CIT v. Brandix Mauritius

158 Taxmann.com 247Supreme Court of India2024#6190 most cited

What is CIT v. Brandix Mauritius authority for?

An assessment order passed without a DIN, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, cannot be sustained. However, if the DIN was generated and communicated separately, the assessment order may be valid despite the absence of DIN in its body, especially if the issue is stayed by the Supreme Court.

19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Brandix Mauritius · DIN · assessment order · valid assessment · absence of DIN · interim stay · Supreme Court · faceless assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Brandix Mauritius

Ramasamy Kandasamy, Karur vs. ITO, Ward-1, Karur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2023/CHNY/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2023/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 V. Ramasamy Kandasamy, The Ito, No.4/76, Sf No.927, Sukkaliyur, Ward-1, Karur-639 003. Karur. [Pan: Ajgpk 4945 H]

For Appellant: Mr.H. Yeshwanth KumarFor Respondent: Ms.R. Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 151

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं एवं एवं एवं "ी जगदीश, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2023/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 v. Ramasamy Kandasamy, The ITO, No.4/76, SF No.927, Sukkaliyur, Ward-1, Karur-639 003. Karur. [PAN: AJGPK 4945 H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr.H. Yeshwanth Kumar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Ms.R. Anitha, Addl.CIT सुनवाईक"तारीख/Date of…

Ms. Shree Waheguru Fashions Pvt. Ltd., Ring Road, Surat vs. PCIT, Aayakar Bhavan, Surat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 402/SRT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Apr 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.402/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2020-21) (Hybrid Hearing) M/S Shree Waheguru Fashions Principal Commissioner Of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd., B-1110, Radha Krishna Vs. Income-Tax (Central), Textile Market, Ring Road, Surat Central Circle-1, Surat, Aayakar - 395002 Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aahcs 9568 H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 263

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.402/SRT/2024 Assessment Year: (2020-21) (Hybrid Hearing) M/s Shree Waheguru Fashions Principal Commissioner of बनाम/ Pvt. Ltd., B-1110, Radha Krishna Vs. Income-tax (Central), Textile Market, Ring Road, Surat Central Circle-1, Surat, Aayakar - 395002 Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AAHCS 9568 H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Appellant by Shri Rasesh Shah, CA राज" की ओर से /Respondent…

Peoples Forum, Bhubaneswar, Odisha vs. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), CIT(Exemption)Hyderabad

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed and the stay petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 358/CTK/2023[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Apr 2024

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwals.P. No.12/Ctk/2023 People People Forums Forums, Hig-97, Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Cit (Exemptions), Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Hyderabad Hyderabad Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aaatpo 2214 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K.Agrawala, Ca/S.K.Hota, Adv /S.K.Hota, Adv Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawala, CA/S.K.Hota, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, ld
Section 12ASection 80G

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MANISH AGARWAL MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER S.P. No.12/CTK/2023 People People Forums Forums, HIG-97, Vs. CIT (Exemptions), CIT (Exemptions), Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Hyderabad Hyderabad Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar PAN/GIR No PAN/GIR No.AAATPO 2214 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S.K.Agrawala, CA/S.K.Hota, Adv /S.K.Hota, Adv Revenu…

Dhanterash Sales Private Limited., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), Kolkata.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1184/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.1184/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dhanterash Sales Pvt. Ltd………….........................…………………….……Appellant 229, Ajc Bose Road, Kolkata – 700020. [Pan: Aadcd2722L] Vs. Ito, Ward-12(1), Kolkata………..…..…….…..….........…........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit- Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 21, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 26, 2024 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 01.11.2023 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.1184/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dhanterash Sales Pvt. Ltd………….........................…………………….……Appellant 229, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata – 700020. [PAN: AADCD2722L] vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), Kolkata………..…..…….…..….........…........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT- DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : February 21, 2024 Date of pronouncing t…

CIT v. Brandix Mauritius (158 Taxmann.com 247) — Cited in 19 Judgments | BharatTax