CIT v. Indo American Jewellery Ltd.

44 Taxmann.com 310High Court2014#2829 most cited

What is CIT v. Indo American Jewellery Ltd. authority for?

A transfer pricing adjustment for notional interest on delayed receivables from an Associated Enterprise (AE) may not be warranted if the assessee consistently does not charge interest from both AEs and non-AEs.

42

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Indo American Jewellery Ltd. · Section 92B · Section 92CA(3) · transfer pricing · interest on outstanding receivables · delayed receivables · associated enterprise · non-associated enterprise · consistent policy · notional interest adjustment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Indo American Jewellery Ltd.

S. Vinodkumar Diamonds P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 5(3)(2), Mumbai

The appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 968/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.968/Mum/2016 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2011-12) M/S. S. Vinodkumar Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. Acit-Circle-5(3)(2) Office No.Bw-3010 Mumbai. बनाम/ Bharat Diamond Bourse Vs. Bandra (East) Mumbai-400 051. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaics-5514-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Appellant By : Shri Madhur Aggarwal- Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Rajneesh Yadav - Ld.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 16/09/2019 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 03/10/2019 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Aggarwal- Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajneesh Yadav - Ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

…1 M/s. S. Vinodkumar Diamonds Pvt.Ltd. आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “जे” "ायपीठ मुंबई म"। Assessment Year :2011-12 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “J” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, "ाियक सद" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.968/Mum/2016 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2011-12) M/s. S. Vinodkumar Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. ACIT-Circle-5(3)(2) Office No.BW-3010 Mumbai. बनाम/ Bharat Diamond Bourse Vs. Bandra (East) Mumbai-400 051. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAICS-5514-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"…

ITO 8(1)(3), Mumbai vs. Dania Oro Jewellery P. Ltd, Mumbai

ITA 802/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri N. K. Pradhan, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.802/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) बनाम/ The Income Tax Officer Dania Oro Jewellery Pvt. 8(1)(3) Ltd. Vs. Room No.206, 2Nd Floor, Gala No.601 & 602, Aayakar Bhavan, Block No.1, Seepz-Sez, Mumbai - 400020 Seepz++, Andheri (East) Mumbai - 400096 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccd3214E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Smt. Arati VissanjiFor Respondent: Shri N. K. Chand
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,“के” "यायपीठ, मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K” BENCH, MUMBAI "ी शि"तिजत डे, "या"यक सद"य, एवं "ी एन के "धान, लेखा सद"य, के सम" BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM AND SHRI N. K. PRADHAN, AM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.802/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) बनाम/ The Income Tax Officer Dania Oro Jewellery Pvt. 8(1)(3) Ltd. Vs. Room No.206, 2nd Floor, Gala No.601 and 602, Aayakar Bhavan, Block No.1, SEEPZ-SEZ, Mumbai - 400020 SEEPZ++, Andheri (East) Mumbai - 400096 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AACCD3214E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. Assessee by: Smt.…