Which sections of the Income Tax Act does CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 1961, Section 43B, Section 115BBE, Section 142(1), Section 143(3), Section 263.

CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn

Q: How many judgments cite CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn?

540 judgments on BharatTax cite CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn (41 Taxmann.com 100), spanning 2015 to 2025.

41 Taxmann.com 100High Court2014#118 most cited

What is CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn authority for?

Employees' contributions to provident fund or other welfare funds are deductible under section 36(1)(va) only if paid by the due date specified in the respective welfare fund enactments, and section 43B does not extend this period to the income tax return filing due date under section 139(1).

540

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn · Section 43B · Section 36(1)(va) · employees contribution to PF · welfare funds due date · allowable deduction · income tax return filing date · Section 2(24)(x) · provident fund payment · EssaeTeraoka distinguishing

Sections most often in play

Section 1961 Section 43B Section 115BBE Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263 Section 69A Section 69B

Issues it is cited on

section 158be section 43b(b)employees contribution to pf clarificatory amendment section 113 section 92f section 2(24)(x)retrospective amendment section 36(1)(va)section 43b section 158bb section 2(24)

Judgments citing CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn

M/S. Loka Shikshana Trust, Hubli vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 718/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Loka Shikshana Trust, The Assistant Post Box No. 30, Director Of Income Samyukta Karnataka, Tax, Koppikar Road, Cpc, Hubli – 580 020. Bangalore Vs. Pan: Aaatl1086H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Ashok Kumar, Ca : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 07-02-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07-02-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 25.10.2021 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2019-20 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. That, The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, In So Far As Is Prejudicial To The Interests Of The Appellant, Is Bad & Erroneous In Law & Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nfac Is Erred In Fact & In Law In Confirming The Action Of The Assessing Officer Of Adding The Amount Of Delayed

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Kumar, CA

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Loka Shikshana Trust, The Assistant Post Box No. 30, Director of Income Samyukta Karnataka, Tax, Koppikar Road, CPC, Hubli – 580 020. Bangalore Vs. PAN: AAATL1086H APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Ashok Kumar, CA : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue by CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 07-02-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 07-02-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by assessee against…

Sri, Ramachandra Naveen, Bangalore vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 710/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore07 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2019-20 Shri. Ramachandra Naveen, Vs. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax, No.4140 Sam Chambers, 80 Feet Road, Central Processing Centre, Girinagar, 4Th Phase, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 085. Pan : Acvpn 6688 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Vijay Kumar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Sankar Ganesh, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 07.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan: V. Vasudevan

For Appellant: Shri. Vijay Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 Shri. Ramachandra Naveen, Vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, No.4140 Sam Chambers, 80 Feet Road, Central Processing Centre, Girinagar, 4th Phase, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 085. PAN : ACVPN 6688 E APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Vijay Kumar, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Sankar Ganesh, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 07.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 07.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President : V. Vasude…

Sivan Securities Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 708/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Sivan Securities Pvt. The Deputy Ltd., Commissioner Of No. 23/2, Coffeeday Square, Income Tax, Vittal Mallya Road, Cpc, Bangalore – 560 001. Bangalore. Vs. Pan: Aaccs5138G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri C. Ramesh, Ca : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 07-02-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07-02-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 21.10.2021 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A)-11, Bangalore Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Is Opposed To The Facts Of The Case & Law Applicable To It. 2. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Erred In Confirming The Disallowance Of Rs.11,05,657/- Invoking The Provisions Of Section 143(1)(A)(Ii) Of The Act, Holding That The Said Amount Is Assessable Under The Provisions Of Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri C. Ramesh, CA

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s. Sivan Securities Pvt. The Deputy Ltd., Commissioner of No. 23/2, Coffeeday Square, Income Tax, Vittal Mallya Road, CPC, Bangalore – 560 001. Bangalore. Vs. PAN: AACCS5138G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri C. Ramesh, CA : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue by CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 07-02-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 07-02-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by assessee ag…

Vishal Enterprises, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 511/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore07 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri. Sandeep Chalapathy, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.510 and 511/Bang/2021 Assessment Years : 2018-19 and 2019-20 M/s. Vishal Enterprises, Vs. DCIT, No.539, CMH Road, Central Processing Centre, Indiranagar, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 034. PAN : AADFV 3616 Q APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Sandeep Chalapathy, CA Revenue by : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 07.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 07.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President : V. Vasudevan, Vice Pre…

Vishal Enterprises, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 510/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore07 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri. Sandeep Chalapathy, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Shree Shyam Designs Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 700/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Shree Shyam Designs Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax, No.50/1A/514/2/1, Shri Rajarajeshwari Central Processing Centre, Arcade, 2Nd Floor, Outer Ring Road, Bengaluru. Veerannapalya, Nagawara, Bengaluru – 560 045. Pan : Aakcs 8509 D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. C. A. Madhukeshwar Hegde, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 03.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.02.2022 O R D E R Per N V Vasudevan: V. Vasudevan

