CIT v. Kabul Chawla

380 ITR 573High Court2016#3 most cited

What is CIT v. Kabul Chawla authority for?

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

3,235

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Kabul Chawla · Kabul Chawla · section 153A · section 132 · incriminating material · search assessment · non-abated years · scope of assessment · additions · undisclosed income

Also reported as

61 Taxmann.com 412234 Taxmann 300281 CTR 45

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Kabul Chawla

Dinesh Kumar, Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle-07, Delhi

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3313/DEL/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Nov 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.3311 To 3313/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2010-11) Dinesh Kumar, Dcit, 407, Nilgiri Apartments, Central Circle-07, Alaknanda, New Delhi-110019. Vs. New Delhi. Pan-Aiopg3637K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Nirbhay Mehta, Adv. Department By Shri Mahesh Kumar, Cit- Dr Date Of Hearing 15.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 26.11.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: All These Three Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Three Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi [Cit(A) In Short] All Are Dated 20.03.2025 For Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively.

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254Section 263Section 68

…Bench of the ITAT vide its order dated 27.09.2022 in ITA No.8923/Del/2019 had remanded back the matter to the file of the AO with a direction to decide the issue in terms of the order of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla reported in 380 ITR 173 (Del.) wherein it is held that no addition u/s 153A could be made in absence of incriminating material. Thereafter, the AO passed the impugned order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 dated 23.03.2024 wherein the AO has again made the addition u/s 68 of the Act of Rs.18,28,660/- by holding that entries in the suspense account are not satisfactory explained by…

Dinesh Kumar, Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circel-07, Delhi

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3312/DEL/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.3311 To 3313/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2010-11) Dinesh Kumar, Dcit, 407, Nilgiri Apartments, Central Circle-07, Alaknanda, New Delhi-110019. Vs. New Delhi. Pan-Aiopg3637K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Nirbhay Mehta, Adv. Department By Shri Mahesh Kumar, Cit- Dr Date Of Hearing 15.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 26.11.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: All These Three Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Three Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi [Cit(A) In Short] All Are Dated 20.03.2025 For Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively.

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254Section 263Section 68

…Bench of the ITAT vide its order dated 27.09.2022 in ITA No.8923/Del/2019 had remanded back the matter to the file of the AO with a direction to decide the issue in terms of the order of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla reported in 380 ITR 173 (Del.) wherein it is held that no addition u/s 153A could be made in absence of incriminating material. Thereafter, the AO passed the impugned order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 dated 23.03.2024 wherein the AO has again made the addition u/s 68 of the Act of Rs.18,28,660/- by holding that entries in the suspense account are not satisfactory explained by…

Dinesh Kumar, Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle-07, Delhi

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3311/DEL/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Nov 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.3311 To 3313/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2008-09 To 2010-11) Dinesh Kumar, Dcit, 407, Nilgiri Apartments, Central Circle-07, Alaknanda, New Delhi-110019. Vs. New Delhi. Pan-Aiopg3637K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Nirbhay Mehta, Adv. Department By Shri Mahesh Kumar, Cit- Dr Date Of Hearing 15.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 26.11.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: All These Three Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Three Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi [Cit(A) In Short] All Are Dated 20.03.2025 For Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively.

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254Section 263Section 68

…Bench of the ITAT vide its order dated 27.09.2022 in ITA No.8923/Del/2019 had remanded back the matter to the file of the AO with a direction to decide the issue in terms of the order of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla reported in 380 ITR 173 (Del.) wherein it is held that no addition u/s 153A could be made in absence of incriminating material. Thereafter, the AO passed the impugned order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 dated 23.03.2024 wherein the AO has again made the addition u/s 68 of the Act of Rs.18,28,660/- by holding that entries in the suspense account are not satisfactory explained by…