Asst.C.I.T., Mangalore vs. M/S Hassan Hajee & Co, Mangalore
In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos
ITA 1363/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2022AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai
For Appellant: Sri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Praveen Karanth, D.R
…uent year. 28. Such rule of consistency has been followed by the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v B Amrutha Lakshmi 300 ITR 78, CIT v Moonlight Builders and Developers 307 ITR 197, by Rajasthan High Court in the case of CIT v Malborough Polychem P. Ltd. 309 ITR 43 and by Bangalore Bench in the case of Tally Solutions Pvt. Ltd. V. DCIT. 29. The learned CIT(A) has enhanced the income by Rs.2,70,70,745/- after making certain observations. According to the learned CIT(A), the recipients have not maintained any books of accounts. All the recipients have given the same answers and the AO has asked the same quest…