CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa

Kamla Park Developers, Mumbai vs. DCIT (3)(4) Central Circle, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2009-10,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. Nos. 1616 To 1618 & 1620 To 1621/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years:2009-10 To 2011-12, 2013-14 & 2014-15) Kamla Park Developers बनाम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) 19Th Floor, Air India Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400057. Mumbai-400021. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aahfk7627G (अपीलधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोर्णध की तधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 07.01.2019 For A.Y. 2009-10 To 2011-12, 2013-14 & 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

Kamla Landmarc Estate, Mumbai vs. DCIT(3)(4) Central Circle, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2008-09 is allowed and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2012-13 is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. Nos.1608 & 1612/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 & 2012-13) Kamlalandmarc Estate बनाम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk1567A (अपीलधथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Shri Rashmikant Modi Assessee By: Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha(Dr) सुिवधईकीतधरीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोर्णधकीतधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 07-01-2019 For A.Ys. 2008- 09 & Ay. 2012-13. Since Issues Involved Are Common, Both These Appeals For The Two Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose These Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2012-13 KamlaLandmarc Estate “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Sectio…

Kamlashri Builders, Mumbai vs. DCIT -CC- 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Gagan Goyal

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1381/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2009-10) ITA No. 1383/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2011-12) ITA No. 1385/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2013-14) Kamla Shri Builders Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P.M. Road, Vile Parle(East), Mumbai-400057 PAN: AAHFK6270D ...... Appellant Vs. Dy.CIT, CC-3(4), 19th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Respondent : Shri Rashmikant Modi Appellant by : Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Respondent by : Sh. Vinay Sinha, CIT- DR : 15/07/2022 Date of hearing Date of pron…

Kamlashri Builders, Mumbai vs. DCIT -CC- 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Gagan Goyal

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1381/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2009-10) ITA No. 1383/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2011-12) ITA No. 1385/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2013-14) Kamla Shri Builders Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P.M. Road, Vile Parle(East), Mumbai-400057 PAN: AAHFK6270D ...... Appellant Vs. Dy.CIT, CC-3(4), 19th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Respondent : Shri Rashmikant Modi Appellant by : Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Respondent by : Sh. Vinay Sinha, CIT- DR : 15/07/2022 Date of hearing Date of pron…

Kamlashri Builders, Mumbai vs. DCIT -CC- 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Gagan Goyal

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1381/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2009-10) ITA No. 1383/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2011-12) ITA No. 1385/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2013-14) Kamla Shri Builders Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P.M. Road, Vile Parle(East), Mumbai-400057 PAN: AAHFK6270D ...... Appellant Vs. Dy.CIT, CC-3(4), 19th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Respondent : Shri Rashmikant Modi Appellant by : Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Respondent by : Sh. Vinay Sinha, CIT- DR : 15/07/2022 Date of hearing Date of pron…

Kamlashri Builders, Mumbai vs. DCIT -CC- 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Gagan Goyal

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1381/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2009-10) ITA No. 1383/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2011-12) ITA No. 1385/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2013-14) Kamla Shri Builders Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P.M. Road, Vile Parle(East), Mumbai-400057 PAN: AAHFK6270D ...... Appellant Vs. Dy.CIT, CC-3(4), 19th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Respondent : Shri Rashmikant Modi Appellant by : Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Respondent by : Sh. Vinay Sinha, CIT- DR : 15/07/2022 Date of hearing Date of pron…

Kamlashri Builders, Mumbai vs. DCIT -CC- 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Gagan Goyal

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1381/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2009-10) ITA No. 1383/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2011-12) ITA No. 1385/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2013-14) Kamla Shri Builders Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P.M. Road, Vile Parle(East), Mumbai-400057 PAN: AAHFK6270D ...... Appellant Vs. Dy.CIT, CC-3(4), 19th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Respondent : Shri Rashmikant Modi Appellant by : Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Respondent by : Sh. Vinay Sinha, CIT- DR : 15/07/2022 Date of hearing Date of pron…

Kamla Ankur Venture, Mumbai vs. DCIT (3)(4), Central Circle, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. Nos.1280 To 1286/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 To 2014-15) Kamla Ankur Venture बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk4902H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 24.12.2018 For A.Y. 2008-09 To Ay. 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

Kamla Ankur Venture, Mumbai vs. DCIT (3)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. Nos.1280 To 1286/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 To 2014-15) Kamla Ankur Venture बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk4902H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 24.12.2018 For A.Y. 2008-09 To Ay. 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

Kamla Ankur Venture, Mumbai vs. DCIT(3)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. Nos.1280 To 1286/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 To 2014-15) Kamla Ankur Venture बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk4902H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 24.12.2018 For A.Y. 2008-09 To Ay. 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

Kamla Ankur Venture, Mumbai vs. DCIT, Central Cirle-(3)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. Nos.1280 To 1286/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 To 2014-15) Kamla Ankur Venture बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk4902H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 24.12.2018 For A.Y. 2008-09 To Ay. 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