For Appellant: Shri. C. A. Madhukeshwar Hegde, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Shree Shyam Designs Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, No.50/1A/514/2/1, Shri Rajarajeshwari Central Processing Centre, Arcade, 2nd Floor, Outer Ring Road, Bengaluru. Veerannapalya, Nagawara, Bengaluru – 560 045. PAN : AAKCS 8509 D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. C. A. Madhukeshwar Hegde, CA Revenue by : Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 03.02.2022 Date of Pronouncem…

Marappa Shivakumar, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 696/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Chalapathy, CA

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2018-19 Shri Marappa Shivakumar, The Deputy No. 149, Old No. 1 of 53, Commissioner of 4th Cross, Lalbhag Road, Income Tax, K S Garden, CPC, Bangalore – 560 027. Bangalore. Vs. PAN: BGVPS5989L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Sandeep Chalapathy, CA : Shri Sankarganesh K, JCIT Revenue by (DR) Date of Hearing : 02-02-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 02-02-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by asse…

Haradanahally Chennappa Reddy Arunamma, Tumkur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 683/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Chalapathy, CA

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2018-19 Shri Haradanahally Chennappa Reddy The Deputy Arunamma, Commissioner of #F22, Narayana Enterprises, Income Tax, MG Road, Maruthi Plaza, CPC, Tumkur – 572 101. Vs. Bangalore. PAN: ACTPA2931P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Sandeep Chalapathy, CA : Shri Sankarganesh K, JCIT Revenue by (DR) Date of Hearing : 01-02-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 01-02-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed b…

Transsys Solutions Pvt Ltd, Kodambakkam vs. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 489/CHNY/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.489/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 M/S. Transsys Solutions Pvt. Ltd., The Assistant Director Of Plot. Super A 16-17, Rr Towers, Tvk Vs. Income Tax, Industrial Estate, Guindy, Cpc, Bengaluru 560 500. Chennai 600 032. [Pan:Aadct4603N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Pawan Bohra, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 25.01.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), New Delhi Dated 21.09.2021 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2019-20 On 25.10.2019. The Cpc, Bengaluru Has Completed The Assessment Under Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Bohra, C.AFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 44A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’ए’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी दुगा" राव "ाियक सद" एवं "ी जी. मंजुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member & Shri G. Manjunatha, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.489/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 M/s. TransSys Solutions Pvt. Ltd., The Assistant Director of Plot. Super A 16-17, RR Towers, TVK Vs. Income Tax, Industrial Estate, Guindy, CPC, Bengaluru 560 500. Chennai 600 032. [PAN:AADCT4603N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri Pawan Bohra, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/…

Sunny International Limited, Haryana Chandigarh vs. ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru, Karnataka Bengaluru

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee are allowed

ITA 1627/DEL/2021[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Sh. Rama Kanta Panda & Sh. Narender Kumar Choudhry

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. RAMA KANTA PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos. 1626 & 1627/Del/2021 [Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20] Sunny International Vs DCIT,Centralised Processing Limited Centre (CPC), Bengaluru. C/o Rajiv Goel& Associates, SCO 823-824, 1st Floor, Sector 22A, Chandigarh. PAN- AATCS8977L Appellant Respondent Appellant by Sh. Dhruv Goel, CA Respondent by Sh. Umesh Takyar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 25.01.2022 Date of pronouncement 31.01.2022 O R D E R PER N. K. CHOUDHRY, JM: The Assessee has prefer…

Sunny International Limited, Haryana Chandigarh vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru, Karnataka Bengaluru

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee are allowed

ITA 1626/DEL/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Sh. Rama Kanta Panda & Sh. Narender Kumar Choudhry

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Valsad Circle, Valsad vs. M/S. Mangaldeep, Valsad

In the result, appeals in ITA No

ITA 699/SRT/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jan 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.699/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) The Acit, Valsad Circle, Vs. M/S. Mangaldeep, 1St Floor, Shankeshwar Complex, Valsad. Dhobiwad, Valsad, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahfm7130L (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection No.11/Srt/2021 [Arising In Ita No.699/Srt/2018] ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) M/S. Mangaldeep, Vs. The Acit, Valsad Circle, 1St Floor, Shankeshwar Complex, Valsad. Dhobiwad, Valsad, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahfm7130L (Applicant-Co-Objector) (Respondent)

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRIPAWAN SINGH, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.699/SRT/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) The ACIT, Valsad Circle, Vs. M/s. Mangaldeep, 1st Floor, Shankeshwar Complex, Valsad. Dhobiwad, Valsad, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAHFM7130L (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection No.11/SRT/2021 [Arising in ITA No.699/SRT/2018] ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) M/s. Mangaldeep, Vs. The ACIT, Valsad Circle, 1st Floor, Shankeshwar Complex, Valsad. Dhobiwad, V…

Commercial Auto Sales Pvt. Ltd., Allahabad vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre, Bengaluru

