CIT v. Margadarshi Chit Funds (P.) Ltd.

19 Taxmann 73High Court1984#23307 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,254 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

rejection of books of accountsection 145(3)section 145income-tax officersection 26section 142scrutiny assessmentsection 68section 142(1)section 143(2)section 144transfer

Judgments citing CIT v. Margadarshi Chit Funds (P.) Ltd.

Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited, Hyderabad vs. ACIT., Circle 3(2), Hyderabad

ITA 821/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 69A

…आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण में, हैदराबाद 'B' बेंच, हैदराबाद IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad श्री रवीश सूद, माननीय न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री मधुसूदन सावडिया, माननीय लेखा सदस्य SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.821/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ष/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited Hyderabad PAN : AAICS8213N (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) Vs. Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-3(1) Hyderabad (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) करदाता का प्रतिनिधित्व/ Assessee Represented by राजस्व का प्रतिनिधित्व/ Departme…

Yogesh Ginning Mill, Prop. Yogesh Chand Gupta, Govindgarh vs. ACIT, Circle I, Alwar

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 540/JPR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: This Tribunal Which Were Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)- 4, Jaipur [ For Short Cit(A) ] Passed On Dates & F For The Assessment Years Mentioned As Tabulated Here In Below, In Turn Those Orders Were Arises Because The Assessee Has Yogesh Ginning Mill Vs. Acit

For Appellant: Shri Paridhi Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Gajendra Singh (Addl.CIT) a
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 250Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 540, 1044 & 1045/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2018-19, 2016-17 & 2017-18 cuke M/s Yogesh Ginning Mill The ACIT, Khesti Wale, Near Sitaram Vs. Circle-1, Alwar. Mandir, Govindgarh, Alwar. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACIPG1584D vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri…

Yogesh Ginning Mill, Prop. Yogesh Chand Gupta, Govindgarh vs. ACIT, Alwar

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1045/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: This Tribunal Which Were Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)- 4, Jaipur [ For Short Cit(A) ] Passed On Dates & F For The Assessment Years Mentioned As Tabulated Here In Below, In Turn Those Orders Were Arises Because The Assessee Has Yogesh Ginning Mill Vs. Acit

For Appellant: Shri Paridhi Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Gajendra Singh (Addl.CIT) a
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 250Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 540, 1044 & 1045/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2018-19, 2016-17 & 2017-18 cuke M/s Yogesh Ginning Mill The ACIT, Khesti Wale, Near Sitaram Vs. Circle-1, Alwar. Mandir, Govindgarh, Alwar. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACIPG1584D vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri…

CIT v. Margadarshi Chit Funds (P.) Ltd. (19 Taxmann 73) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax