CIT v. Kwality Steel Suppliers Complex

395 ITR 1Supreme Court of India2017#1176 most cited

What is CIT v. Kwality Steel Suppliers Complex authority for?

An assessment order can be revised under Section 263 only if it is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. This revisionary power cannot be exercised when the Assessing Officer adopted a permissible view or where there was merely inadequate enquiry, as distinct from a complete lack of enquiry.

97

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,459 Indian tax judgments — from 2013 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Kwality Steel Suppliers Complex · Section 263 · revisionary power · erroneous and prejudicial to revenue · lack of enquiry · inadequate enquiry · Assessing Officer permissible view · two views possible · Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. · Max India Ltd. · scope of revision

Also reported as

250 Taxmann 23

Sections most often in play

Section 263Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 139(1)Section 147Section 115BBESection 131Section 132
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

national tax tribunalsection 108section 117section 116section 46section 54ecinadequate enquirymalabar industrialsection 131(1)section 54bsection 114lack of enquiry

Judgments citing CIT v. Kwality Steel Suppliers Complex

Sureshbhai Balubhai Asodariya, Surat vs. Pr. CIT (Central)Circle, Surat

In the result, this appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 65/SRT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 254(1)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 64 to 70/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2018-19) (Physical hearing) Sureshbhai Babubhai Asodariya, Pr.C.I.T., 20, Sadhana Society, Mtawadi, (Central) Circle, Vs. L.H. Road, Surat-395006. Surat. PAN No. AEEPA 5402 Q Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Ashok B Koli, CIT-DR Date of hearing 20/01/2023 Date of pronouncement 25/01/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER:…

Sureshbhai Balubhai Asodariya, Surat vs. Pr. CIT (Central)Circle, Surat

In the result, this appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 64/SRT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 254(1)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 64 to 70/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2018-19) (Physical hearing) Sureshbhai Babubhai Asodariya, Pr.C.I.T., 20, Sadhana Society, Mtawadi, (Central) Circle, Vs. L.H. Road, Surat-395006. Surat. PAN No. AEEPA 5402 Q Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Ashok B Koli, CIT-DR Date of hearing 20/01/2023 Date of pronouncement 25/01/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER:…

Labdhi Jewellerd Pvt. Ltd., Na

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 106/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Dec 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.104 & 106/Srt/2022 (Ay 2017-18) (Hearing In Physical Court) K.N. Diamond, 5/4299, Ground Floor, Principal Commissioner Of Soniwad, Bilimora, Dist. Income-Tax, Valsad, Room Navsari, Gujarat-396321 No. 301, 3Rd Floor, Pan No. Aadfk 3167 H Vs Income-Tax Office, Palak Arcade, Pali, Shantinagar, Labdhi Jewellerd Pvt. Ltd. Tithal Road, Valsad, Soniwad, Bilimora, Dist. Gujarat-396001 Navsari, Gujarat-396321 Pan No. Aabcl 1645 A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 263

…ken on different view, the order passed by ld. PCIT under section 263 cannot be revised. To support his submission, ld. AR for the assessee relied upon following decision:  Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT 243 ITR 83 (SC)  Kwality Steel Suppliers vs. CIT 395 ITR 1 (SC)  CIT vs. Mehsana District Co-Op.Milk Producers Union Ltd. 263 ITR 645 (Guj)  CIT vs. D.P.Karia 266 ITR 113 (Guj)  CIT vs. Arvind Jewellers 259 ITR 502 (Guj)  Sir Dorabji Tata Trust vs. DCIT€ (2921) 188 ITD 38 (Mum-Trib)  Torrent Pharmaceuticals vs. DCIT (2921) 173 ITD 130 (Ahd)  Minal Shah vs. PCIT 57 CCH 140) (Ahd) 10. The Ld. AR of the…

K. N. Diamond, Na

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 104/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Dec 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.104 & 106/Srt/2022 (Ay 2017-18) (Hearing In Physical Court) K.N. Diamond, 5/4299, Ground Floor, Principal Commissioner Of Soniwad, Bilimora, Dist. Income-Tax, Valsad, Room Navsari, Gujarat-396321 No. 301, 3Rd Floor, Pan No. Aadfk 3167 H Vs Income-Tax Office, Palak Arcade, Pali, Shantinagar, Labdhi Jewellerd Pvt. Ltd. Tithal Road, Valsad, Soniwad, Bilimora, Dist. Gujarat-396001 Navsari, Gujarat-396321 Pan No. Aabcl 1645 A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 263

