CIT v. Fortune Hotels and Estates (P.) Ltd.

52 Taxmann.com 330High Court2014#8490 most cited

What is CIT v. Fortune Hotels and Estates (P.) Ltd. authority for?

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied with reference to income determined by invoking the deeming provisions of section 50C, as this does not constitute concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.

13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Fortune Hotels and Estates · section 271(1)(c) · section 50C · penalty for concealment of income · penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars · deeming section · addition on account of section 50C · Bombay High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Fortune Hotels and Estates (P.) Ltd.

Nikhil Mukesh Patel, Mumbai vs. ACIT 21(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA 291/MUM/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2009-10 Niraj Mukesh Patel Flat No. Asst. Commissioner Of 6, 2Nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. Pan No. Aavpp9786F Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year: 2009-10 Nikhil Mukesh Patel Flat Asst. Commissioner Of No. 6, 2Nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. Pan No. Aavpp8745J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Dinkle Hariya, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Neil Philip, Dr Date Of Hearing : 10/09/2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 19/09/2018

For Appellant: Ms. Dinkle Hariya, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Neil Philip, DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 50CSection 54Section 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2009-10 Niraj Mukesh Patel Flat No. Asst. Commissioner of 6, 2nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. PAN No. AAVPP9786F Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year: 2009-10 Nikhil Mukesh Patel Flat Asst. Commissioner of No. 6, 2nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. PAN No. AAVPP87…

Niraj Mukesh Patel, Mumbai vs. ACIT 21(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA 290/MUM/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2009-10 Niraj Mukesh Patel Flat No. Asst. Commissioner Of 6, 2Nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. Pan No. Aavpp9786F Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year: 2009-10 Nikhil Mukesh Patel Flat Asst. Commissioner Of No. 6, 2Nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. Pan No. Aavpp8745J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Dinkle Hariya, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Neil Philip, Dr Date Of Hearing : 10/09/2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 19/09/2018

For Appellant: Ms. Dinkle Hariya, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Neil Philip, DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 50CSection 54Section 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2009-10 Niraj Mukesh Patel Flat No. Asst. Commissioner of 6, 2nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. PAN No. AAVPP9786F Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year: 2009-10 Nikhil Mukesh Patel Flat Asst. Commissioner of No. 6, 2nd Floor, Vibhuti Vs. Income Tax-21(1), Apartments, Ruia Park, Mumbai. Gandhi Gram Road, Juhu, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 400049. PAN No. AAVPP87…