CIT v. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd.

216 CTR 195Supreme Court of India2008#57 most cited

What is CIT v. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. authority for?

If an assessee company receives share application money from alleged bogus shareholders and provides their details to the Assessing Officer, no addition can be made under Section 68 in the company's hands; the Department must proceed against the shareholders by reopening their individual assessments.

854

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,369 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. · Section 68 · share application money · bogus shareholders · creditworthiness of creditor · genuineness of transaction · addition u/s 68 · reopening assessments of shareholders · 216 CTR 195 · Supreme Court 2008

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd.

Rajshree Electricals & Associate Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar vs. ITO, Ward-1(3), Bhubaneswar

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 73/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 Aug 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.73/Ctk/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Rajshree Electricals & Vs. Ito, Ward-1(3), Bhubaneswar Associate Private Limited, 1St Floor, Ddl-556, Phase-Ii, Dumduma Housing Board Colony, Dumduma, Bhubaneswar-751019 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aafcr 6010 B (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Purna Chandra Mishra, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Citdr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 28/08/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 31/08/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)- 2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 10.11.2017 Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0187/2016- 17 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1. That The Ld. Commissioner Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Bhubaneswar Is Not Justified In Confirming The Addition Of Rs.18,00,000/- Made By The Ao Under The Head Unexplained Share Capital On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. That The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2 Bhubaneswar Should Have Considered The Written Submission Dt.15.9.2917(Page -9 To 11) Wherein All Details Of Creditor-Director, Smt.Urmila Tripathy I.E. Identity, Genuineness Of Transaction, Creditworthiness Of Financial Strength & Detailed Address With Permanent Account Number Were Given. 3. That The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2 Bhubaneswar Should Have Considered The Investment Of Rs.18,00,000/- Made By The Director, Smt. Urmila Tripathy In The Hands Of The Director Instead Of In The Hands Of Assessee-Company In The Light Of Supreme Court’S Decision

For Appellant: Shri Purna Chandra Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, CITDR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कटक "यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI N.S.SAINI, AM & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.73/CTK/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/s Rajshree Electricals & Vs. ITO, Ward-1(3), Bhubaneswar Associate Private Limited, 1st Floor, DDL-556, Phase-II, Dumduma Housing Board Colony, Dumduma, Bhubaneswar-751019 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAFCR 6010 B (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Purna Chandra Mishra, AR राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Subhendu Dutta, CITDR सु…

ITO 12(2)(3), Mumbai vs. Ggf Industries Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby ordered to be dismissed

ITA 6006/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Aug 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G. S. Pannu, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.6006/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Ito 12(2)(3), Room No. बिधम/ M/S. Ggf Industries Pvt. 226, 2Nd Floor, Aayakar Ltd. A-303, Bhattad Tower, Vs. 3Rd Floor, Opp. Kora Kendra Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. Ground, Borivali West, Mumbai-400092. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabcg3856E (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Ram Tiwari (Sr. Ar) Assessee By: Shri Ajay R. Singh सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 17.05.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03.08.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 29.07.2016 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The Ay. 2009-10. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: -

For Appellant: Shri Ajay R. SinghFor Respondent: Shri Ram Tiwari (Sr. AR)
Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 68

…anies were regularly doing the business and had filed their tax returns on regular basis. The taxes were paid by them on the income so earned. In the light of observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. reported in 216 CTR 295, the onus on the appellant has been duly discharged. The peculiar facts of the case may have caused suspicion in the mind of the A,O. but there is no evidence or other material to hold that the appellant had routed its own money. 6.5 On an analysis of the facts on records, it is seen that the share application money and share premium of Rs, 2,25,…

Idhasoft Ltd., Mumbai vs. DCIT - 15(2)(1), Mumbai

ITA 5139/MUM/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jul 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhanassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S Idhasoft Ltd. Dcit-15(2)(1), 3, Narayan Building, Room No.357, 3Rd Floor बनाम/ 23 L. N. Road, Dadar East, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400014 M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) P.A. No. Aabci6090G Assessment Year: 2007-08 Dcit-15(2)(1), M/S Idhasoft Ltd. Room No.357, 3Rd Floor 3, Narayan Building, बनाम/ Aayakar Bhavan, 23 L. N. Road, Dadar East, Vs. M. K. Road, Mumbai-400014 Mumbai-400020 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) P.A. No. Aabci6090G

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ, जे, मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “J”, MUMBAI "ी जो"ग"दर "संह, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एन. के. "धान, लेखा सद"य, के सम" Before Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member, and Shri N.K. Pradhan, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/s Idhasoft Ltd. DCIT-15(2)(1), 3, Narayan Building, Room No.357, 3rd Floor बनाम/ 23 L. N. Road, Dadar East, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400014 M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) P.A. No. AABCI6090G Assessment Year: 2007-08 DCIT-15(2)(1), M/s Idhasoft Ltd. Room No.357, 3rd Floor 3, Narayan Building,…

Asst CIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs. Bhakti Homes P.Ltd, Navi Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1233/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumaracit-15(1)(2), M/S Bhakti Homes Pvt. Ltd. Room No.483,A, 4Th Floor, 301, Sitaram Kutir, Plot No. 28, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Vs. Sector-21, Nerul, Road, Mumbai-400020. Navi Mumbai-400706 Pan: Aaccb6937C Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri T.A. Khan (Cit-Dr) Respondent By : Shri Rashmikant C. Modi With Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke (Ar) Date Of Hearing : 23.05.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2018 Orderunder Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act Per Pawan Singh;

For Appellant: Shri T.A. Khan (CIT-DR)For Respondent: Shri Rashmikant C. Modi with Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke (AR)
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 143(4)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 68

…hearing no specific case law was refereed by ld. AR for the assessee. However, the ld AR for the assessee has relied upon the following decision; 1 CIT vs. Gagandeep Infrastructure Pvt. (ITA No. 1613 of 2014 dated 20.03.2017. 2 CIT vs. Lovely Exports [2008] 216 CTR 195 (SC). 3 DCIT vs. Rohini Builders (2002) 256 ITR 360 Gujarat HC. 4 Rohini Builders vs. DYCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad (2001) 117 Taxmann 25. 5 PCIT vs. Veedhata Tower Pvt. Ltd. ITA No. 819 of 2015 (Bom HC). 6 ITO vs. Anant Shelters (P.) Ltd. (2012) 20 Taxmann 153 Mumbai ITAT. 7 Shri Naresh Hiran vs. ITO (ITA No. 1236/Mum/2017 (Mum ITAT). 8 ACIT vs. H K Puj…