…ken on different view, the order passed by ld. PCIT under section 263 cannot be revised. To support his submission, ld. AR for the assessee relied upon following decision:  Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT 243 ITR 83 (SC)  Kwality Steel Suppliers vs. CIT 395 ITR 1 (SC)  CIT vs. Mehsana District Co-Op.Milk Producers Union Ltd. 263 ITR 645 (Guj)  CIT vs. D.P.Karia 266 ITR 113 (Guj)  CIT vs. Arvind Jewellers 259 ITR 502 (Guj)  Sir Dorabji Tata Trust vs. DCIT€ (2921) 188 ITD 38 (Mum-Trib)  Torrent Pharmaceuticals vs. DCIT (2921) 173 ITD 130 (Ahd)  Minal Shah vs. PCIT 57 CCH 140) (Ahd) 10. The Ld. AR of the…

Samir Yogendrabhai Parikh, Na

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 102/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Hearing) Samir Yogendrabhai Parikh. The Pr.Cit, Alka Society, Chhapara Road, Valsad. Vs. Dist.-Navsari-396445, Gujarat. Pan No. Abgpp 6727 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 263

…isdiction to revise the assessment order. To 13 Samir Yogendrabhai Parikh Vs. Pr.CIT support his submission, the ld. Sr. Counsel has relied upon the following decisions: (i) Malabar Industrial Co Ltd. Vs CIT 243 ITR 83 (SC) (ii) Kwality Steel Suppliers Vs CIT 395 ITR 1 (SC) (iii) CIT Vs Mehsana District Co-Op Milk Producers Union Ltd. 263 ITR 645 (Guj) (iv) CIT Vs D.P. Karia 266 ITR 113 (Guj) (v) CIT Vs Arvind Jewellers 259 ITR 502 (Guj) (vi) Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Vs DCIT(E) (2021) 188 ITD 38 (Mum) (vii)Torrent Pharmaceuticals Vs DCIT (2021) 173 ITD 130 (Ahd.) 10. The ld. Senior Counsel submits that inadequacy o…

Veer Plastics Pvt. Ltd, Ahmedabad vs. The Pr. CIT -4, Ahmedabad

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 456/AHD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Adv. & ShriFor Respondent: ShriA. P. Singh, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263Section 32(1)(iia)Section 80I

…view could have been taken doesn't justify proceedings u/s 263. The Ld. AR relied upon the followings decisions: " Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT - 243 ITR 83 (SC); Veer Plastics Pvt. Ltd.vs.Pr. CIT Asst.Year –2017-18 " Kwality Steel Suppliers vs. CIT - 395 ITR 1 (SC); " CIT vs. Mehsana District Co-op. Milk Producers Union Ltd. - 263 ITR 645 (Guj) " CIT vs. D. P. Karia - 266 ITR 113 (Guj); " CIT vs. Arvind Jewellers - 259 ITR 502 (Guj); " Sir Dorabji Tata Trust vs. DCIT(E) - (2021) 188 ITD 38 (Mum); " Torrent Pharmaceutical. vs DCIT -(2021) 173 ITD 130 (Ahd); The Ld. AR submitted that "Inadequacy" of inquir…

Om Prakash Agarwal, Jaipur vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-1, Jaipur

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 204/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Us. In This Appeal The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

For Appellant: Shri Praveen Saraswat (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal (CIT)
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’B’ JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 204/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2017-18 cuke Om Prakash Agarwal Principal Commissioner of Vs. 256, Chhoti Chaupar, Income Tax, Jaipur-1, Jaipur. Jaipur-302003. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABWPA 2846 D vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Praveen Saraswat (C.A.)…

Sh. Surender Meena, 36, Pratap Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur vs. PCIT-1, Jaipur

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 162/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jul 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Avdhesh Kumar (CIT)
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54Section 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’A’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM deys’k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 162/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2017-18 cuke Shri Surender Meena PCIT, Vs. 36, Pratap Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur-1 Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACFPM 8554Q vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Avdhesh Kumar…

Sh. Narendar Kumar Agarwal, Jawali Bhawan, Station Road, Alwar vs. PCIT, Jaipur-1, Jaipur

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 133/JPR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jul 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Avdhesh Kumar (CIT)
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 271FSection 50CSection 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’A’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM deys’k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 133/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2012-13 cuke Sh. Narendra Kumar Agarwal PCIT, Vs. Jawali Bhawan, Station Road, Jaipur-1 Alwar LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AKEPA 0553 E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Avdhesh Ku…

