CIT v. Bank of Tokyo Ltd.

71 Taxmann 85High Court1993#3937 most cited

What is CIT v. Bank of Tokyo Ltd. authority for?

The refund of guarantee commission for the unexpired period of a guarantee contract, where the contract is revoked prematurely, is a valid deduction for the assessee-bank.

30

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Bank of Tokyo Ltd. · 71 Taxmann 85 · refund of guarantee commission · premature revocation of guarantee · unexpired period · deduction for banks · income tax act

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Bank of Tokyo Ltd.

The ADIT (I.T)3(1) vs. M/S. Honkong & Shanghani Banking Corpn. Ltd

In the result, ITA Nos.2519 and 2520/Mum/2004 by revenue stand dismissed, ITA No

ITA 2519/MUM/2004[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Nov 2015AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am & Pawan Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2519 & 2520/Mum/2004 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:1999-2000 & 2000-01) M/S Hongkong & Shanghani Asstt.Direrctor Of Income Tax बनाम/ Banking Corporation Ltd., (International Taxation)-3(1), Vs. 52/60, M G Road, 136, Scindia House, Mumbai-400001 N M Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400038 .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ “एल” मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “L” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, AM AND PAWAN SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2519 and 2520/Mum/2004 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:1999-2000 and 2000-01) M/s Hongkong and Shanghani Asstt.Direrctor of Income Tax बनाम/ Banking Corporation Ltd., (International Taxation)-3(1), Vs. 52/60, M G Road, 136, Scindia House, Mumbai-400001 N M Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400038 .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2679 and 2680/Mum/2004 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:1999-2000 and 2000-01) M/s H…