CIT v. K. Bhuvanendran

303 ITR 235High Court2008#2864 most cited

What is CIT v. K. Bhuvanendran authority for?

An assessment or addition to income cannot be made solely based on a retracted statement, especially when it is not corroborated by seized material or other concrete evidence. The revenue must produce evidence to establish claims like understatement of sale consideration or 'on-money'.

41

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,418 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. K. Bhuvanendran · 303 ITR 235 · Section 143(2) · Section 143(3) · Section 147 · Section 148 · retracted statement · assessment without evidence · corroborative evidence · seized material · on-money · understatement of sale consideration

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. K. Bhuvanendran