CIT v. MithleshKumari, 921TR 9 (Del)

229 CTR 455High Court#23901 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 50CSection 68Section 69A

Judgments citing CIT v. MithleshKumari, 921TR 9 (Del)

NARSHI GOPALJI MANGE,MUMBAI vs. ITO 27(2)(4), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2064/MUM/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Om Prakash Kant ()

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 69A

…e benches of this Tribunal and various high court in the case of ACIT V. Frontline Realty Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 7472 & 7473/Mum/2018, ITO v. Ramabrahmam 57 SOT 130 (Chennai ITAT), CIT v. K. Raja Gopal Rao-252 ITR 459 (Madras HC),CIT v. Sri Hariram Hotels Pvt Ltd-229 CTR 455 (Karnataka НС),CIT v. Mithlesh Kumari - 92 ITR 9 (Delhi HC), Addl CIT v. K. S. Gupta - 119 ITR 372 (Andhra Pradesh HC), SAS Hotel Ltd v. ITO-4 ITD 297 (Madras ITAT), S. Balan alias Shanmugam Balkrishnan ChettiaF V. DCIT - 120 ITD 469 (Pune ITAT), Praveen Gupta v. ACIT - 137 TTJ 307 (Delhi ITAT} and Burmah Castrol Plc, In re - 175 Taxman 353 (AAR)…

DCIT CEN CIR 3, MUMBAI vs. SWAN ENERGY LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 6662/MUM/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Dec 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajendra, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 6662 & 3870/Mum/2014 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12 & 2010-11) Dcit Cen Cir 3 M/S Swan Energy Ltd. Room No. 905, Pratistha Formerly Known As Swan Mills Ltd, 2Nd Bhavan, Marines Lines, बिधम/ Mumbai-400020. Floor, Feltham House, Vs. Ballard Estate, J.N. Herdia Marg, Mumbai- 400001. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No. Aabcs7890Q & आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 5778 & 2924/Mum/2014 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12 & 2010-11) M/S Swan Energy Ltd. Acit Rg 7(2) Formerly Known As Swan Room No. 626, M. K. बिधम/ Mills Ltd, 2Nd Floor, Feltham Road, Churchgate, Vs. House, Ballard Estate, J.N. Mumbai-400020. Herdia Marg, Mumbai- 400001. अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. J. P. Bairagazd प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondentby : Ms. Abha Kala Chanda सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 27/09/2017 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 06/12/2017 Date Of Pronouncement M/S Swan Energy Ltd..

For Appellant: Sh. J. P. BairagazdFor Respondent: Ms. Abha Kala Chanda
Section 14Section 143(3)Section 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA, AM & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 6662 & 3870/Mum/2014 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12 & 2010-11) DCIT Cen Cir 3 M/s Swan Energy Ltd. Room No. 905, Pratistha Formerly Known as Swan Mills Ltd, 2nd Bhavan, Marines Lines, बिधम/ Mumbai-400020. Floor, Feltham House, Vs. Ballard Estate, J.N. Herdia Marg, Mumbai- 400001. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No. AABCS7890Q & आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 5778 & 2924/Mum/2014 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12 & 2010-11) M/s Swan Energy Ltd. ACIT RG 7(2) Formerly Known as S…

MS.LATA SUBRAMANIAN,BANGALORE vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1570/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2011 – 12

For Appellant: Shri Mallah Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. B. R. Ramesh, JCIT DR
Section 24Section 36

…al before CIT (A) but without success and now the assessee has filed this appeal before us. 4. Learned AR of the assessee placed reliance on a judgment of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Sri Hariram Hotels (P) Ltd. as reported in 229 CTR 455. Learned DR of the revenue supported the assessment order. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. Facts are undisputed as noted above and under these facts, we find no infirmity in the orders of the lower authorities. We also find that as per copy of Computation of Income for AY 2009 – 10 and AY 2010 – 11 available on page 6 and 9 of the p…

CIT v. MithleshKumari, 921TR 9 (Del) (229 CTR 455) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax