CIT v. CIT vs. Samay Tiles Ltd.

50 Taxmann.com 332High Court2014#21012 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 358,351 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2022.

Judgments citing CIT v. CIT vs. Samay Tiles Ltd.

Lubrizol Advanced Materials Private Limited, Mumbai vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Vadodara

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1349/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Smt Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1349/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10) Lubrizol Advanced Materials Acit, बनाम/ Private Limited, Circle – 1(2), Vs. 6Th & 7Th Floor, Jaswanti Baroda. Landmark, Mehra Industrial Estate, Lbs Marg, Vikhroli (W), Mumbai-400 079. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaci 4361 B .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri Dhanesh Bafna, A.R. अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Lalit P. Jain, Sr. D.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By:

For Appellant: Shri Lalit P. Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘MhMhMhMh* अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD U;kf;d lnL; ds le{kA LkoZJh oZJh oZJh olhe vgen oZJh olhe vgen olhe vgen] ys[kk lnL; ,oa olhe vgen ] ys[kk lnL; ,oa ] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Ek/kqferk jkW; ] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Ek/kqferk jkW; Ek/kqferk jkW;] ] ] ] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{kA Ek/kqferk jkW; U;kf;d lnL; ds le{kA U;kf;d lnL; ds le{kA BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And SMT MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1349/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10) Lubrizol Advanced Materials ACIT, बनाम/ Private Limited, Ci…

CIT v. CIT vs. Samay Tiles Ltd. (50 Taxmann.com 332) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax