CIT v. La Medica

250 ITR 575High Court2001#665 most cited

What is CIT v. La Medica authority for?

When purchases are shown to be non-genuine, the entire amount is to be disallowed as unexplained expenditure under section 69C, irrespective of whether the goods were procured from alternative sources.

150

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. La Medica · 250 ITR 575 · section 69C · bogus purchases · 100% disallowance · unexplained expenditure · non-genuine purchases · rejection of books of account · entire disallowance · section 145(3)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. La Medica

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 11(1)(2), Mumbai vs. Sanghvi Star Retail Private Limited, Mumbai

Accordingly, grounds raised in CO and case laws relied on by assessee are dismissed

ITA 5334/MUM/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 5334/Mum/2017 & Cross Objection No.– 01/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S Sanghvi Star Retail Acit – 11(1)(2), Pvt. Ltd. Room No. 1, Ground बिधम/ Plot No. 75, C-14, Cross Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Road, Marol Midc, Vs. M. K. Road, Anderi (East), Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai- 400 093 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan No. Aalcs5646N (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant Shri V. Vinod Kumar, Dr : By प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondentby : Shri Suchek Anchaliya, Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 09.10.2019 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 31.10.2019 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman: The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 18 In Short Referred As ‘Ld. Cit(A)’, Mumbai, Dated 10.04.17 For Assessment Year (In Short Ay) 2009-10. 2

For Respondent: Shri Suchek Anchaliya, AR
Section 132Section 133Section 143

…t where assessee inflated expenditure by showing higher purchase price through fictitious invoices in name of 33 fictitious parties, Tribunal was justified in disallowing 25 per cent of purchase price. 4. CIT Vs La Medica [2001] 117 Taxman 628 (Delhi)/[2001] 250 ITR 575 (Delhi)[2001] 168 CTR 314 (Delhi) where Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that Assessee having failed to produce evidence to prove bona fides of seller from whom it claimed to have purchased raw material, Assessing Officer treated value of raw 12 I.T.A. No. 5334/Mum/2017 M/s Sanghvi Star Retail Pvt. Ltd. material as assessee's income from undisclo…

Income Tax Officer-19(3)(3), Mumbai vs. Shri Shankarlal L. Jain, Mumbai

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed and the revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 427/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar (Am) & Shri Ram Lal Negi (Jm) Assessment Year: 2009-2010 Shri Shankarlal L. Jain, The Ito-18(3)(3), 577/579, Om Shanti Bhavan, (Erstwhile Ito 19(3)(3), Khatavi Building, Jss Rd, Earnest House, Opp. Chandanwadi, Vs. Mumbai Mumbai - 400002 Pan: Aabpj3924F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2009-2010 The Ito-19(3)(3), Shri Shankarlal L. Jain, Matru Mandir, 2Nd Floor, Bokadia Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., R. No. 219, Tardeo Road, 577/579, Om Shanti Bhavan, Mumbai - 400007 Vs. Khatavi Building, Jss Rd, Opp. Chandanwadi, Mumbai - 400002 Pan: Aabpj3924F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rajesh Sanghvi (Ca) Revenue By : Shri Chaudhary Arun Kumar Singh (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 25/04/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 19/07/2019

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Sanghvi (CA)For Respondent: Shri Chaudhary Arun Kumar Singh (DR)
Section 143Section 148

…Supreme Court in the case of N.K. Proteins Ltd. vs. CIT (2017 TIOL 23 SC-IT), Pr. CIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. Civil Appeal No. …., the judgments of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Arun Malhotra 363 ITR 195 (Delhi), CIT vs. La Medica 250 ITR 575 (Delhi) Pr. CIT vs. NDR Promoters Pvt. Ltd. ITA No. 49 of 2018 and the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Vijay Proteins Ltd. vs. AICT (2015) 58 taxmann.com 44 (Guj). The Ld. DR further pointed out that the revenue has challenged the impugned order by filing cross appeal on the ground that the findings of the Ld. CIT (A) ar…