Shree Balaji Engicons Pvt. Ltd, Jharsuguda vs. Principal CIT, Sambalpur

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 195/CTK/2019[204-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.193/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Rawats-Balaji(Jv), Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aabar 9061 J Tan No. : Bbnr01647 C & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.194/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Sbepl-Gril(Jv), Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aafas 2639 R Tan No. : Bbns04348 B & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.195/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Shree Balaji Engicons Pvt Ltd Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aagcs 4292 P Tan No. : Bbns00091 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, Ar िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Citdr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 26/10/2021 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23/12/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Three Appeals Have Been Filed By Three Different Assessees Against The Order Passed By The Pr.Cit, Sambalpur, U/S.263 Of The Act, All Dated 30.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. 2

For Appellant: Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 80I

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.193/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/s Rawats-Balaji(JV), Vs Pr.CIT, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(RS), Dist : Jharsuguda PAN No. : AABAR 9061 J TAN No. : BBNR01647 C AND आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.194/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/s SBEPL-GRIL(JV), Vs Pr.CIT, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(RS), Dist : Jharsuguda PAN No. : AAFAS 2639 R TAN No. : BBNS04348 B AND आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.195/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Asse…

M/S- Sbep-Gril(Joint Venture), Jharsuguda vs. Principal CIT, Sambalpur

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 194/CTK/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.193/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Rawats-Balaji(Jv), Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aabar 9061 J Tan No. : Bbnr01647 C & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.194/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Sbepl-Gril(Jv), Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aafas 2639 R Tan No. : Bbns04348 B & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.195/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Shree Balaji Engicons Pvt Ltd Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aagcs 4292 P Tan No. : Bbns00091 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, Ar िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Citdr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 26/10/2021 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23/12/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Three Appeals Have Been Filed By Three Different Assessees Against The Order Passed By The Pr.Cit, Sambalpur, U/S.263 Of The Act, All Dated 30.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. 2

For Appellant: Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 80I

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.193/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/s Rawats-Balaji(JV), Vs Pr.CIT, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(RS), Dist : Jharsuguda PAN No. : AABAR 9061 J TAN No. : BBNR01647 C AND आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.194/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/s SBEPL-GRIL(JV), Vs Pr.CIT, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(RS), Dist : Jharsuguda PAN No. : AAFAS 2639 R TAN No. : BBNS04348 B AND आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.195/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Asse…

M/S- Rawat Balaji (Joint Venture), Jharsuguda vs. Prilncipal, CIT, Sambalpur

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 193/CTK/2019[204-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.193/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Rawats-Balaji(Jv), Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aabar 9061 J Tan No. : Bbnr01647 C & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.194/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Sbepl-Gril(Jv), Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aafas 2639 R Tan No. : Bbns04348 B & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.195/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Shree Balaji Engicons Pvt Ltd Vs Pr.Cit, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(Rs), Dist : Jharsuguda Pan No. : Aagcs 4292 P Tan No. : Bbns00091 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, Ar िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Citdr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 26/10/2021 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23/12/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Three Appeals Have Been Filed By Three Different Assessees Against The Order Passed By The Pr.Cit, Sambalpur, U/S.263 Of The Act, All Dated 30.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. 2

For Appellant: Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 80I

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ, कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.193/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/s Rawats-Balaji(JV), Vs Pr.CIT, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(RS), Dist : Jharsuguda PAN No. : AABAR 9061 J TAN No. : BBNR01647 C AND आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.194/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/s SBEPL-GRIL(JV), Vs Pr.CIT, Sambalpur At/Po-Belpahar(RS), Dist : Jharsuguda PAN No. : AAFAS 2639 R TAN No. : BBNS04348 B AND आयकर अपीऱ सं./ITA Nos.195/CTK/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Asse…

Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, New Delhi vs. Pr. CIT, Ghaziabad

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are

ITA 940/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Dec 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Akhilesh Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘F’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER and DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.939/Del./2021 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015-16) ITA No.940/Del./2021 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2016-17) Shri Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, vs. Pr. CIT, C/o Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Ghaziabad. 206 – 207, Ansal Satyam, RDC, Ghaziabad – 201 002. (PAN : ABFPK9611B) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Shri R.K. Govil, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri T. Kipgen, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 03.12.2021 Date of Order : 13.12.2021 O R D E R PER AMIT SHU…

Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, New Delhi vs. Pr. CIT, Ghaziabad

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are

ITA 939/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Akhilesh Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘F’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER and DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.939/Del./2021 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015-16) ITA No.940/Del./2021 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2016-17) Shri Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, vs. Pr. CIT, C/o Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Ghaziabad. 206 – 207, Ansal Satyam, RDC, Ghaziabad – 201 002. (PAN : ABFPK9611B) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Shri R.K. Govil, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri T. Kipgen, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 03.12.2021 Date of Order : 13.12.2021 O R D E R PER AMIT SHU…

