Mumbai Metroplitan Region Development Authority, Mumbai vs. DIT (E), Mumbai
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 3690/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Apr 2017AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm Mumbai Metropolitan Vs. Director Of Income Tax Region Development (Exemptions), Mumbai Authority, Plot No. C-14 & 15, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400 051 Pan/Gir No. Aaatm7106R Appellant) .. Respondent)
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 263
…o an addition in respect of a new source of income. In CIT v. Nirbheram Daluram,224 ITR 610 (SC), the Apex Court relied upon the three judges Bench decisions in the cases of Jute Corporation of India v . CIT, 187 ITR 688 (SC) and CIT v. Kanpur Coal Syndicate, 53 ITR 229 (SC) to hold that the CIT(A) (or AAC as in that case) has plenary powers in disposing of an appeal. The scope of his power is coterminous with that of the Assessing Officer. He can do what the Income-tax Officer can do and can also direct him to do what he has failed to do. 18.2 The ratio of the decision in the case of Nirbheram Daluram should pre…