard, we also find support of law in CIT Vs. Nirav Modi (supra) which has been confirmed by Hon’ble Supreme Court and reported at 77 Taxmann.com 15(SC) 2017. Further, it is apparent on record that the AO has asked the query which was properly replied by assessee along with necessary documents, therefore, after his satisfaction, the AO nowhere made an adverse remark in the order but a legally tenable view has been taken so the commissioner has no power to invoke the provision u/s 263 of…

Smt. Satvir Kaur W/O Sh. Shinder Singh, Ferozepur vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Amritsar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 102/ASR/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR BEFORE DR. M. L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 102/Asr/2022 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Smt. Satvir Kaur V. Pr. Commissioner of Income W/o Sh. Shinder Pal Singh, Tax -1, Amritsar Mahia Wala Kalan, Ferozepur [PAN: AAYPJ 6836F] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AR Respondent by Sh. Girish Bali, CIT- DR Date of Hearing : 17.05.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 29.05.2023 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the L…

Parimal Chandrakant Zaveri, Mumbai vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Vadodara

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 283/AHD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Dec 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Piyush Chhajed, A.RFor Respondent: Shri James Kurian, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year 2015-16 Parimal Chandrakant The Pr. Zaveri Commissioner of 5/9A, Dreamland Vs Income Tax-1, Building, Vadodara New Queen Road, Opera House, (Respondent) Mumbai 400004 Maharashtra PAN: AACPZ2367D (Appellant) Appellant by : Shri Piyush Chhajed, A.R. Respondent by : Shri James Kurian, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 26-09-2022 Date of pronouncement : 16-12-2022 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This is an appeal filed by the Assesse…

Smt. Indermeet Bains W/O Sh. D.S. Bains, Bathinda vs. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda

The appeal of the assessee is disposed of in the term indicated as above

ITA 250/ASR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar19 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal & Sh. P.N. Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR BEFORE DR. M. L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 250/Asr/2019 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Smt. Indermeet Bains Vs. Pr. Commissioner of Income W/o Sh. D.S. Bains, Tax, Bathinda Bathinda [PAN: ACZPB 9945L] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Sudhir Sehgal & Sh. P.N. Arora, Adv. Respondent by: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 28.09.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 19.10.2022 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 28.03.2…

Narinder and Company, Jalandhar vs. Income Tax Officer Ward-3(5), Jalandhar

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 93/ASR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, C.A. and Sh. V.S. AggarwalFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 263p

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR BEFORE DR. M. L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 93/Asr/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Narinder and Company, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Mandi Fentonganj Ward 3(5), Jalandhar 144001, Jalandhar Punjab, India [PAN: AACFN 4502E] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Rohit Kapoor, C.A. and Sh. V.S. Aggarwal Respondent by: Sh. Rohit Sharma, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 20.09.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2022 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the or…

Antariksh Realtors P. Ltd., Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT-12, Mumbai

In the result, appeal is allowed as indicated above

ITA 1626/MUM/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar () & Shri Saktijit Dey ()

Section 143(3)Section 263

…1 ITA 1626/Mum/2020 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR (VICE PRESIDENT) AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) I.T.A. No.1626/Mum/2020 (Assessment year 2015-16) Antariksh Realtors Private Limited vs The Income-tax Officer-12(1)(2), 23, 5th Floor, Dheeraj Plaza, Hill Road Mumbai Bandra (West), Mumbai-400 050 PAN : AAKCS5379G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Shreyash Shah (AR) & Shri Kunal Shah & Shri Ramesh Vora (AR) Respondent by Shri Rajeev Harit [CIT(DR)] Date of hearing 27-07-2021 Date of pronouncement 22-10-2021 O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey (JM) Captioned…

CIT v. Nirav Modi (77 Taxmann.com 15) — Cited in 32 Judgments | BharatTax