Sanaa Ashiqali Raval, Mumbaui vs. Rp. CIT - 19, Mumbai

ITA 318/MUM/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansanaa Ashiqali Raval, Flat No.42, 2Nd Floor, Ajay Apartment, 25, Dr. G. Deshmukh Marg, Peddar Road, Mumbai-400026 Pan: Aihpr7427D ............ Appellant Vs. Pr. Cit-19 Matru Mandir, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 ............ Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Hero Rai, ARFor Respondent: Sh. Amrish Bedio, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

…ed by the AO would not become erroneous merely because the AO has accepted the 5 ITA No. 318 Mum 2021- Sanaa Ashiqali Raval version of the assessee and found it to be plausible. For the above said purposes, the ld. AR relied upon the following decisions: 1. 395 ITR 1 (SC) CIT v Kwality Steel Suppliers Complex 2. 295 ITR 282 (SC) CIT v Max India Ltd. 3. 203 ITR 108 (Bom) CIT v Gabriel India Ltd. 4. 305 CTR 486 (Bom) CIT v Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd. 5. 387 ITR 691 (Bom) CIT v Gera Development P Ltd. 6. 372 ITR 303 (Bom) CIT v Fine Jewellery India Ltd. 7. 301 ITR 407 (Bom) Idea Cellular Ltd. v DCIT 8. 323 I…

Vikas Oil Products, Dausa vs. PCIT-1, Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 28/JPR/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.CIT-DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 26/JP/2021 Assessment Year: 2011-12 JR Industries, cuke P.C.I.T-1 Vs. H-36-37-38, RIICO Industrial Area, Jaipur. Dausa, (Rajasthan) PAN No.: AAEFJ 4186 G vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 27/JP/2021 Assessment Year: 2011-12 OM Industries, cuke P.C.I.T-1 Vs. E-6A, Dausa, RIICO Industrial Area, Jaipur. Agra Road, Dausa, (Rajas…

Om Industries, Dausa vs. PCIT-1, Jaipur, Jiapur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 27/JPR/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.CIT-DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 26/JP/2021 Assessment Year: 2011-12 JR Industries, cuke P.C.I.T-1 Vs. H-36-37-38, RIICO Industrial Area, Jaipur. Dausa, (Rajasthan) PAN No.: AAEFJ 4186 G vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 27/JP/2021 Assessment Year: 2011-12 OM Industries, cuke P.C.I.T-1 Vs. E-6A, Dausa, RIICO Industrial Area, Jaipur. Agra Road, Dausa, (Rajas…

Jr Industries, Dausa vs. PCIT-1, Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 26/JPR/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.CIT-DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 26/JP/2021 Assessment Year: 2011-12 JR Industries, cuke P.C.I.T-1 Vs. H-36-37-38, RIICO Industrial Area, Jaipur. Dausa, (Rajasthan) PAN No.: AAEFJ 4186 G vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 27/JP/2021 Assessment Year: 2011-12 OM Industries, cuke P.C.I.T-1 Vs. E-6A, Dausa, RIICO Industrial Area, Jaipur. Agra Road, Dausa, (Rajas…

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Hisar vs. CIT, Hisar

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1462/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Nov 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. Najmi, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 263(2)Section 80

…llowing decisions: • Malabar Industries Co. Ltd. vs. CIT 243 ITR 83 (SC)- Pg. 58- 62 CLC CIT vs. Max India Limited: 268 ITR 128 (P&H) [affirmed in 295 ITR 282 (SC)] Hari Iron Trading Co. vs. CIT: 263 ITR 437 (P&H) • CIT v. Kwality Steel Suppliers Complex: 395 ITR 1(SC) • Vimgi Investment (P) Limited 290 ITR 505 (Del) • CIT vs. Gabriel India Limited: 203 ITR 108 (Bom)- • In the light of the aforesaid settled legal position, re- assessment order, is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. 15 ITA No.1462.Del.2016 Jindal Steel & Power Limited A mere suspicion/ statement that the as…

M/S Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd., Jaipur vs. PCIT, Jaipur-2, Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 23/JPR/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur09 Nov 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. B. K. Gupta (Pr.CIT)
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

…w that where two views are possible and the AO has taken one view, assessment order cannot be treated as erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. For this reliance is placed on the following cases:- • CIT Vs. Kwality Steel Suppliers Complex (2017) 395 ITR 1 (SC) • CIT Vs. Max India 295 ITR 282 (SC) • Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. Vs. CIT 243 ITR 83 (SC) 9. It was further submitted that the issue as to whether the PCIT u/s 263 can held the order of AO erroneous where he has allowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest received on investment 6 M/s Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Feder…