CIT v. Farida Leather

238 Taxmann.com 473Reported decision#20025 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2022.

Judgments citing CIT v. Farida Leather

Springer Nature Customer Services Centre Gmbh, New Delhi vs. JCIT, Internationalo Taxation, Circle-3(1)(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2534/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2013-14] Springer Nature Customer Services Vs Jcit Centre Gmbh (Earlier Known As (International Taxation), Springer Customer Centre Gmbh), Circle-3(1)(2), 7Th Floor, Vijaya Building, New Delhi. 17-Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001. Pan-Aascs1092B Appellant Respondent Appellant By S/Shri Himanshu Sinha, Bhuwan Dhooper & Vibhu Gupta, Advocates Respondent By Ms. Rashmita Jha, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 20.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 14.10.2022

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 234BSection 271Section 9(1)(vi)

…xport fee. Once the assessee was not required to deduct the tax at source, it cannot be said that the assessee failed to deduct tax at source so as to apply Section 40(a)(ia)." 21. Similarly, the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Farida Leather Company 238 Taxmann.com 473 has held as under: “11. In the instant case, it is seen, admittedly that the non-resident agents were only procuring orders abroad and following up payments with buyers. No other services are rendered other than the above. Sourcing orders abroad, for which payments have been made directly to the non-residents abroad, does not involve any…

Springer Verlag Gmbh, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle- 3(1)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are disposed of as

ITA 434/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri N.K. Choudhry

For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 9(1)(vi)

…ort fee. Once the assessee was not required to deduct the tax at source, it cannot be said that the assessee failed to deduct tax at source so as to apply Section 40(a)(ia)." 21. Similarly, the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Farida Leather Company 238 Taxmann.com 473 has held as under: “11. In the instant case, it is seen, admittedly that the non-resident agents were only procuring orders abroad and following up payments with buyers. No other services are rendered other than the above. Sourcing orders abroad, for which payments have been made directly to the non-residents abroad, does not involve any…

Springer Verlag Gmbh, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle- 3(1)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are disposed of as

ITA 3826/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri N.K. Choudhry

For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 9(1)(vi)

…ort fee. Once the assessee was not required to deduct the tax at source, it cannot be said that the assessee failed to deduct tax at source so as to apply Section 40(a)(ia)." 21. Similarly, the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Farida Leather Company 238 Taxmann.com 473 has held as under: “11. In the instant case, it is seen, admittedly that the non-resident agents were only procuring orders abroad and following up payments with buyers. No other services are rendered other than the above. Sourcing orders abroad, for which payments have been made directly to the non-residents abroad, does not involve any…

DCIT 8(2)(1), Mumbai vs. Shamrock Pharmachemi P. Ltd., Mumbai

In the result, both appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 862/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M.Balaganeshita Nos. 862 & 863/Mum/2018 (Assessment Years :2013-14 & 2014-15) Dcit-8(2)(1) Vs. M/S. Shamrock Pharmachemi Room No.624, Pvt.Ltd. Aaykar Bhawan, M.K.Road Off Dr. E Moses Road Mumbai-400 020 Worli, Mumbai-400 025 Pan/Gir No.Aaacs6290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Bharat Gandhi, Ar Revenue By Shri V.Vinod Kumar, Sr.Ar Date Of Hearing 28/10/2020 Date Of Pronouncement 11/11/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per M. Balaganesh (A.M): These Two Appeals Filed By Revenue In Ita Nos. 862 & 863/Mum/2018 For Assessment Years (Ay) 2013-14 & 2014-15 Arise Out Of The Order By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 14, Mumbai In Appeals No.Cit(A)-14/It-170/15-16 & Cit(A)-14/It- 119/16-17, Dated 27/11/2017 (Ld. Cit(A) In Short) Against The Order Of Assessment Passed U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As Act) Dated 31/08/2016 By The Ld. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-8(2)(1), Mumbai (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. Ao).

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT), ”G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 862 & 863/Mum/2018 (Assessment Years :2013-14 & 2014-15) DCIT-8(2)(1) Vs. M/s. Shamrock Pharmachemi Room No.624, Pvt.Ltd. Aaykar Bhawan, M.K.Road Off Dr. E Moses Road Mumbai-400 020 Worli, Mumbai-400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAACS6290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Bharat Gandhi, AR Revenue by Shri V.Vinod Kumar, Sr.AR Date of Hearing 28/10/2020 Date of Pronouncement 11/11/2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): These two appeals filed b…

CIT v. Farida Leather (238 Taxmann.com 473) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax