CIT v. Chandne W.Pvt.L

212 ITR 63High Court1995#19876 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 346,713 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2022.

Judgments citing CIT v. Chandne W.Pvt.L

Grameen Impact Investment India Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs. National -E Assessment Centre, Delhi

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2375/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2018-19 Grameen Impact Investments India National-E-Assessment Pvt. Ltd., Centre, 306, 3Rd Floor, A Wing, Devroop Vs. New Delhi-110 001. Building, 36, Turner Road, Bandra West, Mumbai-400050. Pan No. Aaacr 9005 R Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. K. Shivaram & Mr. Shashi Bekal, Ars : Revenue By Mr. Satyapal Kumar, Dr Date Of Hearing : 19/12/2022 Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Year: 2016-17 Grameen Impact Investments India Dy. Cit-13(3)(1), Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 229, Aayakar 306, 3Rd Floor, A Wing, Devroop Vs. Bhavan, M.K. Road, Building, 36, Turner Road, Bandra Mumbai-400050. West, Mumbai-400050. Pan No. Aaacr 9005 R Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. K. Shivaram & Mr. Shashi
Section 56

…ned by the assessee, the following observation is mentioned by the assessee, the following observation is stated as under: stated as under:- 7A. regarding case 7A. regarding case law CIT v. Chandrie & Co. P. Ltd [1995] law CIT v. Chandrie & Co. P. Ltd [1995] 212 ITR 63 (Mad.) 212 ITR 63 (Mad.) (HC): The above-mentioned case law is not applicable in this mentioned case law is not applicable in this mentioned case law is not applicable in this case as it is not related to the issue as per Para 1 and case as it is not related to the issue as per Para 1 and case as it is not related to the issue as per Para 1 and P…

CIT v. Chandne W.Pvt.L (212 ITR 63) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax