CIT v. Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.

200 ITR 275High Court1993#13753 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.

SURESH CHAND,GURGAON vs. ITO,WARD 4(1),GURGAON, GURGAON

Appeal is allowed

ITA 4110/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahmanita No. 4110/Del/2024 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Suresh Chand, Vs Income Tax Officer, C/O Ca M R Sahu, House No. 651, Ward-4(1), 1St Floor, Sector-10A, Near G. D. Gurgaon, Goenka Public School, Gurgaon, Haryana-122016 Haryana-122001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aoopk7257H Assessee By : Sh. M. R. Sahu, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Mahesh Kumar Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.07.2025 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara: This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2013-14, Arises Against The Cit(A)/Nfac, Delhi’S Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2024-25/1066753639(1) Dated 16.07.2024, In Proceedings U/S 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”).

For Appellant: Sh. M. R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Mahesh Kumar CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151A

…peal raised above. Reliance in this regard is placed upon the decisions in the cases of "National Thermal Power Corporation vs. CIT (1998) 229 ITR 383 (SC)", "VMT Spinning Co. Ltd Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 326 (P&H)", CIT Vs. Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd [1993] 200 ITR 275 (Del. HC)," Taylor Instrument Co. (India) Ltd Vs.CIT [1992] 198 ITR 1 (Del. HC).” 3 Suresh Chand 4. The Revenue vehemently objects to the assessee's aforesaid application for admission of additional grounds that the same deserve to be rejected since filed at this belated stage. We find no merit in the Revenue's instant technical objections in li…

CIT v. Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. (200 ITR 275) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax