CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc.

49 Taxmann.com 257High Court2014#700 most cited

What is CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc. authority for?

Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, cannot exceed the actual tax-exempt income earned by the assessee during the relevant year. If no tax-exempt income is earned, no disallowance under Section 14A is warranted.

145

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc. · Section 14A disallowance · Rule 8D · exempt income expenditure · limit of disallowance · no disallowance if no exempt income · 226 Taxmann 45 · expenditure related to exempt income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc.

M/S Sudhakar Barter Pvt. Ltd.(Now Sudhakar Barter LLP), New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-1(3), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 141/KOL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Mar 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.141/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S Sudhakar Barter Pvt. Ltd (Now Sudhakar Barter Llp) …….......... .........................................……….……Appellant 2Nd Floor, C-11, Shivalik Colony, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi [Pan: Aakcs5649E] Vs. Ito, Ward-1(3), Kolkata..……….…..…...............……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 31, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 31, 2022

Section 14ASection 250Section 250(6)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.141/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s Sudhakar Barter Pvt. Ltd (Now Sudhakar Barter LLP) …….......... .........................................……….……Appellant 2nd Floor, C-11, Shivalik Colony, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi [PAN: AAKCS5649E] vs. ITO, Ward-1(3), Kolkata..……….…..…...............……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concludin…

DCIT, Cir.-4(1), Kolkata vs. M/S Asharam Leasing and Finance (P) Ltd, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 15/KOL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.15/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Dcit, Circle-4(1), Kolkata………………………………………….……Appellant Vs. M/S Asharam Leasing & Finance (P) Ltd…..……......……...…..…..Respondent Cf-361, Salt Lake City, Sector-1, Kolkata-700064. [Pan: Aacca1516G] Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 09, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 09, 2021 Hearing Through Video Conferencing Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 03.09.2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Revenue In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. For The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & In Facts In Deleting The Disallowance U/S 14A Of Rs.3,50,07,137/- Without Considering The Facts Of The Case. 2. That The Appellant Craves Leave To Add To And/Or Alter, Amend, Modify Or Rescind The Grounds Hereinabove Before Of Hearing Of This Appeal.” No One Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of The Assessee Despite Notice. Therefore, 2. We Proceed To Adjudicate The Present Appeal After Hearing The Ld. Dr.

Section 14ASection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” (Virtual Court Hearing) BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.15/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2015-16 DCIT, Circle-4(1), Kolkata………………………………………….……Appellant vs. M/s Asharam Leasing And Finance (P) Ltd…..……......……...…..…..Respondent CF-361, Salt Lake City, Sector-1, Kolkata-700064. [PAN: AACCA1516G] Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : December 09, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order :…

M/S Kanade Aqua Farms Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 6 (3)(3), Mumbai

Accordingly, the Ground of appeal No. 1 is dismissed

ITA 151/MUM/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya () & Shri Ravish Sood () M/S Kanade Aqua Farms Income Tax Officer- Pvt. Ltd., 3/21, Poddar Vs. 6(3)(3), Building No. 2, Dr. Room No. 524, 5Th Floor, Maisheri Road, Near Aaykar Bhavan, Sandhurst Road Railway M.K. Marg, Station, Mumbai– 400009 Mumbai - 400020 Pan No. Aaack0421C (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee By : Ms.Vinita Shah, A.R Revenue By : Shri Neeraj Kumar, D.R Date Of Hearing : 08/09/2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 20/09/2021 Order Per Ravish Sood, J.M: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Mumbai (For Short „Cit(A)‟), Dated 03.10.2019, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The A.O. U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short „Act‟) Dated 13.11.2016 . 2. The Assessee Has Assailed The Impugned Order On The Following Grounds Of Appeal Before Us: 1. “On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case As Well As In Law, The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of Learned Assessing Officer In Disallowing The Clearing Expenses Of Rs.

