CIT v. Bholanath Polyfeb (P.) Ltd.

40 Taxmann.com 494High Court2013#2872 most cited

What is CIT v. Bholanath Polyfeb (P.) Ltd. authority for?

When bogus purchases are detected but the corresponding sales are not doubted, the addition to income should be restricted to the profit element embedded in such purchases, rather than the entire purchase amount, by estimating a fair rate of profit.

41

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Bholanath Polyfeb (P.) Ltd. · Section 147 · Section 133(6) · Section 69C · bogus purchases · unverifiable purchases · profit element · addition restricted · estimated profit · fair rate of profit · corresponding sales not doubted · Section 44AD

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Bholanath Polyfeb (P.) Ltd.

ACIT, Central Circle1(3), Mumbai vs. M/S. Peninsula Land Limited, Mumbai

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 5632/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri S Rifaur Rahaman, Accountat Member Ita No. 5632 & 5633/Mum/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Acit, Cc – 1(3) Vs. M/S Peninsula Land 905, 9Th Floor, Pratistha Ltd., Bhavan, Old Cgo Bldg, No. 2, Peninsula (Annexe), M.K .Road, Spenta, Mathuradas Mumbai – 400020. Mill Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Parel, Mumbai- 400013. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaact5173A Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri. Aditya Rai. Dr Respondent By : Shri. Vijay Mehta.Ar Date Of Hearing 24.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 28.07.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: These Are The Two Appeals Filed The By The Revenue Against The Common Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-47, Mumbai Passed U/S 153A R.W.S 143(3) & 250 Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri. Aditya Rai. DRFor Respondent: Shri. Vijay Mehta.AR
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S RIFAUR RAHAMAN, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER ITA No. 5632 & 5633/Mum/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10 & 2010-11) ACIT, CC – 1(3) Vs. M/s Peninsula Land 905, 9th Floor, Pratistha Ltd., Bhavan, Old CGO Bldg, No. 2, Peninsula (Annexe), M.K .Road, Spenta, Mathuradas Mumbai – 400020. Mill Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Parel, Mumbai- 400013. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAACT5173A Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri. Aditya Rai. DR Respondent by : Shri. Vijay Mehta.AR Date of Hearing 24.06.2022 Date of Pronounce…

ITO 17 (2)(5), Mumbai vs. Parindra Harshad Bhuta, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby ordered to be dismissed

ITA 7480/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.7480/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Ito 17(2)(5) बिधम/ Parindra Harshad Bhuta Room No.123A, 1St Floor, 37, Ismail Building, Nagdevi Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, Street, Masjid Bunder, Churchgate, Mumbai- Mumbai-400003. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaqpb4539D (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Akhtar Ali Ansari (Dr) Assessee By: None सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 07/01/2020 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 15/01/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 05.10.2018 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -58, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2010- 11. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: -

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Akhtar Ali Ansari (DR)
Section 143(2)Section 147

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.7480/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) ITO 17(2)(5) बिधम/ Parindra Harshad Bhuta Room No.123A, 1st Floor, 37, Ismail Building, Nagdevi Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, Street, Masjid Bunder, Churchgate, Mumbai- Mumbai-400003. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAQPB4539D (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue by: Shri Akhtar Ali Ansari (DR) Assessee by: None सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 07/01/2020 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement…

ITO 25(2)(1), Mumbai vs. Actube Enterprises, Mumbai

ITA 3941/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3941/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) बिाम/ Income Tax Officer-25(2)(1) Actube Enterprises Room No. 505, C-10, 5Th 27, Laxmi Flat Owner Floor, Pratyakshkar Chs Limited , V. Bhavan, Bkc, M.G. Road Extension, Bandra(East), Vile Parle(East), Mumbai-400051 Mumbai-400057 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan: Aabfa2570J (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri. Vivek Anand Ojha (Dr) Assessee By: Apurva R. Shah (Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 01.07.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 05.08.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: This Appeal, Filed By Revenue, Being Ita No. 3941/Mum/2017, Is Directed Against Appellate Order Dated 15.03.2017 In Appeal No. Cit(A)-37/It-722/Ito-25(2)(1)/15-16, Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-37, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(A)”), For Assessment Year(Ay) 2010-11, The Appellate Proceedings Had Arisen Before Learned Cit(A) From Assessment Order Dated 31.12.2015 Passed By Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Called “The Ao”) U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act”) For Ay:2010-11. I.T.A. No.3941/Mum/2017

For Appellant: Apurva R. Shah (AR)For Respondent: Shri. Vivek Anand Ojha (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “A” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3941/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) बिाम/ Income Tax Officer-25(2)(1) Actube Enterprises Room No. 505, C-10, 5th 27, Laxmi Flat Owner Floor, Pratyakshkar CHS Limited , v. Bhavan, BKC, M.G. Road Extension, Bandra(East), Vile Parle(East), Mumbai-400051 Mumbai-400057 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ PAN: AABFA2570J (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue by: Shri. Vivek Anand Ojha (DR) Assesse…

Muffazal Hakim Penwala, Mumbai vs. ITO 17(2)(4), Mumbai

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 3740/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Nov 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3740/Mum/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Shri Muffazal Hakim Penawala Cit(A)-28, India House, Ground Floor, Earnest House, Ncpa Marg, बनाम/ Shop No. 1-2, 246, A. R. Street, Nairman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Vs. Mumbai-400 003 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aabpp 1934 H (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. Ruchi M. Rathod ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri M. V. Rajguru

For Appellant: Ms. Ruchi M. RathodFor Respondent: Shri M. V. Rajguru
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “एल” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “L” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM AND SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3740/Mum/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Shri Muffazal Hakim Penawala CIT(A)-28, India House, Ground Floor, Earnest House, NCPA Marg, बनाम/ Shop No. 1-2, 246, A. R. Street, Nairman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Vs. Mumbai-400 003 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. AABPP 1934 H (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant by : Ms. Ruchi M. Rathod ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : Shri M. V. Rajguru सुनवा…