CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja

302 ITR 63High Court2008#686 most cited

What is CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja authority for?

When unaccounted receipts or suppressed sales are detected and books of account are rejected under Section 145(3), additions to income must be restricted to the profit element embedded in such transactions, not the entire transaction value. This profit element is to be estimated by considering the assessee's regular profit ratio as per books of account.

147

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja · Section 145(3) · unaccounted receipts · on-money · suppressed sales · rejection of books of account · profit estimation · profit element · undisclosed business income · best judgment assessment · loose papers · Section 132

Also reported as

171 Taxmann 406215 CTR 509

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 132Section 145(3)Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

on money receiptsection 256(1)project completion methodsection 145(2)section 256on-moneysection 199loose papersrejection of books of accountspecified authorityicdsreasoned order

Judgments citing CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja

Yugaandhar Housing Pvt Ltd, Vijayawada vs. ACIT, Central Cercle, Vijayawada

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 86/VIZ/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Aug 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri MV Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

…itself cannot represent the income of the assessee. It is the realization of excess over the 12 cost incurred that only forms part of the profit included in the configuration of sale. Similar view was taken in the case of CIT vs. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja [215 CTR 509] (Gujarat HC) and CIT vs. Sharada Real Estate (P) Ltd., [99 DTR 100] (MP-HC) and in the case of Jyotibhaichand Bhaichand Saraf & Sons (P) Ltd., vs. DCIT [139 ITD 10] the Coordinate Bench at Pune has confirmed the addition could only be made only to an extent of gross profit earned on an unaccounted/suppressed sales and not on the entire sales its…

Yugaandhar Housing Pvt Ltd, Vijayawada vs. ACIT, Central Cercle, Vijayawada

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 85/VIZ/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Aug 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri MV Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

…itself cannot represent the income of the assessee. It is the realization of excess over the 12 cost incurred that only forms part of the profit included in the configuration of sale. Similar view was taken in the case of CIT vs. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja [215 CTR 509] (Gujarat HC) and CIT vs. Sharada Real Estate (P) Ltd., [99 DTR 100] (MP-HC) and in the case of Jyotibhaichand Bhaichand Saraf & Sons (P) Ltd., vs. DCIT [139 ITD 10] the Coordinate Bench at Pune has confirmed the addition could only be made only to an extent of gross profit earned on an unaccounted/suppressed sales and not on the entire sales its…

Yugaandhar Housing Pvt Ltd, Vijayawada vs. ACIT, Central Cercle, Vijayawada

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 84/VIZ/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Aug 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri MV Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

…itself cannot represent the income of the assessee. It is the realization of excess over the 12 cost incurred that only forms part of the profit included in the configuration of sale. Similar view was taken in the case of CIT vs. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja [215 CTR 509] (Gujarat HC) and CIT vs. Sharada Real Estate (P) Ltd., [99 DTR 100] (MP-HC) and in the case of Jyotibhaichand Bhaichand Saraf & Sons (P) Ltd., vs. DCIT [139 ITD 10] the Coordinate Bench at Pune has confirmed the addition could only be made only to an extent of gross profit earned on an unaccounted/suppressed sales and not on the entire sales its…

Yugaandhar Housing Pvt Ltd, Vijayawada vs. ACIT, Central Cercle, Vijayawada

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 83/VIZ/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Aug 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri MV Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

…itself cannot represent the income of the assessee. It is the realization of excess over the 12 cost incurred that only forms part of the profit included in the configuration of sale. Similar view was taken in the case of CIT vs. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja [215 CTR 509] (Gujarat HC) and CIT vs. Sharada Real Estate (P) Ltd., [99 DTR 100] (MP-HC) and in the case of Jyotibhaichand Bhaichand Saraf & Sons (P) Ltd., vs. DCIT [139 ITD 10] the Coordinate Bench at Pune has confirmed the addition could only be made only to an extent of gross profit earned on an unaccounted/suppressed sales and not on the entire sales its…

Damodar Reddy Kaiti, Hyderabad vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1631/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Sri K.A. Sai Prasad, C.AFor Respondent: Sri K.P.R. Murthy
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 44A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member ITA Nos.1630 & 1631/Hyd/2018 Assessment Years: 2013-14 and 2014-15 Damodar Reddy Kaiti, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner R/o.Hyderabad. of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(3), PAN : AEHPK0424M. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri K.A. Sai Prasad, C.A. Revenue by: Sri K.P.R. Murthy. Date of hearing: 13.07.2022 Date of pronouncement: 18.07.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. These are the two connected appeals filed by the assessee feeling ag…

