CIT v. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd.

361 ITR 220High Court2014#233 most cited

What is CIT v. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. authority for?

When making an addition under section 68, the creditworthiness or financial strength of an investor contributing share capital or share application money can be proved by producing their bank statements showing sufficient balance for the investment. The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP against this decision.

328

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2013 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. · Section 68 · creditworthiness of creditor · share application money · share capital · bank statement as proof · financial strength of investor · unexplained cash credit · addition under section 68

Also reported as

248 CTR 3319 Taxmann.com 2668 DTR 38

Sections most often in play

Section 147Section 68Section 143(3)Section 148Section 131Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

Issues it is cited on

share capital and share premiumsource of sourcepaper companycreditworthiness of the creditorsection 31live linksection 251(2)share application moneyaddition u/s 68section 251(1)(a)entry operatoradmission of additional evidence

Judgments citing CIT v. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd.

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Superstar Agency Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5832/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Sur Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S Stylish Construction Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Sukhna Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Sukhna Steel Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5741/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Sunlight Tour and Travels Pvt. Ltd., Sahibabad

ITA 5740/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Sintex Consumers Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Delhi

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.4691/DEL/2016 Assessment Year 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd., Ward-2(4), 58, 1st Floor, Jaipuria New Delhi. Enclave, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAHCA6602J (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.As. No.5974/DEL/2017 & 6401/DEL/2017 Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, v. M/s. Delight Resorts Pvt. Ward-7(1), Ltd., New Delhi. F-1-200/13, Sector-3A, Vaishali, Ghaziabad. TAN/PAN: AAACE0061C (Appellant) (Respondent) I…

Chetan Rajnikant Shah, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer-24(1)(4), Mumbai

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1948/MUM/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Feb 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ravish Soodchetan Rajnikant Shah Income Tax Officer-24(1)-4, 703, Jamuna Vihar, Piramal Chambers, Parel, Vs. Juhu Lane, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400 012 Mumbai – 400058 Pan – Amqps6037D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Shreekala Pardeshi, D.R
Section 131Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings in the absence of anything to show that the A.O had independently applied his mind to arrive at a belief that income has escaped assessment. Also in the case of CIT Vs. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. & Ors. (2014) 361 ITR 220 (Del), it was observed by the High Court that where the A.O had acted mechanically on the information supplied by the Directorate of IT(Inv.) about the alleged bogus/ accommodation entries provided by certain individuals/companies without applying his own mind, he was not justified in invoking jurisdiction under Sec. 147. 9. As observed by us at…

Trn Impex Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 7991/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ved Prakash Mishra, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 68

…rts the explanation of assessee that genuine investment have been made in the assessee company. We rely upon Judgments of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the cases of CIT vs. Fair Investment Ltd., 357 ITR 146 (Del.); CIT vs. Kamdhenu Steel and Alloys Ltd., & Ors. 361 ITR 220 (Del.); CIT vs. (i) Dwarakadhish Investment P. Ltd., (2011) 330 ITR 298 (Del.); CIT vs. Winstral Petrochemicals P. Ltd., 330 ITR 603 (Del.); CIT vs. Value Capital Services Pvt. Ltd., (2008) 307 ITR 334 (Del.) and CIT vs., Kureli Papers Mills P. Ltd., 380 ITR 571 (Del.). 10 ITA.No.7991/Del./2019 TRN Impex Pvt. Ltd., Delhi. 6.1. Considering the to…

Madhu Apartment Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 3870/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Feb 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Suresh K. Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Prakash Dubey , Sr. DR
Section 147Section 151Section 68

…s and approval is also given on incorrect facts. The initiation and approval on the basis of wrong facts is not legally valid. He has relied upon Judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs., Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd., 248 CTR 33 and other decisions as was relied upon before the authorities below. The amount received from 30 companies is Rs.8.13 crores only out of total amount of Rs.11.05 crores. Therefore, there is no other material on record to justify the addition. He has submitted that A.O. cannot ask to explain source of the source. Learned Counsel for the Assessee, t…

Madhu Apartment Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 3869/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Feb 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Suresh K. Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Prakash Dubey , Sr. DR
Section 147Section 151Section 68

…s and approval is also given on incorrect facts. The initiation and approval on the basis of wrong facts is not legally valid. He has relied upon Judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs., Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd., 248 CTR 33 and other decisions as was relied upon before the authorities below. The amount received from 30 companies is Rs.8.13 crores only out of total amount of Rs.11.05 crores. Therefore, there is no other material on record to justify the addition. He has submitted that A.O. cannot ask to explain source of the source. Learned Counsel for the Assessee, t…

Shri Sunder Das Sonkia, Jaipur vs. ITO, Ward 1(2), Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed partly and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1383/JPR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Jan 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 1383/Jp/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Sunder Das Sonkia, Cuke I.T.O., Vs. Sonkia Bhawan, Sms, Highway, Ward-1(2), Jaipur. Jaipur. Pan No.: Akhps 7413 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 09/Jp/2020 Assessment Year: 2010-11 I.T.O., Cuke Shri Sunder Das Sonkhiya, Vs. Ward-1(2), Prop.- M/S Naveen Jewellers, Jaipur. Sonkhiya Bhawan, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur. Pan No.: Akhps 7413 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri S.R. Sharma (Ca) & Shri Rajnikant Bhatra (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Smt. Rooni Paul (Addl.Cit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 02/12/2020 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 18/01/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeal Filed By The Assessee & The Cross Appeal Filed By The Revenue Arise Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-4, Jaipur Dated 08/11/2019 For The A.Y. 2010-11. The Grounds Taken By The Assessee & The Revenue Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Smt. Rooni Paul (Addl.CIT)
Section 132Section 143Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148

