CIT v. Bharat Hotels Ltd.

410 ITR 417High Court2019#146 most cited

What is CIT v. Bharat Hotels Ltd. authority for?

Employee contributions to provident fund and ESI, if paid beyond the due date prescribed by the respective welfare fund statutes, are not allowed as a deduction under the Income Tax Act.

486

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,164 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Bharat Hotels Ltd. · section 36(1)(va) · section 43B · employee contribution deduction · provident fund ESI late payment · due date of fund · disallowance of employee contributions · section 2(24)(x)

Also reported as

103 Taxmann.com 295

Sections most often in play

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)(a)(ii)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 43b(b)section 36(1)(va)section 2(24)(x)section 43bsection 2(24)section 36(1)section 43section 36section 28section 139(1)section 139section 143(1)

Judgments citing CIT v. Bharat Hotels Ltd.

Metalman Auto Private Limited, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle -1, Ludhiana

ITA 32/CHANDI/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

Sandeep Gupta, Chandigarh vs. DCIT, Circle 3(1), Chandigarh

ITA 31/CHANDI/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

Vidyadhar Tiwari, Baddi vs. ITO, Baddi

ITA 16/CHANDI/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

Sh. Vijay Kumar Singh, Baddi vs. ITO, Baddi

ITA 15/CHANDI/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

Sh. Vijay Kumar Singh, Baddi vs. ITO, Baddi

ITA 14/CHANDI/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

Parminder Singh, Ludhiana vs. ITO, Ludhiana

ITA 12/CHANDI/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

ITO, Ward 6(1), Ludhiana vs. Sh. Sita Ram Singla, Ludhiana

ITA 418/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

Ride Link Auto, Ludhiana vs. ITO Ward 7 (1), Ludhiana

ITA 394/CHANDI/2021[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 18/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/O Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Anjpb7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhore Garg, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B”, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 18/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 DCIT, Central Circle, Smt. Madhubala बनाम Patiala W/o Sh. Krishan Gopal, Ward No.1, Lehargaga, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ANJPB7890D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Vibhore Garg, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 09/CHD/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :…

M.W.S. & Co., Bhadohi vs. Dy. C.I.T., Range - 1, Varanasi

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 25/VNS/2021[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20 M.W.S. & Co., Naya Bazar V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Road, Bhadohi-221401, Uttar Central Processing Centre (Cpc), Pradesh, India Bengaluru [Jurisdictional Assessing Pan-Aaffm2003E Officer Being Dy./Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Varanasi, U.P. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

…eturn of income is filed , as per the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Vinay Cement Ltd.'s case(supra). However, Hon'ble Delhi High Court has now decided this issue in favour of Revenue in the case of CIT v. Bharat Hotels Limited reported in (2019) 410 ITR 417(Del.) , while impliedly reversing the stand taken in its earlier decision in the case of Aimil Limited (supra). However, the decision in the case of Aimil Limited (supra) was not brought to the notice of Hon'ble Judges of Delhi High Court while adjudicating in the case of Bharat Hotels (supra). The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court has decide…

M.W.S. & Co., Bhadohi vs. Dy. C.I.T., Range - 1, Varanasi

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 24/VNS/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 Apr 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20 M.W.S. & Co., Naya Bazar V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Road, Bhadohi-221401, Uttar Central Processing Centre (Cpc), Pradesh, India Bengaluru [Jurisdictional Assessing Pan-Aaffm2003E Officer Being Dy./Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Varanasi, U.P. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

…eturn of income is filed , as per the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Vinay Cement Ltd.'s case(supra). However, Hon'ble Delhi High Court has now decided this issue in favour of Revenue in the case of CIT v. Bharat Hotels Limited reported in (2019) 410 ITR 417(Del.) , while impliedly reversing the stand taken in its earlier decision in the case of Aimil Limited (supra). However, the decision in the case of Aimil Limited (supra) was not brought to the notice of Hon'ble Judges of Delhi High Court while adjudicating in the case of Bharat Hotels (supra). The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court has decide…