Damodar Reddy Kaiti, Hyderabad vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1630/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Sri K.A. Sai Prasad, C.AFor Respondent: Sri K.P.R. Murthy
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 44A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member ITA Nos.1630 & 1631/Hyd/2018 Assessment Years: 2013-14 and 2014-15 Damodar Reddy Kaiti, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner R/o.Hyderabad. of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(3), PAN : AEHPK0424M. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri K.A. Sai Prasad, C.A. Revenue by: Sri K.P.R. Murthy. Date of hearing: 13.07.2022 Date of pronouncement: 18.07.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. These are the two connected appeals filed by the assessee feeling ag…

ACIT, Central Circle, Alwar vs. Shri Babu Lal Data, 2015-16

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1232/JPR/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: S. Naiyer Ali Najmi, CIT
Section 127Section 132Section 139Section 153A

…es can't be added to the total income as there was no material on record that assessee made investment to make unaccounted sales. Gross profit rate should be applied to the unaccounted sales. This decision is approved by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court reported in 302 ITR 63 where at Para 6 it was held as under: "6. Hence, in the absence of any material on record to show that there was any unexplained investment made by the assessee which was reflected by the alleged unaccounted sales the finding of the Tribunal that only the gross profit on the said amount can be brought to tax does not call for any interference. Th…

ACIT, Central Circle, Alwar vs. Shri Babu Lal Data, 2015-16

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1231/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: S. Naiyer Ali Najmi, CIT
Section 127Section 132Section 139Section 153A

…es can't be added to the total income as there was no material on record that assessee made investment to make unaccounted sales. Gross profit rate should be applied to the unaccounted sales. This decision is approved by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court reported in 302 ITR 63 where at Para 6 it was held as under: "6. Hence, in the absence of any material on record to show that there was any unexplained investment made by the assessee which was reflected by the alleged unaccounted sales the finding of the Tribunal that only the gross profit on the said amount can be brought to tax does not call for any interference. Th…

Shri Babu Lal Data, Alwar vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Alwar

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1223/JPR/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: S. Naiyer Ali Najmi, CIT
Section 127Section 132Section 139Section 153A

…es can't be added to the total income as there was no material on record that assessee made investment to make unaccounted sales. Gross profit rate should be applied to the unaccounted sales. This decision is approved by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court reported in 302 ITR 63 where at Para 6 it was held as under: "6. Hence, in the absence of any material on record to show that there was any unexplained investment made by the assessee which was reflected by the alleged unaccounted sales the finding of the Tribunal that only the gross profit on the said amount can be brought to tax does not call for any interference. Th…

Shri Babu Lal Data, Alwar vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Alwar

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1222/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: S. Naiyer Ali Najmi, CIT
Section 127Section 132Section 139Section 153A

…es can't be added to the total income as there was no material on record that assessee made investment to make unaccounted sales. Gross profit rate should be applied to the unaccounted sales. This decision is approved by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court reported in 302 ITR 63 where at Para 6 it was held as under: "6. Hence, in the absence of any material on record to show that there was any unexplained investment made by the assessee which was reflected by the alleged unaccounted sales the finding of the Tribunal that only the gross profit on the said amount can be brought to tax does not call for any interference. Th…

The DCIT, Circle-8, Ahmedabad vs. Sambhav Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 1818/AHD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1818/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Dcit, Cir.4(1)(1) Vs. Sambhav Infrastructure P.Ltd. Ahmedabad. B-12, Amar Aprtment Vasna Barrage Road Vasna, Ahmedabad. Pan : Aakcs 5194 C

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Mohd Usman,CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 143(2)

…large number of decisions have been referred by the ld.CIT(A), and these decisions were cited before the AO also viz. i) Kishor Mohanlal Telwala Vs. ACIT, 64 TTJ (Ahd) 543; ii) Abhishek Corpn Vs. DCIT, 63 TTJ (Ahd 651 iii) CIT Vs. Gurubachhan Singh J Juneja, 302 ITR 63 (Guj) iv) RK Corporation, ITA No.4940/1996 , ITAT, Ahmedabad bench v) CIT Vs. President Industreies, 258 ITR 664 (Guj) vi) CIT Vs. Balchand A Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP) vii) ITO Vs. Sai Krupa Construction (2007) 13 SOT 459 (Mum) viii) CIT Vs. S. Khader Khan Sons (2013) 352 ITR 480 (SC) ix) Pau Mathews & Sons Vs. CIT, (2003) 263 ITR 157 (Mad) x)…

The ACIT, Central Circle-1(1), Ahmedabad vs. Uma Shakti Corporation Residency Project, Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal IT(SS)A 197/Ahd/2013 & 198/Ahd/2013

ITA 1371/AHD/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Nov 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Mahesh S. Chhajed, A.RFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT-D.R
Section 132Section 143(3)