For Appellant: Ms.Vinita Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Neeraj Kumar, D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194CSection 40

…ITA No. 151/Mum/2020 A.Y. 2014-15 1 M/s Kanade Aqua Farms Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO 6(3)(3) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) M/s Kanade Aqua Farms Income Tax Officer- Pvt. Ltd., 3/21, Poddar Vs. 6(3)(3), Building No. 2, Dr. Room No. 524, 5th Floor, Maisheri Road, Near Aaykar Bhavan, Sandhurst Road Railway M.K. Marg, Station, Mumbai– 400009 Mumbai - 400020 PAN No. AAACK0421C (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee by : Ms.Vinita Shah, A.R Revenue by : Shri Neeraj Kumar, D.R Date of Hearing : 08/09/2021 Date of prono…

International Cargo Terminals and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT CC 6(4), Mumbai

Accordingly, in terms of our aforesaid observations, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6974/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman () & Shri Ravish Sood () The Dcit, Central Circle-6(4), M/S International Cargo Room No. 1925, 19Th Floor, Air Vs. Terminals & Infrastructure India Building, Nariman Point, Private Limited, Unit No.801, Mumbai – 400 021 Godrej Coliseum, C-Wing, Off Somaiya Hospital Road, Sion (East), Mumbai 400 022 Pan No. Aaacu5182C (Revenue) (Assessee) M/S International Cargo The Dcit, Central Circle-6(4), Terminals & Infrastructure Vs. Room No. 1925, 19Th Floor, Air Private Limited, Unit No.801, India Building, Nariman Point, Godrej Coliseum, C-Wing, Mumbai – 400 021 Off Somaiya Hospital Road, Sion (East),Mumbai 400 022

For Appellant: Shri Y.P. Trivedi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshi, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

…ITA Nos. 6892 & 6974/Mum/2019 A.Y. 2016-17 1 The DCIT, Central Circle-6(4) Vs. M/s International Cargo Terminals & Infrastructure P. Ltd. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) The DCIT, Central Circle-6(4), M/s International Cargo Room No. 1925, 19th Floor, Air Vs. Terminals & Infrastructure India Building, Nariman Point, Private Limited, Unit No.801, Mumbai – 400 021 Godrej Coliseum, C-Wing, Off Somaiya Hospital Road, Sion (East), Mumbai 400 022 PAN No. AAACU5182C (Revenue) (Assessee) M/s Internatio…

Dy CIT CC 6 (4), Mumbai vs. M/S International Cargo Terminals & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd., Mumbai

Accordingly, in terms of our aforesaid observations, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6892/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman () & Shri Ravish Sood () The Dcit, Central Circle-6(4), M/S International Cargo Room No. 1925, 19Th Floor, Air Vs. Terminals & Infrastructure India Building, Nariman Point, Private Limited, Unit No.801, Mumbai – 400 021 Godrej Coliseum, C-Wing, Off Somaiya Hospital Road, Sion (East), Mumbai 400 022 Pan No. Aaacu5182C (Revenue) (Assessee) M/S International Cargo The Dcit, Central Circle-6(4), Terminals & Infrastructure Vs. Room No. 1925, 19Th Floor, Air Private Limited, Unit No.801, India Building, Nariman Point, Godrej Coliseum, C-Wing, Mumbai – 400 021 Off Somaiya Hospital Road, Sion (East),Mumbai 400 022

For Appellant: Shri Y.P. Trivedi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshi, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

…ITA Nos. 6892 & 6974/Mum/2019 A.Y. 2016-17 1 The DCIT, Central Circle-6(4) Vs. M/s International Cargo Terminals & Infrastructure P. Ltd. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) The DCIT, Central Circle-6(4), M/s International Cargo Room No. 1925, 19th Floor, Air Vs. Terminals & Infrastructure India Building, Nariman Point, Private Limited, Unit No.801, Mumbai – 400 021 Godrej Coliseum, C-Wing, Off Somaiya Hospital Road, Sion (East), Mumbai 400 022 PAN No. AAACU5182C (Revenue) (Assessee) M/s Internatio…