CIT v. Nestle India Ltd.
14 Taxmann 99High Court1983#834 most cited
What is CIT v. Nestle India Ltd. authority for?
Club entrance fees, if incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1). Furthermore, an order holding a deductor liable for TDS defaults under Section 201 must be preceded by an inquiry into the deductee's actual tax payment.
125
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2009 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Nestle India Ltd. · Section 37(1) · Section 201 · 296 ITR 682 · club entrance fees · business expenditure · revenue expenditure · TDS default · assessee-in-default · deductee tax payment · Delhi High Court
Also reported as
296 ITR 68211 Taxmann.com 106263 CTR 241