Late Kari Thimmegowda Rajashekhara, L/R by Ms. Megha B.R., Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(2)(1), Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 669/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…istinction has been accepted viz., CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn. [2014] 41 taxmann.com 100/ 366 ITR 170/223 Taxman 398 (Guj.), Popular Vehicles & Services Pvt Ltd v. CIT [2018] 96 taxmann.com 13/257 Taxman 120/406 ITR (Ker), CIT Vs. Bharat Hotels 410 ITR 417 (Delhi). 6. The CIT(A), thereafter held that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) by insertion of explanation 2 and the amendment to section 43B by insertion to explanation 5 by the Finance Bill 2021 was only declaratory / clarificatory in nature and there therefore was applicable with retrospective effect by necessary intendment of deeming nature…

Sri Mathikere Ramaiah Kodandaram, Bengaluru vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax CPC, Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 149/BANG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. Hemanth Pai, AR on behalf of Shri. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Priyadarshini Mishra, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…istinction has been accepted viz., CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn. [2014] 41 taxmann.com 100/ 366 ITR 170/223 Taxman 398 (Guj.), Popular Vehicles & Services Pvt Ltd v. CIT [2018] 96 taxmann.com 13/257 Taxman 120/406 ITR (Ker), CIT Vs. Bharat Hotels 410 ITR 417 (Delhi). 6. The CIT(A), thereafter held that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) by insertion of explanation 2 and the amendment to section 43B by insertion to explanation 5 by the Finance Bill 2021 was only declaratory / clarificatory in nature and there therefore was applicable with retrospective effect by necessary intendment of deeming nature…

Sri Mathikere Ramaiah Kodandaram, Bengaluru vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax CPC, Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 148/BANG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. Hemanth Pai, AR on behalf of Shri. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Priyadarshini Mishra, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…istinction has been accepted viz., CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn. [2014] 41 taxmann.com 100/ 366 ITR 170/223 Taxman 398 (Guj.), Popular Vehicles & Services Pvt Ltd v. CIT [2018] 96 taxmann.com 13/257 Taxman 120/406 ITR (Ker), CIT Vs. Bharat Hotels 410 ITR 417 (Delhi). 6. The CIT(A), thereafter held that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) by insertion of explanation 2 and the amendment to section 43B by insertion to explanation 5 by the Finance Bill 2021 was only declaratory / clarificatory in nature and there therefore was applicable with retrospective effect by necessary intendment of deeming nature…

Jangloos Chandak Creation Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, Cir. 11(1), Kolkata

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 495/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawal, Am]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ –“B” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH: KOLKATA [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Shri Girish Agrawal, AM] I.T.A. Nos. 494 & 495/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2017 -18 & 2018-19 Jangloos Chandak Creation Pvt. Vs. DCIT, Circle-11(1), Kolkata Ltd. (PAN: AABCJ 8458 M) Appellant Respondent Date of Hearing 06.04.2021 Date of Pronouncement 06.04.2021 For the Appellant None For the Respondent Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT ORDER Per Bench: Both the appeals preferred by the Assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi dated 28.09.2021 & 08.10.2021 fo…

Jangloos Chandak Creation Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, Cir. 11(1), Kolkata

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 494/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawal, Am]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ –“B” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH: KOLKATA [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Shri Girish Agrawal, AM] I.T.A. Nos. 494 & 495/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2017 -18 & 2018-19 Jangloos Chandak Creation Pvt. Vs. DCIT, Circle-11(1), Kolkata Ltd. (PAN: AABCJ 8458 M) Appellant Respondent Date of Hearing 06.04.2021 Date of Pronouncement 06.04.2021 For the Appellant None For the Respondent Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT ORDER Per Bench: Both the appeals preferred by the Assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi dated 28.09.2021 & 08.10.2021 fo…

