CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn

41 Taxmann.com 100High Court2014#118 most cited

What is CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn authority for?

Employees' contributions to provident fund or other welfare funds are deductible under section 36(1)(va) only if paid by the due date specified in the respective welfare fund enactments, and section 43B does not extend this period to the income tax return filing due date under section 139(1).

540

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn · Section 43B · Section 36(1)(va) · employees contribution to PF · welfare funds due date · allowable deduction · income tax return filing date · Section 2(24)(x) · provident fund payment · EssaeTeraoka distinguishing

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn

Sankalp Dyeing & Printing Mills Pvt. Ltd., Surat vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 2(1)(2), Surat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 45/SRT/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) 1 Karpara Project Engineering P. Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner 405, Sns Platina, Of Income Tax, Circle- Near Reliance Market, 1(1)(2), Surat. Behind J.H.Ambani School, Above Surat People’S Bank, Vesu, Surat – 395007. Pan: Aabck 8206 Aq Represented By Miss Chaitali Shah Ca Represented By Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr 2 Sankalp Dyeing & Printing Mills Pvt. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Ltd., Of Income Tax, Circle- Plot No.268, Road No.2, Gidc, Sachin, 2(1)(2), Surat. Surat. Pan: Aahcs 3980 P Represented By Represented By Sh Manish Malpani Ca Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr 3 The Udhna Udyognagar Sahakari Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Sangh Ltd., Of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Central Road No.10, Surat. P.O.Box No.1224, Udhyognagar, Udhna, Surat – 394 210. Pan: Aaaat 2932 K Represented By Represented By Sh. Rushi Parekh Ca Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr 4 Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Commissioner 75-1 & 75-2, Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1) G.I.D.C., Pandesara, (2), Surat. Surat – 394221. Pan: Aaccr 7050 C Represented By Represented By Miss Richa Toshniwal Ca Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr Tamanna Internationals Pvt. Ltd. & (04) Others.

Section 143(2)Section 254(1)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Hearing in Virtual Court) 1 Karpara Project Engineering P. Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner 405, SNS Platina, of Income Tax, Circle- Near Reliance Market, 1(1)(2), Surat. Behind J.H.Ambani School, Above Surat People’s Bank, Vesu, Surat – 395007. PAN: AABCK 8206 AQ Represented by Miss Chaitali Shah CA Represented by Miss Anupma Singla Sr DR 2 Sankalp Dyeing & Printing Mills Pvt. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Ltd., of Income Tax, Circle- Plot No.268, Road No.2, GIDC, Sachin, 2…

Karpara Project Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Surat vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1)(2), Surat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 309/SRT/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) 1 Karpara Project Engineering P. Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner 405, Sns Platina, Of Income Tax, Circle- Near Reliance Market, 1(1)(2), Surat. Behind J.H.Ambani School, Above Surat People’S Bank, Vesu, Surat – 395007. Pan: Aabck 8206 Aq Represented By Miss Chaitali Shah Ca Represented By Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr 2 Sankalp Dyeing & Printing Mills Pvt. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Ltd., Of Income Tax, Circle- Plot No.268, Road No.2, Gidc, Sachin, 2(1)(2), Surat. Surat. Pan: Aahcs 3980 P Represented By Represented By Sh Manish Malpani Ca Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr 3 The Udhna Udyognagar Sahakari Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Sangh Ltd., Of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Central Road No.10, Surat. P.O.Box No.1224, Udhyognagar, Udhna, Surat – 394 210. Pan: Aaaat 2932 K Represented By Represented By Sh. Rushi Parekh Ca Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr 4 Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Commissioner 75-1 & 75-2, Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1) G.I.D.C., Pandesara, (2), Surat. Surat – 394221. Pan: Aaccr 7050 C Represented By Represented By Miss Richa Toshniwal Ca Miss Anupma Singla Sr Dr Tamanna Internationals Pvt. Ltd. & (04) Others.

