CIT v. Maithan International

375 ITR 123High Court2015#894 most cited

What is CIT v. Maithan International authority for?

An assessment order becomes erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, allowing revision under Section 263, if the Assessing Officer fails to conduct a proper and adequate inquiry into the genuineness, identity, and creditworthiness of share application money or other cash credits under Section 68.

119

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Maithan International · Section 263 Income Tax Act 1961 · Section 68 Income Tax Act 1961 · inadequate inquiry by AO · erroneous and prejudicial to revenue · revisionary power of CIT · share application money · unexplained cash credit · genuineness and creditworthiness · lack of inquiry · Malabar Industrial · accommodation entry

Also reported as

56 Taxmann.com 283231 Taxmann 381277 CTR 65

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Maithan International