CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa

386 ITR 483High Court2016#176 most cited

What is CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa authority for?

If no incriminating material is found during a search operation regarding a particular issue, then no addition can be made concerning that issue in an assessment under section 153A of the Income-tax Act.

416

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa · Gurinder Singh Bawa · 386 ITR 483 · Section 153A · Section 132 · incriminating material · no addition · search assessment scope · assessment in search cases · undisclosed income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa

Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Mr. Pesi Shroff, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1624/PUN/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Dec 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1624/Pun/2015 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal and Shri Nilesh MoreFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Aggarwal and Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 153ASection 2(13)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण बी बी” "यायपीठ पुणे म" । बी "यायपीठ पुणे म" । "यायपीठ पुणे म" । "यायपीठ पुणे म" । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, PUNE "ी डी डी. क"णाकरा राव क"णाकरा राव, लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य, डी डी "ी "ी "ी क"णाकरा राव क"णाकरा राव लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य एवं "ी िवकास अव"थी, "याियक सद"य के सम" । एवं "ी िवकास अव"थी एवं "ी िवकास अव"थी एवं "ी िवकास अव"थी "याियक सद"य के सम" । "याियक सद"य के सम" । "याियक सद"य के सम" । BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1624/PUN/2015 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं आयकर…