Section 143(2)Section 254(1)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Hearing in Virtual Court) 1 Karpara Project Engineering P. Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner 405, SNS Platina, of Income Tax, Circle- Near Reliance Market, 1(1)(2), Surat. Behind J.H.Ambani School, Above Surat People’s Bank, Vesu, Surat – 395007. PAN: AABCK 8206 AQ Represented by Miss Chaitali Shah CA Represented by Miss Anupma Singla Sr DR 2 Sankalp Dyeing & Printing Mills Pvt. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Ltd., of Income Tax, Circle- Plot No.268, Road No.2, GIDC, Sachin, 2…

M/S. Zion Hospitals and Research Centre Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7(1)(2), Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 448/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Zion Hospitals & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy No. 9, “Le Villa”, Commissioner Of Kirti Layout, Income Tax, Kammanahalli Main Road, Circle – 7 [1][2], Bangalore – 560 084. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aaacz4369G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 17-03-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 17-03-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.08.2021 U/S. 250 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2019-20 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Orders Of The Authorities Below In So Far As They Are Against The Appellant Are Opposed To Law. Equity, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax [Appeals] / National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac For Short] Is Not Justified In Upholding The Determination Of Total Loss Of Appellant In The Intimation U/S. 143[1] Of The Act, At Rs. 63,89,502/-As Against The Returned Loss Of Rs.

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate
Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 234BSection 250Section 36Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Zion Hospitals and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy No. 9, “Le Villa”, Commissioner of Kirti Layout, Income Tax, Kammanahalli Main Road, Circle – 7 [1][2], Bangalore – 560 084. Vs. Bangalore. PAN: AAACZ4369G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue by CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 17-03-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 17-03-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present a…

Technocon Builders, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(2)(1) Represented by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 59/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Technocon Builders, The Deputy # 337, Sf 8, Commissioner Of Karuna Complex, Income Tax, Sampige Road, Circle - 2 (2)(1), Malleshwaram, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 003. Pan: Aaift3196L Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Rajagopal, Ca : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 16-03-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 16-03-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 22.11.2021 U/S. 250 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2019-20 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 To The Extent Which Is Against The Appellant Is Opposed To Law, Without Jurisdiction, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.

For Appellant: Shri Rajagopal, CA
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 30Section 32Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Technocon Builders, The Deputy # 337, SF 8, Commissioner of Karuna Complex, Income Tax, Sampige Road, Circle - 2 (2)(1), Malleshwaram, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 003. PAN: AAIFT3196L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Rajagopal, CA : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue by CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 16-03-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 16-03-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed…

Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Limited, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 599/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year :2018-19 M/S. Karnataka State Electronics Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Development Corporation Ltd., Income Tax, 2Nd Floor, Ttmc “A” Block, Cpc, Bengaluru. Bmtc, Shanthinagar, K. H. Road, Bengaluru–560 027. Pan : Aabck 6661 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Raghavendra R Chakravarthy, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 09.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 11.03.2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Raghavendra R Chakravarthy, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 10Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year :2018-19 M/s. Karnataka State Electronics Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Development Corporation Ltd., Income Tax, 2nd Floor, TTMC “A” Block, CPC, Bengaluru. BMTC, Shanthinagar, K. H. Road, Bengaluru–560 027. PAN : AABCK 6661 P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Raghavendra R Chakravarthy, CA Revenue by : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 09.03.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 11.03.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan,…

Alert Detective Force, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 33/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Alert Detective Force, Vs. Dcit, B 376, 9Th Cross, Peenya 1St Stage, Central Processing Centre, Ring Road, Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru. Bangalore – 560 058. Pan : Abcfa 0594 J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Mahesh G, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 08.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.03.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan: . V. Vasudevan

For Appellant: Shri. Mahesh G, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s. Alert Detective Force, Vs. DCIT, B 376, 9th Cross, Peenya 1st Stage, Central Processing Centre, Ring Road, Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru. Bangalore – 560 058. PAN : ABCFA 0594 J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Mahesh G, CA Revenue by : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 08.03.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 08.03.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President : . V. Vasudevan, Vice President…