CIT v. Dilbagh Rai Arora

263 Taxmann 30High Court2019#2423 most cited

What is CIT v. Dilbagh Rai Arora authority for?

An addition treating share capital as unaccounted money cannot be sustained if it relies solely on a third-party statement, like that of a dummy director recorded during a survey, without confronting the assessee with the said statement.

48

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Dilbagh Rai Arora · Dilbagh Rai Arora · Section 68 · Section 69A · share capital · unaccounted money · dummy director statement · survey statement · lack of confrontation · natural justice · addition of income · survey action

Also reported as

104 Taxmann.com 371177 DTR 220

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Dilbagh Rai Arora