CIT v. CPL Tannery
318 ITR 179High Court2009#1762 most cited
What is CIT v. CPL Tannery authority for?
Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is not justified for cash payments if they are genuine, made out of business expediency, and the assessee's bona fides are not disputed, even after the 2009 amendments to the section.
64
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.
Also referred to as
CIT v. CPL Tannery · Section 40A(3) · cash payment disallowance · business expediency · genuine transactions · bona fide payments · 318 ITR 179 · Calcutta High Court · amended provisions · exigency of business