…46 (Del.) (Trib.) decision dt. 22.04.2016. 3. M/s Surbhi Minchem Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO order dt. 16.05.2014 in ITA No. 102 & 103/Jodh/2014. 4. Vinayak Shyam Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO order dt. 21.05.2014 in 5. CIT Vs. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. &Ors. (2012) 68 DTR 38 (Del.) (HC) He further submitted that where the AO acted mechanically on the information supplied by the Directorate of the IT (Inv.)about the alleged bogus/accommodation entries provided by certain individuals/companies, without applying his own mind, he was not justified in invoking jurisdiction u/s 147. Hence, the reopening of assessment only at…

The ACIT (Central), Ujjain vs. M/S. Vyanktesh Plastics & Packaging (P) Ltd., Ujjain

ITA 737/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Jan 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon'Ble & Hon'Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Ariba Foods Pvt. Acit (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold Star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aalca7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vyanktesh Plastics Acit (Central), Vs. & Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aaacv6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, HON'BLE PRESIDENT AND HON'BLE MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VIRTUAL HEARING Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. Ariba Foods Pvt. ACIT (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) PAN No.AALCA7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Vyanktesh Plastics ACIT (Central), Vs. and Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) PAN No.AAACV6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/s. Famous…

ACIT (Central), Ujjain vs. M/S. Ariba Foods (P) Ltd., Indore

ITA 736/IND/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Jan 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon'Ble & Hon'Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Ariba Foods Pvt. Acit (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold Star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aalca7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vyanktesh Plastics Acit (Central), Vs. & Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aaacv6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, HON'BLE PRESIDENT AND HON'BLE MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VIRTUAL HEARING Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. Ariba Foods Pvt. ACIT (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) PAN No.AALCA7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Vyanktesh Plastics ACIT (Central), Vs. and Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) PAN No.AAACV6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/s. Famous…

The ACIT (Central), Ujjain vs. M/S. Famous Vanijya (P) Ltd., Ujjain

ITA 773/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Jan 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon'Ble & Hon'Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Ariba Foods Pvt. Acit (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold Star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aalca7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vyanktesh Plastics Acit (Central), Vs. & Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aaacv6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, HON'BLE PRESIDENT AND HON'BLE MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VIRTUAL HEARING Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. Ariba Foods Pvt. ACIT (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) PAN No.AALCA7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Vyanktesh Plastics ACIT (Central), Vs. and Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) PAN No.AAACV6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/s. Famous…

Maheshwari Roller Flour Mills Pvt Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward - 16(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 4257/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Shri Raj Kumar, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Prakash Duby, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 150(1)Section 150(2)Section 2Section 68Section 69C

…s and approval is also given on incorrect facts. The initiation and approval on the basis of wrong facts is not legally valid. He has relied upon Judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs., Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd., 248 CTR 33 and other decisions as was relied upon before the authorities below. The amount received from 30 companies is Rs.8.13 crores only out of total amount of Rs.11.05 crores. Therefore, there is no other material on record to justify the addition. He has submitted that A.O. cannot ask to explain source of the source. Learned Counsel for the Assessee, t…

Hindon Forege Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad vs. DCIT, Circle- 1, Ghaziabad

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 3800/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Anil Chaturvedi

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 68

…transactions executed between the creditors and the sub-creditors nor is it the burden of the assessee to prove the creditworthiness of the sub-creditor.” 7.6. Decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kamdhenu Steel and Alloys Ltd., & Ors. 361 ITR 220 (Del.) in which it was held as under : “Once adequate evidence/material is given, which would prima facie discharge the burden of the assessee in proving the identity of shareholders, genuineness of the transaction and creditworthiness of the shareholders, thereafter in case such evidence is to be discarded or it is proved that it has “created”…

ACIT, Central Circle-15, New Delhi vs. Sunstar Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, all the Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 816/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Nov 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 154

…easing & Finance Ltd xiv) 330 ITR 298 (Del) CIT vs. Dwarkadhish Investment (P.) Ltd. xv) 333 ITR 119 (Del) CIT vs. Oasis Hospitalities (P) Ltd. xvi) 354 ITR 282 (Del) MOD Creations (P) Ltd. vs. ITO xvii) 3 61 ITR 147 (Del) CIT v. Expo Global India Ltd. xviii) 361 ITR 220 (Del) CIT v. Kamdhenu Steel and Alloys Ltd affirmed by Apex Court in SLP No. 15640 of 2012 dated 23.12.2011 xix) 366 ITR 110 (Del) CIT vs. Empire Buildtech (P) Ltd. xx) 380 ITR 289 (Del) CIT v. Five Vision Promoters (P.) Ltd. CO Nos.73 to 76, 86 & 87, 79 to 82, 88, 90, 71, 72 & 70, 84 &85/Del/2018 xxi) ITA No. 71/2019 (Del) Pr. CIT vs. Priyatam P…