CIT v. Kabul Chawla

380 ITR 573High Court2016#3 most cited

What is CIT v. Kabul Chawla authority for?

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

3,235

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,514 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Kabul Chawla · Kabul Chawla · section 153A · section 132 · incriminating material · search assessment · non-abated years · scope of assessment · additions · undisclosed income

Also reported as

61 Taxmann.com 412234 Taxmann 300281 CTR 45

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Kabul Chawla

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S Subash Dabas, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the cross objection filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2398/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2008-09 Acit, Vs Subhash Dabas, Central Circle-18, Prop. Tirupati Construction Co., New Delhi. C/O Tirupati Bldgs. & Offices Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.3, Dwarka City Centre, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi. Pan: Aagpd6947F Co No.221/Del/2016 (Ita No.2398/Del/2016) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Subhash Dabas, Vs. Acit, Prop. Tirupati Construction Co., Central Circle-18, C/O Tirupati Bldgs. & New Delhi,. Offices Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.3, Dwarka City Centre, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi. Pan: Aagpd6947F (Appellant/Cross Objector) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Mahavir Singh, Advocate Revenue By : Ms Nidhi Srivastava, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 02.09.2019 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: The Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 22Nd February, 2016 Of The Cit(A)-27, New Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2008-09. Co No.221/Del/2016 The Assessee Has Also Filed Cross Objections Against The Appeal Filed By The Revenue. For The Sake Of Convenience, These Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms Nidhi Srivastava, CIT, DR
Section 127Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 2(22)(e)Section 68

…e of search and no addition has been made in the assessment order on the basis of any incriminating material found during the course of search. Therefore, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla, reported in 380 ITR 573, no addition could have been made for the impugned assessment year. Referring to the decision of the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case vide ITA No.2330/Del/2016 and CO No.223/Del/2016, order dated 30th July,2019 for assessment year 2007-08, he submitted that under identical circumstances the appeal filed by the Revenue was d…