M/S Karnataka Fransalian Society, Bangalore vs. DDIT, Bangalore
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 972/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Nov 2015AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri. Abraham P. George & Shri. Vijaypal Raoi.T.A No.972/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2011-12) M/S. Karnataka Fransalian Society, “Vinayalaya”, P. B. No.5557, Malleswaram West, Bangalore 560 084 .. Appellant Pan : Aaatk1206E V. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Circle -17(2), Bangalore .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Suresh Muthukrishnan, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Sunil Kumar Agarwala, Jcit Heard On : 16.11.2015 Pronounced On : 18.11.2015 O R D E R Per Abraham P. George:
For Appellant: Shri. Suresh Muthukrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sunil Kumar Agarwala, JCIT
Section 10(23)(c)Section 11Section 12ASection 154Section 28
…2, 13 and Sec.10(23)(c) of the Act. He denied the claim for carry forward. 03. Assessee’s appeal before the CIT (A) did not meet with any success. CIT (A) relying on the judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Indian National Theatre Trust [(2008) 305 ITR 149], held that claim of the assessee could not be allowed. As per the CIT (A), deficit arose on account of excess application for charitable purpose and such excess could not be treated on par with total income / loss. He confirmed the order of AO. 04. Now before us, Ld. AR strongly assailing the order of lower authorities submitted that coordinate…