CIT v. Madhsy Films Pvt Ltd.

175 Taxmann 347High Court2008#12287 most cited
8

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2022.

Read the full judgment

Judgments citing CIT v. Madhsy Films Pvt Ltd.

Sri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Prop: M/S. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Sundargarh vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 175/CTK/2019[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri B.Panda, Sr. Adv/Shri B.Panda, AdvFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT (
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.170 to 175/CTK/2019 170 to 175/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 to 2015 10 to 2015-16 Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, LL26, Civil Township, Rourke…

Sri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Prop: M/S. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Sundargarh vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 174/CTK/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri B.Panda, Sr. Adv/Shri B.Panda, AdvFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT (
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.170 to 175/CTK/2019 170 to 175/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 to 2015 10 to 2015-16 Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, LL26, Civil Township, Rourke…

Sri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Prop: M/S. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Sundargarh vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 173/CTK/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri B.Panda, Sr. Adv/Shri B.Panda, AdvFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT (
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.170 to 175/CTK/2019 170 to 175/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 to 2015 10 to 2015-16 Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, LL26, Civil Township, Rourke…

Sri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Prop: M/S. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Sundargarh vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 172/CTK/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri B.Panda, Sr. Adv/Shri B.Panda, AdvFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT (
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.170 to 175/CTK/2019 170 to 175/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 to 2015 10 to 2015-16 Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, LL26, Civil Township, Rourke…

Sri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Prop: M/S. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Sundargarh vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 171/CTK/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri B.Panda, Sr. Adv/Shri B.Panda, AdvFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT (
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.170 to 175/CTK/2019 170 to 175/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 to 2015 10 to 2015-16 Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, LL26, Civil Township, Rourke…

Sri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Prop: M/S. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Sundargarh vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 170/CTK/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri B.Panda, Sr. Adv/Shri B.Panda, AdvFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT (
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.170 to 175/CTK/2019 170 to 175/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 to 2015 10 to 2015-16 Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Shri Narayan Kumar Khaitan, Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur ACIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, Prop. M/s. Sri Ganesh Metaliks, LL26, Civil Township, Rourke…

Sh. Sukhpal Chowdhary, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 342/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Dec 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri T. R. Talwar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. K. Chaudhary
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Through Video Conferencing) ITA. No. 342/Del/2013 (Assessment Year: 2008-09) Shri Sukh Pal Choudhary, ACIT, 1417/3, Rajiv Nagar, Vs. Gali No. 7, Gurgaon, Circle : 23 (1), Haryana – 122 002. PAN: AOFPS7431E New Delhi. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri T. R. Talwar, Advocate; Department by: Shri H. K. Chaudhary [CIT] – D.R.; Date of Hearing : 06/10/2021 Date of pronouncement : 07/12/2021 O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J. M. 1. This appeal by the asses…

M/S. Micro Spacematrix Solution Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 669/DEL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Shri P. DAM Kanunjna, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

…es because at that point of time postal receipt and tracking delivery number was not issued to the sender. The ld. DR placing reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT Vs. 11 Madhsy Films P. Ltd reported at 175 Taxmann 347 [Del] submitted that where notice issued to the assessee u/s 143(2) of the Act had been dispatched by speed post at the address as per it return and the same has not been received back, it could be presumed that it reached the assessee and if the notice is handed over to the postal authorities for service, then it would be presumed that the n…

CIT v. Madhsy Films Pvt Ltd. (175 Taxmann 347) — Cited in 8 Judgments | BharatTax