Kamla Ankur Venture, Mumbai vs. DCIT(3)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. Nos.1280 To 1286/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 To 2014-15) Kamla Ankur Venture बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk4902H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 24.12.2018 For A.Y. 2008-09 To Ay. 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

Kamla Ankur Venture, Mumbai vs. DCIT(3)(4), Central Circle, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. Nos.1280 To 1286/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 To 2014-15) Kamla Ankur Venture बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk4902H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 24.12.2018 For A.Y. 2008-09 To Ay. 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

Kamla Ankur, Mumbai vs. DCIT(3)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2008-09,

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/I.T.A. Nos.1280 To 1286/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Years:2008-09 To 2014-15) Kamla Ankur Venture बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-3(4) Ground Floor, Shanti Vimal, P. 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. M. Road, Vile Parle East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400057. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaifk4902H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rashmikant Modi Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke Revenue By: Shri Vinay Sinha (Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/07/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Are Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [Hereinafter In Short “Ld. Cit(A)”] Dated 24.12.2018 For A.Y. 2008-09 To Ay. 2014-15. Since Issues Involved Are Common, All The Appeals For All The Assessment Year/Years (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ay”) Were Heard Together. Both The Parties Also Argued Them Together Raising Similar Arguments On These Issues. Accordingly, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Dispose All The Appeals By This Consolidated Order.

…with the necessary powers to make additions to the total income in relation to assessments which did not abate on account of search. This view finds support from the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs Gurinder Singh Bawa (386 ITR 483) wherein it was held as follows: “3. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, the respondent-assessee had filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.9.61 lakhs. The return of income as filed by the respondent- assessee was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Admittedly, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued. Thereafte…

M/S. Burlington Finance Ltd., Mumbai vs. Dy CIT-CC-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” Bench, Mumbai Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 1039/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1195/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1196/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2014-15) Vs. DCIT, Central M/s. Bazigar Trading Pvt. Ltd. Office No. 20, 8th Floor Circle-3(1) 3 Navjivan Commercial 19th Floor Premises Co-operative Society Air India Building Ltd., lamington Road Nariman Point Mumbai-400 008. Mumbai-400 021. PAN : AABCB3052B (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1266/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1294/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1267/Mum/2021 (A.Y.…

M/S. Burlington Finance Ltd., Mumbai vs. Dy CIT, Central Circle-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” Bench, Mumbai Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 1039/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1195/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1196/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2014-15) Vs. DCIT, Central M/s. Bazigar Trading Pvt. Ltd. Office No. 20, 8th Floor Circle-3(1) 3 Navjivan Commercial 19th Floor Premises Co-operative Society Air India Building Ltd., lamington Road Nariman Point Mumbai-400 008. Mumbai-400 021. PAN : AABCB3052B (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1266/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1294/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1267/Mum/2021 (A.Y.…

M/S. Burlington Finance Ltd., Mumbai vs. Dy CIT, Central Circle-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” Bench, Mumbai Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 1039/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1195/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1196/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2014-15) Vs. DCIT, Central M/s. Bazigar Trading Pvt. Ltd. Office No. 20, 8th Floor Circle-3(1) 3 Navjivan Commercial 19th Floor Premises Co-operative Society Air India Building Ltd., lamington Road Nariman Point Mumbai-400 008. Mumbai-400 021. PAN : AABCB3052B (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1266/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1294/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1267/Mum/2021 (A.Y.…

M/S. Bazigar Trading P. Ltd, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT-CC-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” Bench, Mumbai Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 1039/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1195/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1196/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2014-15) Vs. DCIT, Central M/s. Bazigar Trading Pvt. Ltd. Office No. 20, 8th Floor Circle-3(1) 3 Navjivan Commercial 19th Floor Premises Co-operative Society Air India Building Ltd., lamington Road Nariman Point Mumbai-400 008. Mumbai-400 021. PAN : AABCB3052B (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1266/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1294/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1267/Mum/2021 (A.Y.…

M/S. Bazigar Trading P. Ltd, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT-CC-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” Bench, Mumbai Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 1039/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1195/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1196/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2014-15) Vs. DCIT, Central M/s. Bazigar Trading Pvt. Ltd. Office No. 20, 8th Floor Circle-3(1) 3 Navjivan Commercial 19th Floor Premises Co-operative Society Air India Building Ltd., lamington Road Nariman Point Mumbai-400 008. Mumbai-400 021. PAN : AABCB3052B (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1266/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1294/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1267/Mum/2021 (A.Y.…

M/S. Bazigar Trading P. Ltd., Mumbai vs. Dy CIT-CC-3(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” Bench, Mumbai Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 1039/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1195/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1196/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2014-15) Vs. DCIT, Central M/s. Bazigar Trading Pvt. Ltd. Office No. 20, 8th Floor Circle-3(1) 3 Navjivan Commercial 19th Floor Premises Co-operative Society Air India Building Ltd., lamington Road Nariman Point Mumbai-400 008. Mumbai-400 021. PAN : AABCB3052B (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 1266/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1294/Mum/2021 (A.Y. 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1267/Mum/2021 (A.Y.…