…naccounted receipts / unaccounted sales / on-money receipts cannot be brought to tax in the cases of builders and developers. Only the net profit embedded in the gross unaccounted receipts can be taxed. In the case of CIT vs Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja [2008] 302 ITR 63 (GUJ.) it has been held by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat that :- "In absence of any material on record to show that there was any unexplained investment made by the assessee which was reflected by the alleged unaccounted sales the finding of the Tribunal that only the gross profit on the said amount can be brought to tax does not call for any…

Parthavi Construction Private Limited, Raipur vs. Assistat Commissioner of Incometax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 99/RPR/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 93 To 99/Rpr/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2017-18) M/S. Parthivi Constructions Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Vs. Parthivi Pacific, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-1, Raipur Commercial Complex, Near (C.G.) Axis Bank, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp4406G .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri R. K. Singh, Cit.Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : 09/08/2021 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 26/10/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Singh, CIT.DRFor Respondent: 09/08/2021
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

…eja (1996) 54 TTJ(Ahd) 1(TM). Similarly, it has been held that net profit can be applied on unaccounted sales/receipts for the purposes of making additions in several other decisions viz; CIT vs. S.C. Kothari (1971) 82 ITR 794 (SC); CIT vs. G.S. Juneja (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj); CIT vs. Babulal K. Daga (2016) 387 ITR 114 (Guj); CIT vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP); Anil Kumar Bajaj vs. DCIT in ITA No.4392/Del/2014; Hariram Brambhani Vs. ACIT in ITA No.5067/Mum/2010; Man Mohan Sadani Vs. CIT (2008) 304 ITR 52 etc…. In these decisions, it has been held that only profit can be taxed and not the entire r…

Parthavi Construction Private Limited, Raipur vs. Assistat Commissioner of Incometax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 98/RPR/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 93 To 99/Rpr/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2017-18) M/S. Parthivi Constructions Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Vs. Parthivi Pacific, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-1, Raipur Commercial Complex, Near (C.G.) Axis Bank, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp4406G .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri R. K. Singh, Cit.Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : 09/08/2021 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 26/10/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Singh, CIT.DRFor Respondent: 09/08/2021
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

…eja (1996) 54 TTJ(Ahd) 1(TM). Similarly, it has been held that net profit can be applied on unaccounted sales/receipts for the purposes of making additions in several other decisions viz; CIT vs. S.C. Kothari (1971) 82 ITR 794 (SC); CIT vs. G.S. Juneja (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj); CIT vs. Babulal K. Daga (2016) 387 ITR 114 (Guj); CIT vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP); Anil Kumar Bajaj vs. DCIT in ITA No.4392/Del/2014; Hariram Brambhani Vs. ACIT in ITA No.5067/Mum/2010; Man Mohan Sadani Vs. CIT (2008) 304 ITR 52 etc…. In these decisions, it has been held that only profit can be taxed and not the entire r…

Parthavi Construction Private Limited, Raipur vs. Assistat Commissioner of Incometax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 97/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 93 To 99/Rpr/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2017-18) M/S. Parthivi Constructions Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Vs. Parthivi Pacific, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-1, Raipur Commercial Complex, Near (C.G.) Axis Bank, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp4406G .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri R. K. Singh, Cit.Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : 09/08/2021 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 26/10/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Singh, CIT.DRFor Respondent: 09/08/2021
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

…eja (1996) 54 TTJ(Ahd) 1(TM). Similarly, it has been held that net profit can be applied on unaccounted sales/receipts for the purposes of making additions in several other decisions viz; CIT vs. S.C. Kothari (1971) 82 ITR 794 (SC); CIT vs. G.S. Juneja (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj); CIT vs. Babulal K. Daga (2016) 387 ITR 114 (Guj); CIT vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP); Anil Kumar Bajaj vs. DCIT in ITA No.4392/Del/2014; Hariram Brambhani Vs. ACIT in ITA No.5067/Mum/2010; Man Mohan Sadani Vs. CIT (2008) 304 ITR 52 etc…. In these decisions, it has been held that only profit can be taxed and not the entire r…

Parthavi Construction Private Limited, Raipur vs. Assistat Commissioner of Incometax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 96/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Oct 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 93 To 99/Rpr/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2017-18) M/S. Parthivi Constructions Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Vs. Parthivi Pacific, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-1, Raipur Commercial Complex, Near (C.G.) Axis Bank, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp4406G .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri R. K. Singh, Cit.Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : 09/08/2021 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 26/10/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Singh, CIT.DRFor Respondent: 09/08/2021
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

…eja (1996) 54 TTJ(Ahd) 1(TM). Similarly, it has been held that net profit can be applied on unaccounted sales/receipts for the purposes of making additions in several other decisions viz; CIT vs. S.C. Kothari (1971) 82 ITR 794 (SC); CIT vs. G.S. Juneja (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj); CIT vs. Babulal K. Daga (2016) 387 ITR 114 (Guj); CIT vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP); Anil Kumar Bajaj vs. DCIT in ITA No.4392/Del/2014; Hariram Brambhani Vs. ACIT in ITA No.5067/Mum/2010; Man Mohan Sadani Vs. CIT (2008) 304 ITR 52 etc…. In these decisions, it has been held that only profit can be taxed and not the entire r…