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

ITA 15/ALLD/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad20 Jan 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.S K Jaiswal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.15/Alld./2021 Assessment Year: 2019-20 M/s. Commercial Auto Sales Assistant Director of Income Private Limited v. Tax(CPC), Centralized 4-C, Maharishi Dayanand Marg Processing Center , Allahabad, U.P. Bengaluru-560500 (Jurisdictional A0: Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-II, Allahabad, U.P.) PAN:AABCC3962F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Sh.S K Jaiswal, CA Respondent by: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 23.12. 2021 Date of pronouncement…

Day N Day Services Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT, CC-1(1), Chennai

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 425/CHNY/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 424 & 425/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri H. Surendar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanat Kumar Raha, Addl.CIT

Section 113Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,‘डी’ "याय पीठ,चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी महावीर "संह, उपा"य" एवं "ी जी. मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं./ITA Nos.: 424 & 425/CHNY/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/s. DAY N DAY Services Pvt. Vs The DCIT, Ltd., Corporate Circle-1(1), No.1, Second Main Road, Chennai. Ramakrishna Nagar, Chennai – 600 028. PAN: AABCD 0609G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओ रसे/Appellant by : Shri H. Surendar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by…

Day N Day Services Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT, CC - 1(1), Chennai

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 424/CHNY/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Jan 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 424 & 425/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri H. Surendar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanat Kumar Raha, Addl.CIT

Section 113Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Sarvesh Multi Plast India (P) Ltd, Erode vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 255/CHNY/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar(Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR

Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

…the dues were paid before due date of filing of return of income and therefore, the same would be deductible as per various judicial decisions. However, relying upon contrary decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (41 Taxmann.com 100), it was held by appellate authority that the same would not be allowable as per Sec.36(1)(va). The amendment to this section by Finance Act, 2021 was clarificatory in nature. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 3. We find that in the cited decision of Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. V/s ACIT (ITA Nos. 402-403…

Bi Worldwide India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 433/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. B.R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri C.R Krishna, CA

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s BI Worldwide India Pvt. The Dy. Ltd., Commissioner of 28, Opp DBS Bank, Income-tax, Ulsoor Road, Circle-(1)(1)(2), Bangalore – 560 042. Vs. Bangalore. PAN: AAECB 5878L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri C.R Krishna, CA : Smt. Priyadarshini Besaganni, Revenue by JCIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 28-12-2021 Date of Pronouncement : 04-01-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the o…

Sugandh, Moradabad vs. Itd, CPC, Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1259/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Dec 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2018-19] Sugandh, Vs Itd, Jawahar Market, G.M.D.Road, Cpc, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh-244001. Bengaluru. Pan-Aaefs7109J Appellant Respondent Appellant By None Respondent By Sh. Om Prakash, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 30.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 30.12.2021

Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “SMC” BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER [Assessment Year : 2018-19] Sugandh, vs ITD, Jawahar Market, G.M.D.Road, CPC, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh-244001. Bengaluru. PAN-AAEFS7109J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by None Respondent by Sh. Om Prakash, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 30.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement 30.12.2021 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2018-19 is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi dated 27.07.2021. No one appeared o…

M/S. Vijay Samraj Hotels Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 504/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Dec 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri. B.R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Vijay Samraj Hotels P. The Assistant Ltd., Commissioner Of No. 18, 3Rd Main Road, Income Tax, Gandhinagar, Cpc, Bangalore – 560 009. Bangalore. Vs. Pan: Aabcv4731B Appellant Respondent Shri S.V. Ravishankar, Assessee By : Advocate & Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, Ca : Shri Raghavendra Rao, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 01-12-2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 28-12-2021 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 30.07.2021 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2019-20 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Impugned Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Appeal Centre, Bengaluru Karnataka Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Opposed To Law, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Appellant'S Case.

For Appellant: Advocate & Ms. Sunaina

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Vijay Samraj Hotels P. The Assistant Ltd., Commissioner of No. 18, 3rd Main Road, Income Tax, Gandhinagar, CPC, Bangalore – 560 009. Bangalore. Vs. PAN: AABCV4731B APPELLANT RESPONDENT Shri S.V. Ravishankar, Assessee by : Advocate & Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, CA : Shri Raghavendra Rao, Addl. Revenue by CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 01-12-2021 Date of Pronouncement : 28-12-2021 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has…

Abhay Shrivastva, Faridabad vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengalurur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1289/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Dec 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2018-19] Abhay Shrivastva, Vs Dcit, 501, Sears Vth Floor, Sector-86, Cpc, Faridabad, Haryana-121007. Bengaluru. Pan-Bgjps08499B Appellant Respondent Appellant By Sh. Gurjit Singh, Ca Respondent By Sh. Om Prakash, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 28.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 28.12.2021

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “SMC” BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER [Assessment Year : 2018-19] Abhay Shrivastva, vs DCIT, 501, Sears Vth Floor, Sector-86, CPC, Faridabad, Haryana-121007. Bengaluru. PAN-BGJPS08499B APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Sh. Gurjit Singh, CA Respondent by Sh. Om Prakash, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 28.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement 28.12.2021 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2018-19 is directed against the order of Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi dated…