Jai Singh Jadesa, Indore vs. DCIT CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 214/IND/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore04 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri G.B. Agrawal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 234ASection 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…of the Income Tax Act, 1961 would not be eligible for deduction u/s. 43B of the Act even after deposited before the due date of filing of tax return. The Ld. DR also relied upon the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Bharat Hotels Limited 410 ITR 417 which held against the assessee. The Ld. DR also relied upon the recent decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT vs. M/s Suzlon Energy Ltd. R/Tax Appeal No. 860 of 2019 order dated 11.02.2020. 7. The Ld. A.R. relied upon the decision of the Indore Bench in the case of Nataraj Dal Mill, Indore vs. ACIT ITA No. 153/IND/2021 ord…

Siddhi Enterprises, Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-44(1), New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 913/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad, S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing) आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A Nos. 912 & 913/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2019-20 M/S. Siddhi Enterprises, Income Tax Officer, C–5, Lawrence Road बनाम Ward : 44 (1), Industrial Area, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 035. Pan No. Aawfs2986H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Respondent: Shri Farhat Khan, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…I.T.A.Nos. 912 & 913/Del/2021 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCH “S.M.C.”NEW DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER, S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing) आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A Nos. 912 & 913/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2019-20 M/s. Siddhi Enterprises, Income Tax Officer, C–5, Lawrence Road बनाम Ward : 44 (1), Industrial Area, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 035. PAN No. AAWFS2986H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Sandeep Kumar, C. A.; िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee by : राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue by : Shri Farhat Khan, Sr. D.R.; 09/02/2022 सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date of hearin…

Siddhi Enterprises, Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-44(1), New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 912/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad, S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing) आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A Nos. 912 & 913/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2019-20 M/S. Siddhi Enterprises, Income Tax Officer, C–5, Lawrence Road बनाम Ward : 44 (1), Industrial Area, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 035. Pan No. Aawfs2986H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Respondent: Shri Farhat Khan, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…I.T.A.Nos. 912 & 913/Del/2021 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCH “S.M.C.”NEW DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER, S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing) आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A Nos. 912 & 913/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2019-20 M/s. Siddhi Enterprises, Income Tax Officer, C–5, Lawrence Road बनाम Ward : 44 (1), Industrial Area, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 035. PAN No. AAWFS2986H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Sandeep Kumar, C. A.; िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee by : राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue by : Shri Farhat Khan, Sr. D.R.; 09/02/2022 सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date of hearin…

Mithila and Mithila Enterprise, New Delhi vs. Ward- 49(4), New Delhi

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1906/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad, A N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia(Through Video Conferencing) आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A Nos. 1904, 1905 & 1906/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 Mithila & Mithila Enterprises, Assessing Officer, C-22, New Krishna Park, बनाम Ward : 49 (4), Vikas Puri, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 018. Pan No. Aasfm1647F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Pundir, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: 24/02/2022
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)Section 43B

…tion 5 to Section 43B and Explanation 2 to 2 I.T.A.Nos. 1904 TO 1906/Del/2021 Section 36(1)(viia) are retrospective in nature. The ld. CIT (Appeals) placed reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Bharat Hotels Ltd. (2019) 410 ITR 417; Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Merchem Ltd. 378 ITR 443 (Ker.); Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Unifac Management Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT 409 ITR 225; Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of B. S. Patel Vs. DCIT 326 ITR 457. 4. Before us the ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that while processing the retu…

Mithila and Mithila Enterprise, New Delhi vs. Ward- 49(4), New Delhi

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1905/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad, A N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia(Through Video Conferencing) आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A Nos. 1904, 1905 & 1906/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 Mithila & Mithila Enterprises, Assessing Officer, C-22, New Krishna Park, बनाम Ward : 49 (4), Vikas Puri, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 018. Pan No. Aasfm1647F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Pundir, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: 24/02/2022
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)Section 43B

…tion 5 to Section 43B and Explanation 2 to 2 I.T.A.Nos. 1904 TO 1906/Del/2021 Section 36(1)(viia) are retrospective in nature. The ld. CIT (Appeals) placed reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Bharat Hotels Ltd. (2019) 410 ITR 417; Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Merchem Ltd. 378 ITR 443 (Ker.); Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Unifac Management Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT 409 ITR 225; Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of B. S. Patel Vs. DCIT 326 ITR 457. 4. Before us the ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that while processing the retu…