Parthavi Construction Private Limited, Raipur vs. Assistat Commissioner of Incometax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 95/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 93 To 99/Rpr/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2017-18) M/S. Parthivi Constructions Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Vs. Parthivi Pacific, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-1, Raipur Commercial Complex, Near (C.G.) Axis Bank, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp4406G .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri R. K. Singh, Cit.Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : 09/08/2021 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 26/10/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Singh, CIT.DRFor Respondent: 09/08/2021
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

…eja (1996) 54 TTJ(Ahd) 1(TM). Similarly, it has been held that net profit can be applied on unaccounted sales/receipts for the purposes of making additions in several other decisions viz; CIT vs. S.C. Kothari (1971) 82 ITR 794 (SC); CIT vs. G.S. Juneja (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj); CIT vs. Babulal K. Daga (2016) 387 ITR 114 (Guj); CIT vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP); Anil Kumar Bajaj vs. DCIT in ITA No.4392/Del/2014; Hariram Brambhani Vs. ACIT in ITA No.5067/Mum/2010; Man Mohan Sadani Vs. CIT (2008) 304 ITR 52 etc…. In these decisions, it has been held that only profit can be taxed and not the entire r…

Parthavi Construction Private Limited, Raipur vs. Assistat Commissioner of Incometax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 94/RPR/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Oct 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 93 To 99/Rpr/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2017-18) M/S. Parthivi Constructions Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Vs. Parthivi Pacific, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-1, Raipur Commercial Complex, Near (C.G.) Axis Bank, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp4406G .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri R. K. Singh, Cit.Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : 09/08/2021 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 26/10/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Singh, CIT.DRFor Respondent: 09/08/2021
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

…eja (1996) 54 TTJ(Ahd) 1(TM). Similarly, it has been held that net profit can be applied on unaccounted sales/receipts for the purposes of making additions in several other decisions viz; CIT vs. S.C. Kothari (1971) 82 ITR 794 (SC); CIT vs. G.S. Juneja (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj); CIT vs. Babulal K. Daga (2016) 387 ITR 114 (Guj); CIT vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP); Anil Kumar Bajaj vs. DCIT in ITA No.4392/Del/2014; Hariram Brambhani Vs. ACIT in ITA No.5067/Mum/2010; Man Mohan Sadani Vs. CIT (2008) 304 ITR 52 etc…. In these decisions, it has been held that only profit can be taxed and not the entire r…

Parthavi Construction Private Limited, Raipur vs. Assistat Commissioner of Incometax, Central Circle-1, Raipur

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 93/RPR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 93 To 99/Rpr/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2017-18) M/S. Parthivi Constructions Asst. Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Vs. Parthivi Pacific, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-1, Raipur Commercial Complex, Near (C.G.) Axis Bank, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaccp4406G .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri R. K. Singh, Cit.Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : 09/08/2021 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 26/10/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Singh, CIT.DRFor Respondent: 09/08/2021
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

…eja (1996) 54 TTJ(Ahd) 1(TM). Similarly, it has been held that net profit can be applied on unaccounted sales/receipts for the purposes of making additions in several other decisions viz; CIT vs. S.C. Kothari (1971) 82 ITR 794 (SC); CIT vs. G.S. Juneja (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj); CIT vs. Babulal K. Daga (2016) 387 ITR 114 (Guj); CIT vs. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003) 263 ITR 610 (MP); Anil Kumar Bajaj vs. DCIT in ITA No.4392/Del/2014; Hariram Brambhani Vs. ACIT in ITA No.5067/Mum/2010; Man Mohan Sadani Vs. CIT (2008) 304 ITR 52 etc…. In these decisions, it has been held that only profit can be taxed and not the entire r…

Dhani Ram, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-38(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2817/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Oct 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.K. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

…d Counsel for the Assessee submitted that in the case of unaccounted business transaction, only the profit element can be added as income.  CIT v. President Industries, reported in (2002) 258 ITR 654.  CIT v. Gurubachhun Singh J. Juneja, reported in (2008) 302 ITR 63 (Guj.).  CIT v. Samir Synthetics Mill, reported in (2010) 326 ITR 410.  Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in case of CIT v. Sathyanarayn P. Rathi reported in (2013) 38 taxamann.com 402.  Hon’ble High Court in case of CIT vs. Bahul K Daga reported in 79 taxmann.com 337.  Man Mohan Sadani v. CIT reported in (2008) 304 ITR 52. 14 ITA.No.2817/Del./2019 S…